The effects of rTMS on self-reported quality of life in younger and older adults with major depressive disorder.

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Katharina Göke, Jonathan Downar, Fidel Vila-Rodriguez, Zafiris J Daskalakis, Tarek K Rajji, Benoit H Mulsant, Daniel M Blumberger
{"title":"The effects of rTMS on self-reported quality of life in younger and older adults with major depressive disorder.","authors":"Katharina Göke, Jonathan Downar, Fidel Vila-Rodriguez, Zafiris J Daskalakis, Tarek K Rajji, Benoit H Mulsant, Daniel M Blumberger","doi":"10.1017/S0033291725102079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a well-established intervention for treatment-resistant depression. However, its effects on patient-reported outcomes, such as quality of life (QoL), have not been fully characterized, especially among older adults. This study compares the impact of rTMS on QoL in younger (<60 years) versus older (≥60 years) adults with major depressive disorder.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from 531 participants with depression (ages 18-89 years) from two randomized clinical trials (THREE-D and FOUR-D). All participants received either unilateral or bilateral rTMS or theta burst stimulation. QoL was assessed using the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire - Short Form at baseline, end of treatment, and 12-week follow-up, and compared between younger adults (age < 60 years; <i>n</i> = 360) and older adults (age ≥ 60 years, <i>n</i> = 171). The clinical relevance of the changes was evaluated through effect sizes, using a predefined threshold of 12 points as the minimal clinically important difference, and comparisons with community norms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After rTMS treatment, both younger and older adults experienced statistically significant improvements in QoL, with medium to large effect sizes. The effect was sustained over 12 weeks of follow-up. At baseline, only 0.3% of younger adults and 2.3% of older adults reported normal QoL, which significantly increased to, respectively, 19.8 and 19.4% by the end of treatment, and 23.7 and 26.8% at the 12-week follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>rTMS yielded acute and sustained clinically meaningful improvements in QoL, with similar effects among younger and older adults with depression. The magnitude of improvement was comparable to, or exceeded, that reported in antidepressant trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":"55 ","pages":"e303"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291725102079","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a well-established intervention for treatment-resistant depression. However, its effects on patient-reported outcomes, such as quality of life (QoL), have not been fully characterized, especially among older adults. This study compares the impact of rTMS on QoL in younger (<60 years) versus older (≥60 years) adults with major depressive disorder.

Methods: We analyzed data from 531 participants with depression (ages 18-89 years) from two randomized clinical trials (THREE-D and FOUR-D). All participants received either unilateral or bilateral rTMS or theta burst stimulation. QoL was assessed using the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire - Short Form at baseline, end of treatment, and 12-week follow-up, and compared between younger adults (age < 60 years; n = 360) and older adults (age ≥ 60 years, n = 171). The clinical relevance of the changes was evaluated through effect sizes, using a predefined threshold of 12 points as the minimal clinically important difference, and comparisons with community norms.

Results: After rTMS treatment, both younger and older adults experienced statistically significant improvements in QoL, with medium to large effect sizes. The effect was sustained over 12 weeks of follow-up. At baseline, only 0.3% of younger adults and 2.3% of older adults reported normal QoL, which significantly increased to, respectively, 19.8 and 19.4% by the end of treatment, and 23.7 and 26.8% at the 12-week follow-up.

Conclusions: rTMS yielded acute and sustained clinically meaningful improvements in QoL, with similar effects among younger and older adults with depression. The magnitude of improvement was comparable to, or exceeded, that reported in antidepressant trials.

rTMS对青年和老年重度抑郁症患者自我报告生活质量的影响。
背景:重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)是治疗难治性抑郁症的一种行之有效的干预措施。然而,它对患者报告的结果的影响,如生活质量(QoL),尚未完全表征,特别是在老年人中。本研究比较了rTMS对年轻人生活质量的影响(方法:我们分析了来自两项随机临床试验(3d和4d)的531名抑郁症患者(年龄18-89岁)的数据。所有参与者接受单侧或双侧rTMS或θ波脉冲刺激。在基线、治疗结束和12周随访时,使用生活质量享受和满意度问卷-简表评估生活质量,并比较年轻人(年龄n = 360)和老年人(年龄≥60岁,n = 171)。通过效应量评估这些变化的临床相关性,使用预定义的阈值12分作为最小临床重要差异,并与社区规范进行比较。结果:经rTMS治疗后,年轻人和老年人的生活质量均有统计学意义上的显著改善,效应量中到大。这种效果持续了12周的随访。在基线时,只有0.3%的年轻人和2.3%的老年人报告正常的生活质量,在治疗结束时分别显著增加到19.8%和19.4%,在12周随访时分别增加到23.7%和26.8%。结论:rTMS对生活质量产生了急性和持续的有临床意义的改善,在年轻和老年抑郁症患者中效果相似。改善的幅度与抗抑郁药试验报告的相当或超过。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychological Medicine
Psychological Medicine 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
711
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Now in its fifth decade of publication, Psychological Medicine is a leading international journal in the fields of psychiatry, related aspects of psychology and basic sciences. From 2014, there are 16 issues a year, each featuring original articles reporting key research being undertaken worldwide, together with shorter editorials by distinguished scholars and an important book review section. The journal''s success is clearly demonstrated by a consistently high impact factor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信