Diagnostic performance of point-of-care bilirubin testing with Bilistick 2.0 device at a South Indian clinical site.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Mangalabharathi Sundaram, Arunkumar Muthusamy, Anitha Balachandran, Muthukumaran Natarajan
{"title":"Diagnostic performance of point-of-care bilirubin testing with Bilistick 2.0 device at a South Indian clinical site.","authors":"Mangalabharathi Sundaram, Arunkumar Muthusamy, Anitha Balachandran, Muthukumaran Natarajan","doi":"10.1038/s41390-025-04431-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neonatal hyperbilirubinemia is common in India, yet many public hospitals lack access to reliable and timely bilirubin testing. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of a point-of-care (POC) bilirubin device, Bilistick 2.0, in a high-volume neonatal setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective diagnostic accuracy study at Madras Medical College, Chennai. Neonates ≥28 weeks and ≤10 days old with jaundice or at high risk were enrolled. Paired TSB samples (Bilistick and reference lab) were collected from 153 neonates. Bland-Altman analysis, correlation, and subgroup comparisons were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 153 paired samples, 137 non-hemolyzed pairs were analyzed. Mean TSB was 14.39 ± 4.03 mg/dL (Bilistick) vs. 14.27 ± 3.73 mg/dL (reference). Mean absolute difference was 1.35 mg/dL; 79% of values were within ±2 mg/dL. Mean bias was +0.13 mg/dL. Correlation was r = 0.88 overall, and r = 0.96 for TSB > 20 mg/dL. Test failure rate was 10.5%, mostly during the initial learning phase.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bilistick 2.0 showed strong diagnostic agreement with reference laboratory bilirubin testing. With training and basic laboratory coordination, it may support safe, rapid bilirubin management in resource-limited neonatal care.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>The Bilistick 2.0 point-of-care device showed strong diagnostic agreement with reference laboratory bilirubin testing. Performance remained reliable in neonates with clinically significant bilirubin levels, especially >20 mg/dL. Turnaround time was under 15 min, and user-related test failures decreased after brief training. The device has potential for decentralized bilirubin monitoring in public-sector neonatal care in India.</p>","PeriodicalId":19829,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-025-04431-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Neonatal hyperbilirubinemia is common in India, yet many public hospitals lack access to reliable and timely bilirubin testing. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of a point-of-care (POC) bilirubin device, Bilistick 2.0, in a high-volume neonatal setting.

Methods: We conducted a prospective diagnostic accuracy study at Madras Medical College, Chennai. Neonates ≥28 weeks and ≤10 days old with jaundice or at high risk were enrolled. Paired TSB samples (Bilistick and reference lab) were collected from 153 neonates. Bland-Altman analysis, correlation, and subgroup comparisons were performed.

Results: Of 153 paired samples, 137 non-hemolyzed pairs were analyzed. Mean TSB was 14.39 ± 4.03 mg/dL (Bilistick) vs. 14.27 ± 3.73 mg/dL (reference). Mean absolute difference was 1.35 mg/dL; 79% of values were within ±2 mg/dL. Mean bias was +0.13 mg/dL. Correlation was r = 0.88 overall, and r = 0.96 for TSB > 20 mg/dL. Test failure rate was 10.5%, mostly during the initial learning phase.

Conclusion: Bilistick 2.0 showed strong diagnostic agreement with reference laboratory bilirubin testing. With training and basic laboratory coordination, it may support safe, rapid bilirubin management in resource-limited neonatal care.

Impact: The Bilistick 2.0 point-of-care device showed strong diagnostic agreement with reference laboratory bilirubin testing. Performance remained reliable in neonates with clinically significant bilirubin levels, especially >20 mg/dL. Turnaround time was under 15 min, and user-related test failures decreased after brief training. The device has potential for decentralized bilirubin monitoring in public-sector neonatal care in India.

在南印度临床站点使用Bilistick 2.0设备进行即时胆红素检测的诊断性能。
背景:新生儿高胆红素血症在印度很常见,但许多公立医院缺乏可靠和及时的胆红素检测。我们评估了一种即时护理(POC)胆红素设备Bilistick 2.0在高容量新生儿环境中的诊断性能。方法:我们在金奈马德拉斯医学院进行了一项前瞻性诊断准确性研究。≥28周,≤10天的黄疸或高危新生儿纳入研究。从153名新生儿中采集配对TSB样本(Bilistick和参比实验室)。进行Bland-Altman分析、相关性分析和亚组比较。结果:153对配对样本中,分析了137对未溶血的样本。平均TSB分别为14.39±4.03 mg/dL (Bilistick)和14.27±3.73 mg/dL(参比)。平均绝对差值为1.35 mg/dL;79%的数值在±2mg /dL范围内。平均偏倚为+0.13 mg/dL。总体相关r = 0.88, TSB > 20 mg/dL相关r = 0.96。测试失败率为10.5%,主要是在初始学习阶段。结论:Bilistick 2.0与参考实验室胆红素检测具有较强的诊断一致性。通过培训和基本的实验室协调,它可以在资源有限的新生儿护理中支持安全、快速的胆红素管理。影响:Bilistick 2.0点护理设备与参考实验室胆红素检测显示出很强的诊断一致性。对于胆红素水平显著的新生儿,尤其是胆红素水平达到20 mg/dL的新生儿,其表现仍然可靠。周转时间在15分钟以内,并且在简短的培训之后,用户相关的测试失败减少了。该设备在印度公共部门新生儿护理中具有分散胆红素监测的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Research
Pediatric Research 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
473
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Research publishes original papers, invited reviews, and commentaries on the etiologies of children''s diseases and disorders of development, extending from molecular biology to epidemiology. Use of model organisms and in vitro techniques relevant to developmental biology and medicine are acceptable, as are translational human studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信