The effects of a dietitian-supported multidisciplinary nutrition intervention on optimizing nutrition care in older patients with hip fracture and at nutrition risk-A quality improvement study.
Tina Munk, Anne Marie Beck, Cecilie M Møller, Frederikke E Pudselykke, Guro Ø H Mikkelsen, Heidrun T Filtenborg, Trine S Pedersen, Jens Peter Alva-Jørgensen, Anne W Knudsen
{"title":"The effects of a dietitian-supported multidisciplinary nutrition intervention on optimizing nutrition care in older patients with hip fracture and at nutrition risk-A quality improvement study.","authors":"Tina Munk, Anne Marie Beck, Cecilie M Møller, Frederikke E Pudselykke, Guro Ø H Mikkelsen, Heidrun T Filtenborg, Trine S Pedersen, Jens Peter Alva-Jørgensen, Anne W Knudsen","doi":"10.1002/ncp.70049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A 1-day cross-sectional study at our hospital found that only 22% of patients with hip fractures at nutrition risk met their energy and protein requirements during hospitalization. This study aimed to test whether closer collaboration between a clinical dietitian and ward staff, guided by the Model for Improvement, could optimize nutrition care for hospitalized older patients with hip fractures at nutrition risk.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A dietitian was embedded to facilitate staff-led enhancements in nutrition care at an orthopedic ward in from September to December 2024. Two Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles were implemented. Cycle 1 focused on nutrition documentation. Cycle 2 targeted nutrition intake. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients meeting individual energy and protein requirements (≥80%). Secondary process indicators were (1) ≥80% of patients screened using Nutrition Risk Screening 2002, and (2) ≥80% of at-risk patients with intake documented in the medical record. Preintervention data served as the baseline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary outcome was achieved, with 80% (8 of 10) of patients meeting both energy and protein requirements, a significant improvement from 22% (2 of 9) at baseline (P < 0.05). Documentation of nutrition risk increased from 10% (1 of 10) to 80% (8 of 10) (P < 0.01), and intake documentation improved from 30% (3 of 10) to 100% (10 of 10) (P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This quality improvement study demonstrates that applying the Model for Improvement to integrate a clinical dietitian into ward practice strengthened interdisciplinary nutrition care and led to measurable gains in screening, documentation, and nutrition intake among older patients with hip fractures at nutrition risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":19354,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.70049","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: A 1-day cross-sectional study at our hospital found that only 22% of patients with hip fractures at nutrition risk met their energy and protein requirements during hospitalization. This study aimed to test whether closer collaboration between a clinical dietitian and ward staff, guided by the Model for Improvement, could optimize nutrition care for hospitalized older patients with hip fractures at nutrition risk.
Method: A dietitian was embedded to facilitate staff-led enhancements in nutrition care at an orthopedic ward in from September to December 2024. Two Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles were implemented. Cycle 1 focused on nutrition documentation. Cycle 2 targeted nutrition intake. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients meeting individual energy and protein requirements (≥80%). Secondary process indicators were (1) ≥80% of patients screened using Nutrition Risk Screening 2002, and (2) ≥80% of at-risk patients with intake documented in the medical record. Preintervention data served as the baseline.
Results: The primary outcome was achieved, with 80% (8 of 10) of patients meeting both energy and protein requirements, a significant improvement from 22% (2 of 9) at baseline (P < 0.05). Documentation of nutrition risk increased from 10% (1 of 10) to 80% (8 of 10) (P < 0.01), and intake documentation improved from 30% (3 of 10) to 100% (10 of 10) (P < 0.01).
Conclusion: This quality improvement study demonstrates that applying the Model for Improvement to integrate a clinical dietitian into ward practice strengthened interdisciplinary nutrition care and led to measurable gains in screening, documentation, and nutrition intake among older patients with hip fractures at nutrition risk.
期刊介绍:
NCP is a peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary publication that publishes articles about the scientific basis and clinical application of nutrition and nutrition support. NCP contains comprehensive reviews, clinical research, case observations, and other types of papers written by experts in the field of nutrition and health care practitioners involved in the delivery of specialized nutrition support. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).