The effects of a dietitian-supported multidisciplinary nutrition intervention on optimizing nutrition care in older patients with hip fracture and at nutrition risk-A quality improvement study.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Tina Munk, Anne Marie Beck, Cecilie M Møller, Frederikke E Pudselykke, Guro Ø H Mikkelsen, Heidrun T Filtenborg, Trine S Pedersen, Jens Peter Alva-Jørgensen, Anne W Knudsen
{"title":"The effects of a dietitian-supported multidisciplinary nutrition intervention on optimizing nutrition care in older patients with hip fracture and at nutrition risk-A quality improvement study.","authors":"Tina Munk, Anne Marie Beck, Cecilie M Møller, Frederikke E Pudselykke, Guro Ø H Mikkelsen, Heidrun T Filtenborg, Trine S Pedersen, Jens Peter Alva-Jørgensen, Anne W Knudsen","doi":"10.1002/ncp.70049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A 1-day cross-sectional study at our hospital found that only 22% of patients with hip fractures at nutrition risk met their energy and protein requirements during hospitalization. This study aimed to test whether closer collaboration between a clinical dietitian and ward staff, guided by the Model for Improvement, could optimize nutrition care for hospitalized older patients with hip fractures at nutrition risk.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A dietitian was embedded to facilitate staff-led enhancements in nutrition care at an orthopedic ward in from September to December 2024. Two Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles were implemented. Cycle 1 focused on nutrition documentation. Cycle 2 targeted nutrition intake. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients meeting individual energy and protein requirements (≥80%). Secondary process indicators were (1) ≥80% of patients screened using Nutrition Risk Screening 2002, and (2) ≥80% of at-risk patients with intake documented in the medical record. Preintervention data served as the baseline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary outcome was achieved, with 80% (8 of 10) of patients meeting both energy and protein requirements, a significant improvement from 22% (2 of 9) at baseline (P < 0.05). Documentation of nutrition risk increased from 10% (1 of 10) to 80% (8 of 10) (P < 0.01), and intake documentation improved from 30% (3 of 10) to 100% (10 of 10) (P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This quality improvement study demonstrates that applying the Model for Improvement to integrate a clinical dietitian into ward practice strengthened interdisciplinary nutrition care and led to measurable gains in screening, documentation, and nutrition intake among older patients with hip fractures at nutrition risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":19354,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.70049","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: A 1-day cross-sectional study at our hospital found that only 22% of patients with hip fractures at nutrition risk met their energy and protein requirements during hospitalization. This study aimed to test whether closer collaboration between a clinical dietitian and ward staff, guided by the Model for Improvement, could optimize nutrition care for hospitalized older patients with hip fractures at nutrition risk.

Method: A dietitian was embedded to facilitate staff-led enhancements in nutrition care at an orthopedic ward in from September to December 2024. Two Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles were implemented. Cycle 1 focused on nutrition documentation. Cycle 2 targeted nutrition intake. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients meeting individual energy and protein requirements (≥80%). Secondary process indicators were (1) ≥80% of patients screened using Nutrition Risk Screening 2002, and (2) ≥80% of at-risk patients with intake documented in the medical record. Preintervention data served as the baseline.

Results: The primary outcome was achieved, with 80% (8 of 10) of patients meeting both energy and protein requirements, a significant improvement from 22% (2 of 9) at baseline (P < 0.05). Documentation of nutrition risk increased from 10% (1 of 10) to 80% (8 of 10) (P < 0.01), and intake documentation improved from 30% (3 of 10) to 100% (10 of 10) (P < 0.01).

Conclusion: This quality improvement study demonstrates that applying the Model for Improvement to integrate a clinical dietitian into ward practice strengthened interdisciplinary nutrition care and led to measurable gains in screening, documentation, and nutrition intake among older patients with hip fractures at nutrition risk.

营养学家支持的多学科营养干预对老年髋部骨折患者营养护理优化的影响-一项质量改善研究。
在我院进行的一项为期1天的横断面研究发现,只有22%的有营养风险的髋部骨折患者在住院期间满足了他们的能量和蛋白质需求。本研究旨在测试临床营养师和病房工作人员之间的密切合作,在改善模型的指导下,是否可以优化住院老年髋部骨折患者的营养护理。方法:于2024年9月至12月在某骨科病房嵌入一名营养师,以促进员工主导的营养护理。实施了两个计划-执行-研究-行动周期。周期1侧重于营养文献。周期2目标营养摄入。主要终点是满足个体能量和蛋白质需求的患者比例(≥80%)。次要过程指标为(1)2002年营养风险筛查筛查的患者≥80%,(2)医疗记录中记录摄入的高危患者≥80%。干预前数据作为基线。结果:主要结局得以实现,80%(8 / 10)的患者满足了能量和蛋白质的需求,比基线时的22%(2 / 9)有显著改善(P)。这项质量改善研究表明,应用改善模型将临床营养师整合到病房实践中,加强了跨学科营养护理,并在有营养风险的老年髋部骨折患者的筛查、记录和营养摄入方面取得了可衡量的成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
9.70%
发文量
128
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: NCP is a peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary publication that publishes articles about the scientific basis and clinical application of nutrition and nutrition support. NCP contains comprehensive reviews, clinical research, case observations, and other types of papers written by experts in the field of nutrition and health care practitioners involved in the delivery of specialized nutrition support. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信