Reducing medication errors in neurosurgery through clinical pharmacy interventions: a prospective observational study.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Aaron Lawson McLean, Anna Schlattl, Christian Senft, Michael Hartmann, Falko Schwarz
{"title":"Reducing medication errors in neurosurgery through clinical pharmacy interventions: a prospective observational study.","authors":"Aaron Lawson McLean, Anna Schlattl, Christian Senft, Michael Hartmann, Falko Schwarz","doi":"10.1007/s10143-025-03849-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neurosurgical patient care is inherently complex, characterized by high rates of polypharmacy, advanced age, and significant comorbidities, all of which increase the risk of medication errors. These challenges are compounded by dynamic treatment plans and intensive care demands. In response, clinical pharmacist-led \"pharmaceutical interventions\" have emerged as a promising strategy to enhance medication safety. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a structured weekly pharmacist-led medication review programme on prescribing practices and patient outcomes in a tertiary academic neurosurgical department. In this 12-month prospective study, a pharmacist performed weekly medication reviews on the neurosurgical ward and HDU. Interventions were coded in ADKA-DokuPIK and relayed to the team; 10% were re-audited to confirm uptake. The year was split into two six-month epochs to assess temporal trends. Administrative data from the intervention year were compared with a historical control for length of stay (LOS) and in-hospital mortality. Adverse-drug-event rates were not prospectively collected. A total of 996 interventions were documented among 1795 patients (0.55/patient). Intervention rates declined from 0.7 to 0.4 per patient between periods (p = 0.016), suggesting a learning effect. Implementation of recommendations was confirmed in 78% of audited cases. The most commonly affected drugs were pantoprazole (n = 77), amlodipine (n = 47), ciprofloxacin (n = 44). Median LOS decreased from 8.1 to 7.3 days (p = 0.032), the proportion of prolonged hospitalisations (> 14 days) fell from 18.9% to 14.8% (p = 0.002), and in-hospital mortality declined from 4.6% to 3.0% (p = 0.014). Routine integration of a clinical pharmacist into neurosurgical care was associated with fewer medication-related issues, measurable improvements in LOS and mortality, and evidence of progressive prescriber adaptation. These findings support broader implementation of pharmacist-led interventions in high-risk surgical environments. Controlled multicenter trials are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"48 1","pages":"687"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12511136/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03849-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neurosurgical patient care is inherently complex, characterized by high rates of polypharmacy, advanced age, and significant comorbidities, all of which increase the risk of medication errors. These challenges are compounded by dynamic treatment plans and intensive care demands. In response, clinical pharmacist-led "pharmaceutical interventions" have emerged as a promising strategy to enhance medication safety. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a structured weekly pharmacist-led medication review programme on prescribing practices and patient outcomes in a tertiary academic neurosurgical department. In this 12-month prospective study, a pharmacist performed weekly medication reviews on the neurosurgical ward and HDU. Interventions were coded in ADKA-DokuPIK and relayed to the team; 10% were re-audited to confirm uptake. The year was split into two six-month epochs to assess temporal trends. Administrative data from the intervention year were compared with a historical control for length of stay (LOS) and in-hospital mortality. Adverse-drug-event rates were not prospectively collected. A total of 996 interventions were documented among 1795 patients (0.55/patient). Intervention rates declined from 0.7 to 0.4 per patient between periods (p = 0.016), suggesting a learning effect. Implementation of recommendations was confirmed in 78% of audited cases. The most commonly affected drugs were pantoprazole (n = 77), amlodipine (n = 47), ciprofloxacin (n = 44). Median LOS decreased from 8.1 to 7.3 days (p = 0.032), the proportion of prolonged hospitalisations (> 14 days) fell from 18.9% to 14.8% (p = 0.002), and in-hospital mortality declined from 4.6% to 3.0% (p = 0.014). Routine integration of a clinical pharmacist into neurosurgical care was associated with fewer medication-related issues, measurable improvements in LOS and mortality, and evidence of progressive prescriber adaptation. These findings support broader implementation of pharmacist-led interventions in high-risk surgical environments. Controlled multicenter trials are warranted.

通过临床药学干预减少神经外科用药错误:一项前瞻性观察研究。
神经外科患者的护理本质上是复杂的,其特点是多种用药的高发率、高龄和显著的合并症,所有这些都增加了用药错误的风险。这些挑战因动态治疗计划和重症监护需求而更加复杂。因此,临床药师主导的“药物干预”已成为提高用药安全的一种有前景的策略。本研究旨在评估在三级学术神经外科,每周一次由药剂师主导的药物审查计划对处方实践和患者预后的影响。在这项为期12个月的前瞻性研究中,一名药剂师每周对神经外科病房和HDU进行药物审查。干预措施在ADKA-DokuPIK中编码并转发给团队;10%被重新审核以确认吸收。这一年被分为两个六个月的时期,以评估时间趋势。将干预年份的行政数据与住院时间(LOS)和住院死亡率的历史对照进行比较。未前瞻性地收集不良药物事件发生率。在1795例患者中,共记录了996项干预措施(0.55例/例)。干预率从每名患者0.7降至每名患者0.4 (p = 0.016),表明存在学习效应。经审计的案例中,有78%的建议得到了落实。最常见的影响药物为泮托拉唑(77例)、氨氯地平(47例)、环丙沙星(44例)。中位生存期从8.1天降至7.3天(p = 0.032),延长住院(bbb14天)的比例从18.9%降至14.8% (p = 0.002),住院死亡率从4.6%降至3.0% (p = 0.014)。临床药师在神经外科护理中的常规整合与药物相关问题的减少、LOS和死亡率的显著改善以及处方者逐渐适应的证据相关。这些发现支持在高风险手术环境中更广泛地实施药剂师主导的干预措施。有必要进行多中心对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurosurgical Review
Neurosurgical Review 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信