Lauren P Kane, Cara L Field, Lisabet M Hortensius, Carlos Rios, Abby M McClain, Emily R Whitmer, Claire Simeone, Sophie Dennison, Michael W Zabrodski, Pádraig Duignan
{"title":"ANTHELMINTIC THERAPIES FOR <i>PARAFILAROIDES DECORUS</i> PNEUMONIA IN CALIFORNIA SEA LIONS (<i>ZALOPHUS CALIFORNIANUS</i>).","authors":"Lauren P Kane, Cara L Field, Lisabet M Hortensius, Carlos Rios, Abby M McClain, Emily R Whitmer, Claire Simeone, Sophie Dennison, Michael W Zabrodski, Pádraig Duignan","doi":"10.1638/2024-0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Infection with the lungworm <i>Para</i>fi<i>laroides decorus</i> is ubiquitous among young California sea lions (CSL; <i>Zalophus californianus</i>), and high infection intensity is a significant cause of pulmonary pathology, respiratory distress, morbidity, and mortality. Anthelmintics are a common treatment for stranded CSL exhibiting clinical evidence of pneumonia in the rehabilitation setting. To evaluate the clinical efficacy of anthelmintics in reducing larval lungworm fecal output, 55 stranded pup and yearling CSL were treated with either parenteral moxidectin or oral fenbendazole and compared with a group that did not receive an anthelmintic. Clinical disease scoring initially revealed 1 animal to not have disease, 37 animals to have mild to moderate disease, and 17 animals to have severe disease secondary to <i>P. decorus</i> infection. Initial posttreatment fecal recheck scored animals as improved (n = 30), unchanged (n = 14), worsened (n = 2), or dead (n = 9). There was no difference between treatment groups and changes in clinical scores on the basis of clinical signs, nor was there a difference between treatment groups and change of <i>P. decorus</i> presence. There is insufficient evidence to indicate that oral fenbendazole or subcutaneous moxidectin is superior for parasitic pneumonia therapy due to <i>P. decorus</i> in CSL.</p>","PeriodicalId":17667,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine","volume":"56 3","pages":"515-524"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1638/2024-0021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Infection with the lungworm Parafilaroides decorus is ubiquitous among young California sea lions (CSL; Zalophus californianus), and high infection intensity is a significant cause of pulmonary pathology, respiratory distress, morbidity, and mortality. Anthelmintics are a common treatment for stranded CSL exhibiting clinical evidence of pneumonia in the rehabilitation setting. To evaluate the clinical efficacy of anthelmintics in reducing larval lungworm fecal output, 55 stranded pup and yearling CSL were treated with either parenteral moxidectin or oral fenbendazole and compared with a group that did not receive an anthelmintic. Clinical disease scoring initially revealed 1 animal to not have disease, 37 animals to have mild to moderate disease, and 17 animals to have severe disease secondary to P. decorus infection. Initial posttreatment fecal recheck scored animals as improved (n = 30), unchanged (n = 14), worsened (n = 2), or dead (n = 9). There was no difference between treatment groups and changes in clinical scores on the basis of clinical signs, nor was there a difference between treatment groups and change of P. decorus presence. There is insufficient evidence to indicate that oral fenbendazole or subcutaneous moxidectin is superior for parasitic pneumonia therapy due to P. decorus in CSL.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine (JZWM) is considered one of the major sources of information on the biology and veterinary aspects in the field. It stems from the founding premise of AAZV to share zoo animal medicine experiences. The Journal evolved from the long history of members producing case reports and the increased publication of free-ranging wildlife papers.
The Journal accepts manuscripts of original research findings, case reports in the field of veterinary medicine dealing with captive and free-ranging wild animals, brief communications regarding clinical or research observations that may warrant publication. It also publishes and encourages submission of relevant editorials, reviews, special reports, clinical challenges, abstracts of selected articles and book reviews. The Journal is published quarterly, is peer reviewed, is indexed by the major abstracting services, and is international in scope and distribution.
Areas of interest include clinical medicine, surgery, anatomy, radiology, physiology, reproduction, nutrition, parasitology, microbiology, immunology, pathology (including infectious diseases and clinical pathology), toxicology, pharmacology, and epidemiology.