Savannah N Dunn, Olivia N Clark, Kayla L Bonadie, Gregory A Lewbart
{"title":"CLINICAL OVERVIEW OF SNAKES PRESENTING TO A NORTH CAROLINA WILDLIFE CLINIC: A 25-YEAR RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW (1999-2023).","authors":"Savannah N Dunn, Olivia N Clark, Kayla L Bonadie, Gregory A Lewbart","doi":"10.1638/2024-0119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over a 25-year period (1999-2023), 152 free-ranging snakes were presented to the Turtle Rescue Team at the North Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine. Snakes presented in all months of the year, with 73.7% arriving from May to September. The black rat snake (<i>Pantherophis</i> spp.) was the most frequent species admitted, representing 45.4% (n = 69) of the caseload, followed by black racers (<i>Coluber constrictor</i>; n = 29 [19.1%]) and water snakes (<i>Nerodia</i> spp.; n = 16, [10.5%]). Median length of stay for admitted snakes was 11 days, which increased to 18 days when snakes that were either dead or euthanized on arrival were excluded. The majority of snakes (n = 97 [69.8%]) stayed 30 days or fewer. Trauma was the most common reason for admission, and over 50% of all cases could be definitively linked to anthropogenic factors. Trauma from netting entanglement was the most prevalent presenting complaint, at 19.1% (n = 29) of the total caseload. However, snakes presenting for netting trauma were 2.6x more likely to survive when compared to all other presenting complaints. Overall, 40.1% (n = 61) snakes were released. Including one nonreleasable snake and one that escaped care, 63 (44.1%) of the 152 survived. This study provides an introductory look at the clinical overview of snakes presenting to a North Carolina wildlife rehabilitation center, and allows for a better understanding of both factors affecting these animals in the wild and the feasibility of successful rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":17667,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine","volume":"56 3","pages":"507-514"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1638/2024-0119","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Over a 25-year period (1999-2023), 152 free-ranging snakes were presented to the Turtle Rescue Team at the North Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine. Snakes presented in all months of the year, with 73.7% arriving from May to September. The black rat snake (Pantherophis spp.) was the most frequent species admitted, representing 45.4% (n = 69) of the caseload, followed by black racers (Coluber constrictor; n = 29 [19.1%]) and water snakes (Nerodia spp.; n = 16, [10.5%]). Median length of stay for admitted snakes was 11 days, which increased to 18 days when snakes that were either dead or euthanized on arrival were excluded. The majority of snakes (n = 97 [69.8%]) stayed 30 days or fewer. Trauma was the most common reason for admission, and over 50% of all cases could be definitively linked to anthropogenic factors. Trauma from netting entanglement was the most prevalent presenting complaint, at 19.1% (n = 29) of the total caseload. However, snakes presenting for netting trauma were 2.6x more likely to survive when compared to all other presenting complaints. Overall, 40.1% (n = 61) snakes were released. Including one nonreleasable snake and one that escaped care, 63 (44.1%) of the 152 survived. This study provides an introductory look at the clinical overview of snakes presenting to a North Carolina wildlife rehabilitation center, and allows for a better understanding of both factors affecting these animals in the wild and the feasibility of successful rehabilitation.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine (JZWM) is considered one of the major sources of information on the biology and veterinary aspects in the field. It stems from the founding premise of AAZV to share zoo animal medicine experiences. The Journal evolved from the long history of members producing case reports and the increased publication of free-ranging wildlife papers.
The Journal accepts manuscripts of original research findings, case reports in the field of veterinary medicine dealing with captive and free-ranging wild animals, brief communications regarding clinical or research observations that may warrant publication. It also publishes and encourages submission of relevant editorials, reviews, special reports, clinical challenges, abstracts of selected articles and book reviews. The Journal is published quarterly, is peer reviewed, is indexed by the major abstracting services, and is international in scope and distribution.
Areas of interest include clinical medicine, surgery, anatomy, radiology, physiology, reproduction, nutrition, parasitology, microbiology, immunology, pathology (including infectious diseases and clinical pathology), toxicology, pharmacology, and epidemiology.