Jorge L Alió Del Barrio, Pilar Yébana, Ana B Plaza-Puche, David Teren, Antonio Martínez-Abad, Mario Cantó-Cerdán
{"title":"Visual Outcomes After Bilateral Implantation of a Trifocal Intraocular Lens Pairing Two Complementary Optic Light Distributions.","authors":"Jorge L Alió Del Barrio, Pilar Yébana, Ana B Plaza-Puche, David Teren, Antonio Martínez-Abad, Mario Cantó-Cerdán","doi":"10.3928/1081597X-20250813-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess visual, refractive, and optical outcomes and patient-reported satisfaction following bilateral implantation of two trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) sharing the same optical architecture but differing in their photopic light distribution: Vivinex Gemetric and Vivinex Gemetric Plus (HOYA Surgical Optics).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an observational, prospective, consecutive, non-comparative case series. Fifty-four eyes of 27 patients underwent bilateral cataract surgery or refractive lens exchange. Each patient received the Gemetric IOL in the dominant eye and the Gemetric Plus in the non-dominant eye. Examinations included full refractive and visual assessment, defocus curves, mesopic contrast sensitivity, pyramidal aberrometry, and validated patient-reported outcome measures (Quality of Vision Questionnaire and Near Activity Visual Questionnaire), with follow-up at 1 day and 1, 3, and 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The paired IOL combination provided a visual acuity of 0.15 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) or better between defocus levels of +0.50 to -3.00 diopters (D). Maximum mean value of visual acuity was obtained at 0.00 D (-0.07 ± 0.05 logMAR) and a second peak was found at -3.00 D (0.07 ± 0.09 logMAR). It was 0.13 ± 0.10 logMAR at a defocus level of -1.50 D. Monocular corrected near visual acuity was significantly better for the Gemetric Plus IOL (<i>P</i> = .03). Better monocular distance visual function was obtained with the Gemetric IOL (<i>P</i> = .05). Contrast sensitivity remained within or above age-matched normative values. Ocular aberrations remained low and stable, with no significant differences between lens types. Ninety-six percent of patients reported no or minor difficulties in conducting prolonged near work.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The pairing strategy of the Vivinex Gemetric and Gemetric Plus trifocal IOLs delivers excellent visual acuity across all distances, preserves contrast sensitivity, and maintains a high level of optical quality and patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":16951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of refractive surgery","volume":"41 10","pages":"e1106-e1114"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20250813-03","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To assess visual, refractive, and optical outcomes and patient-reported satisfaction following bilateral implantation of two trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) sharing the same optical architecture but differing in their photopic light distribution: Vivinex Gemetric and Vivinex Gemetric Plus (HOYA Surgical Optics).
Methods: This was an observational, prospective, consecutive, non-comparative case series. Fifty-four eyes of 27 patients underwent bilateral cataract surgery or refractive lens exchange. Each patient received the Gemetric IOL in the dominant eye and the Gemetric Plus in the non-dominant eye. Examinations included full refractive and visual assessment, defocus curves, mesopic contrast sensitivity, pyramidal aberrometry, and validated patient-reported outcome measures (Quality of Vision Questionnaire and Near Activity Visual Questionnaire), with follow-up at 1 day and 1, 3, and 6 months.
Results: The paired IOL combination provided a visual acuity of 0.15 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) or better between defocus levels of +0.50 to -3.00 diopters (D). Maximum mean value of visual acuity was obtained at 0.00 D (-0.07 ± 0.05 logMAR) and a second peak was found at -3.00 D (0.07 ± 0.09 logMAR). It was 0.13 ± 0.10 logMAR at a defocus level of -1.50 D. Monocular corrected near visual acuity was significantly better for the Gemetric Plus IOL (P = .03). Better monocular distance visual function was obtained with the Gemetric IOL (P = .05). Contrast sensitivity remained within or above age-matched normative values. Ocular aberrations remained low and stable, with no significant differences between lens types. Ninety-six percent of patients reported no or minor difficulties in conducting prolonged near work.
Conclusions: The pairing strategy of the Vivinex Gemetric and Gemetric Plus trifocal IOLs delivers excellent visual acuity across all distances, preserves contrast sensitivity, and maintains a high level of optical quality and patient satisfaction.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Refractive Surgery, the official journal of the International Society of Refractive Surgery, a partner of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, has been a monthly peer-reviewed forum for original research, review, and evaluation of refractive and lens-based surgical procedures for more than 30 years. Practical, clinically valuable articles provide readers with the most up-to-date information regarding advances in the field of refractive surgery. Begin to explore the Journal and all of its great benefits such as:
• Columns including “Translational Science,” “Surgical Techniques,” and “Biomechanics”
• Supplemental videos and materials available for many articles
• Access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content
• Articles posted online just 2 months after acceptance.