Revisiting Marriage and Physical and Mental Health Among Partnered Gay and Lesbian Adults: An Analysis of Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Data, 2014-2023.
IF 3.5 2区 医学Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
{"title":"Revisiting Marriage and Physical and Mental Health Among Partnered Gay and Lesbian Adults: An Analysis of Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Data, 2014-2023.","authors":"Haoming Song","doi":"10.1177/23258292251385566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> The purpose of this study was to reexamine the association between marriage and health among partnered gay and lesbian adults, comparing married individuals with those in unmarried couples. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Using a decade of large-scale, representative data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2014-2023, we analyzed partnered, cisgender gay and lesbian adults aged 18-65 (<i>N</i> = 10,973). Negative binomial regression models estimated the number of poor mental and physical health days, whereas logistic regression models predicted the probability of frequent mental and physical distress. Analyses adjusted for sociodemographic factors and explored the role of socioeconomic factors. To enhance comparability between married and partnered, unmarried individuals, a propensity score-based inverse probability weighting approach was adopted. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Married gay and lesbian individuals exhibited mental and physical health comparable to their partnered, unmarried counterparts. However, an exception was that married gay men experienced a mental health advantage, even after adjusting for socioeconomic resources. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The mental health advantage among married gay men highlights the importance of symbolic resources such as social recognition. Overall, however, the findings did not support the marital advantage theory among partnered lesbian and gay individuals, potentially due to the weaker institutionalization of same-sex marriage and elevated couple-level minority stress. Future research should further investigate sexual minority health within family contexts, incorporating diverse gender and sexual identities.</p>","PeriodicalId":18062,"journal":{"name":"LGBT health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LGBT health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23258292251385566","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to reexamine the association between marriage and health among partnered gay and lesbian adults, comparing married individuals with those in unmarried couples. Methods: Using a decade of large-scale, representative data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2014-2023, we analyzed partnered, cisgender gay and lesbian adults aged 18-65 (N = 10,973). Negative binomial regression models estimated the number of poor mental and physical health days, whereas logistic regression models predicted the probability of frequent mental and physical distress. Analyses adjusted for sociodemographic factors and explored the role of socioeconomic factors. To enhance comparability between married and partnered, unmarried individuals, a propensity score-based inverse probability weighting approach was adopted. Results: Married gay and lesbian individuals exhibited mental and physical health comparable to their partnered, unmarried counterparts. However, an exception was that married gay men experienced a mental health advantage, even after adjusting for socioeconomic resources. Conclusion: The mental health advantage among married gay men highlights the importance of symbolic resources such as social recognition. Overall, however, the findings did not support the marital advantage theory among partnered lesbian and gay individuals, potentially due to the weaker institutionalization of same-sex marriage and elevated couple-level minority stress. Future research should further investigate sexual minority health within family contexts, incorporating diverse gender and sexual identities.
LGBT healthPUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
80
期刊介绍:
LGBT Health is the premier peer-reviewed journal dedicated to promoting optimal healthcare for millions of sexual and gender minority persons worldwide by focusing specifically on health while maintaining sufficient breadth to encompass the full range of relevant biopsychosocial and health policy issues. This Journal aims to promote greater awareness of the health concerns particular to each sexual minority population, and to improve availability and delivery of culturally appropriate healthcare services. LGBT Health also encourages further research and increased funding in this critical but currently underserved domain. The Journal provides a much-needed authoritative source and international forum in all areas pertinent to LGBT health and healthcare services. Contributions from all continents are solicited including Asia and Africa which are currently underrepresented in sex research.