Revisiting Marriage and Physical and Mental Health Among Partnered Gay and Lesbian Adults: An Analysis of Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Data, 2014-2023.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Haoming Song
{"title":"Revisiting Marriage and Physical and Mental Health Among Partnered Gay and Lesbian Adults: An Analysis of Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Data, 2014-2023.","authors":"Haoming Song","doi":"10.1177/23258292251385566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> The purpose of this study was to reexamine the association between marriage and health among partnered gay and lesbian adults, comparing married individuals with those in unmarried couples. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Using a decade of large-scale, representative data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2014-2023, we analyzed partnered, cisgender gay and lesbian adults aged 18-65 (<i>N</i> = 10,973). Negative binomial regression models estimated the number of poor mental and physical health days, whereas logistic regression models predicted the probability of frequent mental and physical distress. Analyses adjusted for sociodemographic factors and explored the role of socioeconomic factors. To enhance comparability between married and partnered, unmarried individuals, a propensity score-based inverse probability weighting approach was adopted. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Married gay and lesbian individuals exhibited mental and physical health comparable to their partnered, unmarried counterparts. However, an exception was that married gay men experienced a mental health advantage, even after adjusting for socioeconomic resources. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The mental health advantage among married gay men highlights the importance of symbolic resources such as social recognition. Overall, however, the findings did not support the marital advantage theory among partnered lesbian and gay individuals, potentially due to the weaker institutionalization of same-sex marriage and elevated couple-level minority stress. Future research should further investigate sexual minority health within family contexts, incorporating diverse gender and sexual identities.</p>","PeriodicalId":18062,"journal":{"name":"LGBT health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LGBT health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23258292251385566","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to reexamine the association between marriage and health among partnered gay and lesbian adults, comparing married individuals with those in unmarried couples. Methods: Using a decade of large-scale, representative data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2014-2023, we analyzed partnered, cisgender gay and lesbian adults aged 18-65 (N = 10,973). Negative binomial regression models estimated the number of poor mental and physical health days, whereas logistic regression models predicted the probability of frequent mental and physical distress. Analyses adjusted for sociodemographic factors and explored the role of socioeconomic factors. To enhance comparability between married and partnered, unmarried individuals, a propensity score-based inverse probability weighting approach was adopted. Results: Married gay and lesbian individuals exhibited mental and physical health comparable to their partnered, unmarried counterparts. However, an exception was that married gay men experienced a mental health advantage, even after adjusting for socioeconomic resources. Conclusion: The mental health advantage among married gay men highlights the importance of symbolic resources such as social recognition. Overall, however, the findings did not support the marital advantage theory among partnered lesbian and gay individuals, potentially due to the weaker institutionalization of same-sex marriage and elevated couple-level minority stress. Future research should further investigate sexual minority health within family contexts, incorporating diverse gender and sexual identities.

2014-2023年同性恋伴侣婚姻与身心健康:行为风险因素监测系统数据分析
目的:本研究的目的是在有伴侣的男女同性恋成年人中,比较已婚和未婚夫妇,重新审视婚姻与健康之间的关系。方法:利用2014-2023年行为风险因素监测系统(Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System) 10年的大规模代表性数据,我们分析了18-65岁的异性恋男女同性恋(N = 10,973)。负二项回归模型估计精神和身体健康状况不佳的天数,而逻辑回归模型预测频繁出现精神和身体困扰的概率。分析调整了社会人口因素,并探讨了社会经济因素的作用。为了提高已婚个体与未婚伴侣个体之间的可比性,采用了基于倾向得分的逆概率加权方法。结果:已婚男女同性恋者的心理和身体健康状况与未婚伴侣相当。然而,一个例外是,即使在调整了社会经济资源之后,已婚的男同性恋者在心理健康方面也有优势。结论:已婚男同性恋者的心理健康优势突出了社会认可等象征性资源的重要性。然而,总的来说,研究结果并不支持有伴侣的男女同性恋者的婚姻优势理论,这可能是由于同性婚姻的制度化程度较弱,以及夫妻之间的少数族裔压力升高。未来的研究应进一步调查性少数群体在家庭背景下的健康状况,包括不同的性别和性身份。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
LGBT health
LGBT health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: LGBT Health is the premier peer-reviewed journal dedicated to promoting optimal healthcare for millions of sexual and gender minority persons worldwide by focusing specifically on health while maintaining sufficient breadth to encompass the full range of relevant biopsychosocial and health policy issues. This Journal aims to promote greater awareness of the health concerns particular to each sexual minority population, and to improve availability and delivery of culturally appropriate healthcare services. LGBT Health also encourages further research and increased funding in this critical but currently underserved domain. The Journal provides a much-needed authoritative source and international forum in all areas pertinent to LGBT health and healthcare services. Contributions from all continents are solicited including Asia and Africa which are currently underrepresented in sex research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信