Improving time-to-result: head-to-head comparison of three rapid AST systems for Gram-negative bacteremia, including the newly developed VITEK REVEAL.

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY
Damiano Squitieri, Giulia Menchinelli, Carlotta Magrì, Tiziana D'Inzeo, Barbara Fiori, Margherita Cacaci, Maurizio Sanguinetti, Giulia De Angelis, Brunella Posteraro
{"title":"Improving time-to-result: head-to-head comparison of three rapid AST systems for Gram-negative bacteremia, including the newly developed VITEK REVEAL.","authors":"Damiano Squitieri, Giulia Menchinelli, Carlotta Magrì, Tiziana D'Inzeo, Barbara Fiori, Margherita Cacaci, Maurizio Sanguinetti, Giulia De Angelis, Brunella Posteraro","doi":"10.1128/jcm.01050-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Early antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) in Gram-negative (GN) bloodstream infections is critical to guide appropriate therapy. This study evaluated three rapid AST (RAST) systems-VITEK REVEAL, direct-from-blood-culture VITEK 2 (VITEK 2-RAST), and EUCAST disk diffusion (DD-RAST)-using 220 prospectively collected GN-positive blood cultures (GN-PBCs). A total of 18 GN species were tested, including <i>Enterobacterales</i>, <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i>, and <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>, against 25 antibiotics, four of which were next-generation β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor (BL/BLI) antibiotics. Reference broth microdilution was used for comparison. The VITEK REVEAL assay showed 97.1% essential agreement (EA), -7.7 bias, and 98.3% categorical agreement (CA) across 3,603 organism/antibiotic combinations. The VITEK 2-RAST assay showed 96.2% EA, -10.4 bias, and 98.4% CA across 3,941 combinations. The DD-RAST assay showed 98.2% CA across 2,388 combinations. Among 164 GN-PBCs tested with all three assays, EA rates were 97.5% for VITEK REVEAL and 96.3% for VITEK 2-RAST, with bias values of -7.1 and -6.9, respectively. Across all three assays, the CA rate was ≥98.2%, and very major error (VME) rates were ≤1.8%. Mean time-to-result (TTR) was significantly shorter with VITEK REVEAL (6 h 32 min) compared to VITEK 2-RAST (13 h 51 min) and the fixed 8 h of DD-RAST. In resistant organisms, VITEK REVEAL produced significantly faster results than in susceptible or intermediate ones, including BL/BLI antibiotics. <i>A. baumannii</i> yielded the shortest TTR, with no observed VME. These results support the use of RAST directly on GN-PBCs, with VITEK REVEAL emerging as a particularly promising option for rapid and accurate testing.</p><p><strong>Importance: </strong>This study is the first to conduct a direct comparison of three rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) systems-VITEK REVEAL, VITEK 2-RAST, and DD-RAST-on a large, prospectively collected cohort of Gram-negative-positive blood cultures (GN-PBCs). The data offer valuable insights for laboratories evaluating RAST implementation, especially in EUCAST-based contexts. Among the systems tested, VITEK REVEAL stood out for its combination of rapid turnaround and high accuracy, including for antibiotic-resistant organisms and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor (BL/BLI) antibiotics. These findings underscore the potential of RAST systems to deliver timely and reliable susceptibility results directly from GN-PBCs, thereby supporting more effective antimicrobial stewardship and clinical decision-making. However, the real-world impact will also depend on how well these systems integrate into routine workflows, as seamless implementation can directly affect time-to-result (TTR)-an essential element in optimizing the management of GN-bloodstream infection (BSI).</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0105025"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01050-25","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Early antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) in Gram-negative (GN) bloodstream infections is critical to guide appropriate therapy. This study evaluated three rapid AST (RAST) systems-VITEK REVEAL, direct-from-blood-culture VITEK 2 (VITEK 2-RAST), and EUCAST disk diffusion (DD-RAST)-using 220 prospectively collected GN-positive blood cultures (GN-PBCs). A total of 18 GN species were tested, including Enterobacterales, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, against 25 antibiotics, four of which were next-generation β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor (BL/BLI) antibiotics. Reference broth microdilution was used for comparison. The VITEK REVEAL assay showed 97.1% essential agreement (EA), -7.7 bias, and 98.3% categorical agreement (CA) across 3,603 organism/antibiotic combinations. The VITEK 2-RAST assay showed 96.2% EA, -10.4 bias, and 98.4% CA across 3,941 combinations. The DD-RAST assay showed 98.2% CA across 2,388 combinations. Among 164 GN-PBCs tested with all three assays, EA rates were 97.5% for VITEK REVEAL and 96.3% for VITEK 2-RAST, with bias values of -7.1 and -6.9, respectively. Across all three assays, the CA rate was ≥98.2%, and very major error (VME) rates were ≤1.8%. Mean time-to-result (TTR) was significantly shorter with VITEK REVEAL (6 h 32 min) compared to VITEK 2-RAST (13 h 51 min) and the fixed 8 h of DD-RAST. In resistant organisms, VITEK REVEAL produced significantly faster results than in susceptible or intermediate ones, including BL/BLI antibiotics. A. baumannii yielded the shortest TTR, with no observed VME. These results support the use of RAST directly on GN-PBCs, with VITEK REVEAL emerging as a particularly promising option for rapid and accurate testing.

Importance: This study is the first to conduct a direct comparison of three rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) systems-VITEK REVEAL, VITEK 2-RAST, and DD-RAST-on a large, prospectively collected cohort of Gram-negative-positive blood cultures (GN-PBCs). The data offer valuable insights for laboratories evaluating RAST implementation, especially in EUCAST-based contexts. Among the systems tested, VITEK REVEAL stood out for its combination of rapid turnaround and high accuracy, including for antibiotic-resistant organisms and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor (BL/BLI) antibiotics. These findings underscore the potential of RAST systems to deliver timely and reliable susceptibility results directly from GN-PBCs, thereby supporting more effective antimicrobial stewardship and clinical decision-making. However, the real-world impact will also depend on how well these systems integrate into routine workflows, as seamless implementation can directly affect time-to-result (TTR)-an essential element in optimizing the management of GN-bloodstream infection (BSI).

改善获得结果的时间:对革兰氏阴性菌血症的三种快速AST系统进行正面比较,包括新开发的VITEK REVEAL。
革兰氏阴性(GN)血液感染的早期抗菌药物敏感性检测(AST)对于指导适当的治疗至关重要。本研究评估了三种快速AST (RAST)系统-VITEK REVEAL,直接从血液培养VITEK 2 (VITEK 2-RAST)和EUCAST磁盘扩散(DD-RAST)-使用220个前瞻性收集的gn阳性血液培养物(gn - pbc)。共检测肠杆菌、鲍曼不动杆菌、铜绿假单胞菌等18种GN对25种抗生素的耐药性,其中4种为新一代β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂(BL/BLI)抗生素。参照肉汤微量稀释法进行比较。VITEK REVEAL试验在3603种生物/抗生素组合中显示97.1%的基本一致性(EA), -7.7的偏倚和98.3%的分类一致性(CA)。VITEK 2-RAST分析在3,941个组合中显示96.2%的EA, -10.4偏倚和98.4%的CA。在2,388个组合中,DD-RAST检测显示CA为98.2%。在所有三种检测方法检测的164个gn - pbc中,VITEK REVEAL的EA率为97.5%,VITEK 2-RAST的EA率为96.3%,偏差值分别为-7.1和-6.9。在所有三项检测中,CA率≥98.2%,非常严重错误(VME)率≤1.8%。与VITEK 2-RAST (13 h 51 min)和DD-RAST固定的8 h相比,VITEK REVEAL的平均结果时间(TTR) (6 h 32 min)显著缩短。在耐药生物中,VITEK REVEAL产生的结果明显快于敏感或中间生物,包括BL/BLI抗生素。鲍曼不动杆菌的TTR最短,未观察到VME。这些结果支持直接在gn - pbc上使用RAST, VITEK REVEAL成为快速准确检测的特别有前途的选择。重要性:本研究首次在大量前瞻性收集的革兰氏阴性阳性血培养物(gn - pbc)队列上对三种快速抗菌药物敏感性试验(RAST)系统-VITEK REVEAL、VITEK 2-RAST和dd -RAST进行直接比较。这些数据为实验室评估RAST的实施提供了有价值的见解,特别是在基于eucast的环境中。在测试的系统中,VITEK REVEAL因其快速周转和高精度的结合而脱颖而出,包括抗生素耐药生物和β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂(BL/BLI)抗生素。这些发现强调了RAST系统直接从GN-PBCs中提供及时可靠的药敏结果的潜力,从而支持更有效的抗菌药物管理和临床决策。然而,现实世界的影响还将取决于这些系统与日常工作流程的整合程度,因为无缝实施可以直接影响时间到结果(TTR),这是优化gn血流感染(BSI)管理的基本要素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Journal of Clinical Microbiology 医学-微生物学
CiteScore
17.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
347
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Microbiology® disseminates the latest research concerning the laboratory diagnosis of human and animal infections, along with the laboratory's role in epidemiology and the management of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信