In vitro activity of antibiotic monotherapy and combination therapy with bacteriophages against Staphylococcus aureus LVAD-driveline infections.

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY
Michèle M Molendijk, Nelianne J Verkaik, Corné P de Vogel, Nicole Lemmens-den Toom, Gwenan M Knight, Kadir Caliskan, Lonneke G M Bode, Annelies Verbon, Marion P G Koopmans, Miranda de Graaf, Willem J B van Wamel
{"title":"<i>In vitro</i> activity of antibiotic monotherapy and combination therapy with bacteriophages against <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> LVAD-driveline infections.","authors":"Michèle M Molendijk, Nelianne J Verkaik, Corné P de Vogel, Nicole Lemmens-den Toom, Gwenan M Knight, Kadir Caliskan, Lonneke G M Bode, Annelies Verbon, Marion P G Koopmans, Miranda de Graaf, Willem J B van Wamel","doi":"10.1128/jcm.00272-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Left-ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are increasingly used as a bridge to heart transplantation and destination therapy. These devices, especially the driveline, are susceptible to difficult-to-treat infections, associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (<i>S. aureus</i>) is a major causative pathogen of LVAD infections. Antibiotic resistance and biofilm formation can complicate the treatment of these infections. A novel <i>in vitro</i> assay was developed to study the antibiotic susceptibility of <i>S. aureus</i> biofilm grown on LVAD drivelines. Besides antibiotic monotherapy, the effect of various antibiotics combined with rifampicin was studied. Additionally, we explored the efficacy of four individual phages and phage-antibiotic combinations as potential treatment strategies. Our data showed a decrease of susceptibility of the <i>S. aureus</i> biofilms to antibiotic monotherapy compared to planktonic <i>S. aureus</i>. With only rifampicin and erythromycin monotherapy resulting in full bacterial clearance. Combining antibiotics with rifampicin showed similar antimicrobial efficacy against <i>S. aureus</i> biofilms as rifampicin monotherapy. While both individual phages and a phage cocktail were effective against planktonic bacteria, phage efficacy was limited against <i>S. aureus</i> in biofilm. Combining phages with antibiotics did not clearly improve treatment efficacy, compared to antibiotic monotherapy. Contrarily, it even increased bacterial growth when phage administration preceded antibiotic treatment. Here, both antibiotic- and phage monotherapy showed reduced efficacy on LVAD-driveline biofilms. Additionally, phages did not show an additive value to antibiotic treatment of LVAD driveline infections. Further studies are needed to elucidate optimal treatment strategies for LVAD-driveline infections.IMPORTANCECurrent treatment strategies for <i>S. aureus</i> LVAD-driveline infections are based on <i>in vitro</i> antibiotic susceptibility of planktonic bacteria. However, LVAD infections are most often biofilm-related, which decreases antibiotic susceptibility significantly, resulting in discrepancies between <i>in vitro</i> antibiotic susceptibility and <i>in vivo</i> treatment success. Here, we have developed a novel <i>in vitro</i> assay to determine antibiotic susceptibility of <i>S. aureus</i> biofilm, grown in conditions relevant to LVAD-driveline infections. Next to antibiotic susceptibility, the susceptibility of this biofilm to bacteriophage mono- and combination treatment with antibiotics was evaluated as an alternative treatment strategy. In the future, this assay can be used to provide a better insight in <i>in vivo</i> antibiotic- and bacteriophage susceptibility of LVAD-driveline biofilms. Thereby improving <i>in vivo</i> treatment strategies for LVAD-driveline infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0027225"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.00272-25","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Left-ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are increasingly used as a bridge to heart transplantation and destination therapy. These devices, especially the driveline, are susceptible to difficult-to-treat infections, associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is a major causative pathogen of LVAD infections. Antibiotic resistance and biofilm formation can complicate the treatment of these infections. A novel in vitro assay was developed to study the antibiotic susceptibility of S. aureus biofilm grown on LVAD drivelines. Besides antibiotic monotherapy, the effect of various antibiotics combined with rifampicin was studied. Additionally, we explored the efficacy of four individual phages and phage-antibiotic combinations as potential treatment strategies. Our data showed a decrease of susceptibility of the S. aureus biofilms to antibiotic monotherapy compared to planktonic S. aureus. With only rifampicin and erythromycin monotherapy resulting in full bacterial clearance. Combining antibiotics with rifampicin showed similar antimicrobial efficacy against S. aureus biofilms as rifampicin monotherapy. While both individual phages and a phage cocktail were effective against planktonic bacteria, phage efficacy was limited against S. aureus in biofilm. Combining phages with antibiotics did not clearly improve treatment efficacy, compared to antibiotic monotherapy. Contrarily, it even increased bacterial growth when phage administration preceded antibiotic treatment. Here, both antibiotic- and phage monotherapy showed reduced efficacy on LVAD-driveline biofilms. Additionally, phages did not show an additive value to antibiotic treatment of LVAD driveline infections. Further studies are needed to elucidate optimal treatment strategies for LVAD-driveline infections.IMPORTANCECurrent treatment strategies for S. aureus LVAD-driveline infections are based on in vitro antibiotic susceptibility of planktonic bacteria. However, LVAD infections are most often biofilm-related, which decreases antibiotic susceptibility significantly, resulting in discrepancies between in vitro antibiotic susceptibility and in vivo treatment success. Here, we have developed a novel in vitro assay to determine antibiotic susceptibility of S. aureus biofilm, grown in conditions relevant to LVAD-driveline infections. Next to antibiotic susceptibility, the susceptibility of this biofilm to bacteriophage mono- and combination treatment with antibiotics was evaluated as an alternative treatment strategy. In the future, this assay can be used to provide a better insight in in vivo antibiotic- and bacteriophage susceptibility of LVAD-driveline biofilms. Thereby improving in vivo treatment strategies for LVAD-driveline infections.

抗生素单药和噬菌体联合治疗左心室辅助系统感染的体外活性研究。
左心室辅助装置(lvad)越来越多地被用作心脏移植和目的地治疗的桥梁。这些装置,特别是传动系统,容易受到难以治疗的感染,与高发病率和死亡率有关。金黄色葡萄球菌(S. aureus)是LVAD感染的主要致病菌。抗生素耐药性和生物膜的形成会使这些感染的治疗复杂化。建立了一种新的体外试验方法来研究在LVAD驱动系上生长的金黄色葡萄球菌生物膜的抗生素敏感性。除抗生素单药治疗外,还研究了各种抗生素与利福平联合治疗的效果。此外,我们探索了四种噬菌体和噬菌体-抗生素联合作为潜在治疗策略的疗效。我们的数据显示,与浮游金黄色葡萄球菌相比,金黄色葡萄球菌生物膜对抗生素单一治疗的敏感性降低。仅利福平和红霉素单药治疗可完全清除细菌。抗生素联合利福平对金黄色葡萄球菌生物膜的抗菌效果与利福平单药相似。虽然单个噬菌体和噬菌体鸡尾酒对浮游细菌都有效,但噬菌体对生物膜中的金黄色葡萄球菌的作用有限。与抗生素单药治疗相比,噬菌体联合抗生素治疗效果不明显。相反,如果在使用抗生素之前使用噬菌体,甚至会增加细菌的生长。在这里,抗生素和噬菌体单药治疗对lvad驱动系生物膜的疗效都有所降低。此外,噬菌体对LVAD驱动系统感染的抗生素治疗没有附加价值。需要进一步的研究来阐明lvad驱动系统感染的最佳治疗策略。当前金黄色葡萄球菌lvad驱动系感染的治疗策略是基于浮游细菌的体外抗生素敏感性。然而,LVAD感染通常与生物膜有关,这显著降低了抗生素的敏感性,导致体外抗生素敏感性与体内治疗成功率之间存在差异。在这里,我们开发了一种新的体外试验来确定在lvad驱动系统感染相关条件下生长的金黄色葡萄球菌生物膜的抗生素敏感性。除了抗生素敏感性,该生物膜对单一噬菌体和抗生素联合治疗的敏感性被评估为一种替代治疗策略。在未来,该试验可用于更好地了解lvad驱动系生物膜的体内抗生素和噬菌体敏感性。从而改善左心室辅助系统感染的体内治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Journal of Clinical Microbiology 医学-微生物学
CiteScore
17.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
347
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Microbiology® disseminates the latest research concerning the laboratory diagnosis of human and animal infections, along with the laboratory's role in epidemiology and the management of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信