Johanna Suskin, Keri Bergin, Morgan Baird, Joseph Lee, Alan B Copperman, Erkan Buyuk, Jovana Lekovich
{"title":"Single euploid embryo transfer outcomes following cancer and systemic chemotherapy.","authors":"Johanna Suskin, Keri Bergin, Morgan Baird, Joseph Lee, Alan B Copperman, Erkan Buyuk, Jovana Lekovich","doi":"10.1007/s10815-025-03686-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Systemic chemotherapy may impair future reproduction due to its gonadotoxic effects. There are limited data on pregnancy outcomes in patients with a history of chemotherapy who undergo single euploid embryo transfer (SEET).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included patients with prior chemotherapy who underwent SEET from 2011 to 2023. Cycles were matched 1:3 with controls by oocyte age, age at SEET, BMI, and year. Wilcoxon rank, chi-square, and adjusted logistic regression were used for analysis. A sub-analysis was performed to compare patients who had SEET using oocytes retrieved pre- and post-chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-five cycles from 32 patients with prior chemotherapy were matched to 165 control cycles. In the chemotherapy group, 23 cycles (41.8%) used embryos derived from oocytes pre-chemotherapy, while 32 cycles (58.2%) used embryos derived from oocytes post-chemotherapy. Endometrial thickness was significantly lower with prior chemotherapy vs. controls (8 mm vs 9 mm, respectively; p = 0.02). Ongoing pregnancy/live birth rate was similar in patients with prior chemotherapy and controls (56.4% vs. 57.0%, p = 0.94). Adjusted analysis confirmed the findings (aOR 1.5, CI 0.79-2.8, p = 0.21). Pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, and loss rates were similar. The subgroup analysis showed no statistical difference in outcomes in patients who used pre-chemotherapy vs. post-chemotherapy oocytes. However, a trend towards poorer outcomes in patients who used post-chemotherapy oocytes was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Outcomes after SEET in patients with prior chemotherapy are comparable to controls. A possible trend toward reduced success using post-chemotherapy oocytes warrants further investigation. Understanding the potential mechanisms by which chemotherapy may affect future fertility is important for survivorship care.</p>","PeriodicalId":15246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-025-03686-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Systemic chemotherapy may impair future reproduction due to its gonadotoxic effects. There are limited data on pregnancy outcomes in patients with a history of chemotherapy who undergo single euploid embryo transfer (SEET).
Materials and methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients with prior chemotherapy who underwent SEET from 2011 to 2023. Cycles were matched 1:3 with controls by oocyte age, age at SEET, BMI, and year. Wilcoxon rank, chi-square, and adjusted logistic regression were used for analysis. A sub-analysis was performed to compare patients who had SEET using oocytes retrieved pre- and post-chemotherapy.
Results: Fifty-five cycles from 32 patients with prior chemotherapy were matched to 165 control cycles. In the chemotherapy group, 23 cycles (41.8%) used embryos derived from oocytes pre-chemotherapy, while 32 cycles (58.2%) used embryos derived from oocytes post-chemotherapy. Endometrial thickness was significantly lower with prior chemotherapy vs. controls (8 mm vs 9 mm, respectively; p = 0.02). Ongoing pregnancy/live birth rate was similar in patients with prior chemotherapy and controls (56.4% vs. 57.0%, p = 0.94). Adjusted analysis confirmed the findings (aOR 1.5, CI 0.79-2.8, p = 0.21). Pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, and loss rates were similar. The subgroup analysis showed no statistical difference in outcomes in patients who used pre-chemotherapy vs. post-chemotherapy oocytes. However, a trend towards poorer outcomes in patients who used post-chemotherapy oocytes was observed.
Conclusions: Outcomes after SEET in patients with prior chemotherapy are comparable to controls. A possible trend toward reduced success using post-chemotherapy oocytes warrants further investigation. Understanding the potential mechanisms by which chemotherapy may affect future fertility is important for survivorship care.
目的:全身化疗可能因其促性腺毒性作用而损害未来生殖。有化疗史的患者接受单整倍体胚胎移植(SEET)的妊娠结局数据有限。材料和方法:本回顾性队列研究纳入2011年至2023年期间接受过化疗的患者。周期按卵母细胞年龄、SEET年龄、BMI和年份与对照组1:3匹配。采用Wilcoxon秩、卡方和校正logistic回归进行分析。进行了一项亚分析,比较使用化疗前和化疗后提取卵母细胞的SEET患者。结果:32例既往化疗患者的55个周期与165个对照周期相匹配。化疗组23个周期(41.8%)使用化疗前卵母细胞胚胎,32个周期(58.2%)使用化疗后卵母细胞胚胎。术前化疗的子宫内膜厚度明显低于对照组(分别为8mm和9mm, p = 0.02)。既往化疗患者和对照组的持续妊娠/活产率相似(56.4% vs. 57.0%, p = 0.94)。校正分析证实了结果(aOR为1.5,CI为0.79-2.8,p = 0.21)。妊娠、临床妊娠和流产率相似。亚组分析显示,化疗前与化疗后使用卵母细胞的患者的预后无统计学差异。然而,观察到化疗后使用卵母细胞的患者预后较差的趋势。结论:既往化疗患者SEET后的结果与对照组相当。化疗后卵母细胞使用成功率降低的可能趋势值得进一步调查。了解化疗可能影响未来生育能力的潜在机制对生存护理很重要。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics publishes cellular, molecular, genetic, and epigenetic discoveries advancing our understanding of the biology and underlying mechanisms from gametogenesis to offspring health. Special emphasis is placed on the practice and evolution of assisted reproduction technologies (ARTs) with reference to the diagnosis and management of diseases affecting fertility. Our goal is to educate our readership in the translation of basic and clinical discoveries made from human or relevant animal models to the safe and efficacious practice of human ARTs. The scientific rigor and ethical standards embraced by the JARG editorial team ensures a broad international base of expertise guiding the marriage of contemporary clinical research paradigms with basic science discovery. JARG publishes original papers, minireviews, case reports, and opinion pieces often combined into special topic issues that will educate clinicians and scientists with interests in the mechanisms of human development that bear on the treatment of infertility and emerging innovations in human ARTs. The guiding principles of male and female reproductive health impacting pre- and post-conceptional viability and developmental potential are emphasized within the purview of human reproductive health in current and future generations of our species.
The journal is published in cooperation with the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, an organization of more than 8,000 physicians, researchers, nurses, technicians and other professionals dedicated to advancing knowledge and expertise in reproductive biology.