Comparing American and Chinese Primary School Students' Psychosocial Symptoms: Psychometric Network Analysis With Pediatric Symptom Checklist-17.

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Ang Xia, Jin Liu, Tuo Liu, Junhao Pan, Ruyi Ding
{"title":"Comparing American and Chinese Primary School Students' Psychosocial Symptoms: Psychometric Network Analysis With Pediatric Symptom Checklist-17.","authors":"Ang Xia, Jin Liu, Tuo Liu, Junhao Pan, Ruyi Ding","doi":"10.1002/jclp.70049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to compare the American and Chinese primary school students' psychosocial problems, utilizing the psychometric network analysis. American (n = 71, M<sub>age</sub> = 36.93 years, SD = 10.52 years, all females) and Chinese (n = 74, M<sub>age</sub> = 35.70 years, SD = 7.89 years, 85.92% females) primary school teachers were recruited to evaluate children's internalizing, externalizing, and attention problems using the Pediatric Symptom Checklist-17 (PSC-17). Each teacher evaluated 9 children in their classes. A total of 639 American students (M<sub>age</sub> = 8.88 years, SD = 2.02 years, 55.56% females) and 666 Chinese students (M<sub>age</sub> = 12.88 years, SD = 9.34 years, 57.96% females) were evaluated. Psychometric network analysis revealed distinct structures for American and Chinese children's psychosocial problems. In America, three distinct communities emerged, aligning with the theoretical constructs of the PSC-17. Conversely, while three communities were identified in China, three items assessing attention problems showed strong associations with those assessing internalizing problems, merging into the same community. The remaining two items assessing attention problems and the items assessing externalizing problems formed two other distinct communities. Moreover, in both cultures, the top three nodes with the highest centralities ('Distracted easily,' 'Blame others for his or her troubles,' and 'has trouble concentrating') are similar and all relate to externalizing and attention problems. However, the highest centralized node in the two cultures differed, with \"Distracted easily\" in America and \"Blames others for his or her troubles\" in China. In conclusion, the observed patterns in American and Chinese networks highlight the significant impact of culture on children's psychosocial issues. Although PSC-17 is a widely used screening tool in many languages, its application should be carefully considered in different cultural contexts, particularly when making cultural comparisons.</p>","PeriodicalId":15395,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.70049","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the American and Chinese primary school students' psychosocial problems, utilizing the psychometric network analysis. American (n = 71, Mage = 36.93 years, SD = 10.52 years, all females) and Chinese (n = 74, Mage = 35.70 years, SD = 7.89 years, 85.92% females) primary school teachers were recruited to evaluate children's internalizing, externalizing, and attention problems using the Pediatric Symptom Checklist-17 (PSC-17). Each teacher evaluated 9 children in their classes. A total of 639 American students (Mage = 8.88 years, SD = 2.02 years, 55.56% females) and 666 Chinese students (Mage = 12.88 years, SD = 9.34 years, 57.96% females) were evaluated. Psychometric network analysis revealed distinct structures for American and Chinese children's psychosocial problems. In America, three distinct communities emerged, aligning with the theoretical constructs of the PSC-17. Conversely, while three communities were identified in China, three items assessing attention problems showed strong associations with those assessing internalizing problems, merging into the same community. The remaining two items assessing attention problems and the items assessing externalizing problems formed two other distinct communities. Moreover, in both cultures, the top three nodes with the highest centralities ('Distracted easily,' 'Blame others for his or her troubles,' and 'has trouble concentrating') are similar and all relate to externalizing and attention problems. However, the highest centralized node in the two cultures differed, with "Distracted easily" in America and "Blames others for his or her troubles" in China. In conclusion, the observed patterns in American and Chinese networks highlight the significant impact of culture on children's psychosocial issues. Although PSC-17 is a widely used screening tool in many languages, its application should be carefully considered in different cultural contexts, particularly when making cultural comparisons.

中美小学生心理社会症状比较:心理测量网络分析与儿童症状量表-17。
本研究旨在运用心理测量网络分析,比较中美两国小学生的心理社会问题。招募美国(n = 71, Mage = 36.93, SD = 10.52,均为女性)和中国(n = 74, Mage = 35.70, SD = 7.89, 85.92%为女性)小学教师,使用《儿童症状量表-17》(PSC-17)评估儿童的内化、外化和注意问题。每位老师对班上的9名学生进行了评估。共评估639名美国学生(Mage = 8.88岁,SD = 2.02岁,女性占55.56%)和666名中国学生(Mage = 12.88岁,SD = 9.34岁,女性占57.96%)。心理测量网络分析揭示了中美两国儿童社会心理问题的不同结构。在美国,三个不同的社区出现了,与PSC-17的理论结构一致。相反,虽然在中国确定了三个社区,但评估注意力问题的三个项目与评估内化问题的三个项目表现出强烈的关联,合并为同一个社区。其余两个评估注意力问题的项目和评估外化问题的项目形成了另外两个不同的社区。此外,在这两种文化中,中心性最高的前三个节点(“容易分心”、“把自己的麻烦归咎于他人”和“难以集中注意力”)是相似的,而且都与外化和注意力问题有关。然而,两种文化的最高集中节点有所不同,美国的“容易分心”和中国的“把自己的麻烦归咎于别人”。总之,在美国和中国网络中观察到的模式突出了文化对儿童心理社会问题的重大影响。尽管PSC-17是许多语言中广泛使用的筛选工具,但在不同的文化背景下,特别是在进行文化比较时,应仔细考虑其应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Journal of Clinical Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.30%
发文量
177
期刊介绍: Founded in 1945, the Journal of Clinical Psychology is a peer-reviewed forum devoted to research, assessment, and practice. Published eight times a year, the Journal includes research studies; articles on contemporary professional issues, single case research; brief reports (including dissertations in brief); notes from the field; and news and notes. In addition to papers on psychopathology, psychodiagnostics, and the psychotherapeutic process, the journal welcomes articles focusing on psychotherapy effectiveness research, psychological assessment and treatment matching, clinical outcomes, clinical health psychology, and behavioral medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信