A Digital, Self-Management Behavior Change Intervention for People With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Cohort Study.

IF 2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Liam Knox, Rachel Rahman, Gareth Norris, Carol-Anne Davies, Kimberley Littlemore, Claire Hurlin, Sam Rice, Keir Lewis
{"title":"A Digital, Self-Management Behavior Change Intervention for People With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Cohort Study.","authors":"Liam Knox, Rachel Rahman, Gareth Norris, Carol-Anne Davies, Kimberley Littlemore, Claire Hurlin, Sam Rice, Keir Lewis","doi":"10.2196/75683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) experience a range of limitations, which have a significant effect on their health. Self-management and pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) are key treatments for people with COPD; however, barriers often limit their uptake and adherence.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To overcome these barriers, a digital self-management intervention called PocketMedic (PM) was developed and evaluated in people with COPD alongside, and in addition, to PR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 53 participants were recruited to 1 of 3 groups: PM and PR, PM, or PR. Data were collected at baseline and 7 weeks (after the interventions had finished). Questionnaires on health-related quality of life, self-management knowledge, and disease knowledge were collected. Multivariate analysis of variances and ANOVAs were used to analyze the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analyses found that the improvements in those receiving PM were not statistically significantly different from those receiving PR, indicating that PM may replicate the benefits underpinning self-management behaviors observed in those attending PR. However, there were no additional benefits when participants received PM and PR in combination.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PM may be a useful treatment to support COPD self-management, especially when barriers prevent people with COPD receiving traditional services such as PR. The quantitative results suggest that PM may be less beneficial when delivered alongside PR. Feedback from participants indicated that they would prefer to receive PM while they were on the waiting list for PR, to support them during this time and alleviate the apprehensions associated with attending PR. Implications, limitations, and suggestions for future research are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"e75683"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12505406/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Formative Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/75683","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: People with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) experience a range of limitations, which have a significant effect on their health. Self-management and pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) are key treatments for people with COPD; however, barriers often limit their uptake and adherence.

Objective: To overcome these barriers, a digital self-management intervention called PocketMedic (PM) was developed and evaluated in people with COPD alongside, and in addition, to PR.

Methods: A total of 53 participants were recruited to 1 of 3 groups: PM and PR, PM, or PR. Data were collected at baseline and 7 weeks (after the interventions had finished). Questionnaires on health-related quality of life, self-management knowledge, and disease knowledge were collected. Multivariate analysis of variances and ANOVAs were used to analyze the data.

Results: The analyses found that the improvements in those receiving PM were not statistically significantly different from those receiving PR, indicating that PM may replicate the benefits underpinning self-management behaviors observed in those attending PR. However, there were no additional benefits when participants received PM and PR in combination.

Conclusions: PM may be a useful treatment to support COPD self-management, especially when barriers prevent people with COPD receiving traditional services such as PR. The quantitative results suggest that PM may be less beneficial when delivered alongside PR. Feedback from participants indicated that they would prefer to receive PM while they were on the waiting list for PR, to support them during this time and alleviate the apprehensions associated with attending PR. Implications, limitations, and suggestions for future research are discussed.

慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的数字化自我管理行为改变干预:队列研究
背景:慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者经历一系列限制,这对他们的健康有重大影响。自我管理和肺康复(PR)是COPD患者的关键治疗方法;然而,障碍往往限制了它们的吸收和坚持。为了克服这些障碍,我们开发了一种名为PocketMedic (PM)的数字自我管理干预方法,并在COPD患者中与PR一起进行了评估。方法:总共招募了53名参与者,分为PM和PR、PM或PR三组。在基线和7周(干预结束后)收集数据。收集健康相关生活质量、自我管理知识和疾病知识问卷。采用多变量方差分析和方差分析对数据进行分析。结果:分析发现,接受PM的人与接受PR的人在改善方面没有统计学上的显著差异,这表明PM可能复制了那些参加PR的人所观察到的支持自我管理行为的好处。然而,当参与者同时接受PM和PR时,没有额外的好处。结论:PM可能是支持COPD自我管理的一种有用的治疗方法,特别是当COPD患者无法接受PR等传统服务时。定量结果表明,PM与PR一起提供时可能不太有益。参与者的反馈表明,他们更愿意在PR等待名单上接受PM,以支持他们在此期间并减轻与参加PR相关的担忧。并对今后的研究提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Formative Research
JMIR Formative Research Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
579
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信