Evaluating Measurement Stability in Glioblastomas Using Magnetic Resonance Elastography: Repeatability and Interobserver Agreement.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Ancuta I Friismose, Jan S Aunan-Diop, Michael Pedersen, Rikke H Dahlrot, Frederik S G Harbo, Janni Jensen, Richard L Ehman, John Huston, Emi Hojo, Frantz R Poulsen, Ole Graumann, Bo Mussmann
{"title":"Evaluating Measurement Stability in Glioblastomas Using Magnetic Resonance Elastography: Repeatability and Interobserver Agreement.","authors":"Ancuta I Friismose, Jan S Aunan-Diop, Michael Pedersen, Rikke H Dahlrot, Frederik S G Harbo, Janni Jensen, Richard L Ehman, John Huston, Emi Hojo, Frantz R Poulsen, Ole Graumann, Bo Mussmann","doi":"10.1002/jmri.70145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) has demonstrated potential in characterizing intracranial tumors, including glioblastoma. The influence of pathology on measurement consistency and interobserver agreement needs evaluation to promote MRE implementation as a quantitative biomarker.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess repeatability and interobserver agreement of absolute and normalized magnitude of the complex shear modulus (|G*|), storage modulus (G'), and loss modulus (G″) in glioblastoma.</p><p><strong>Study type: </strong>Prospective.</p><p><strong>Population: </strong>Thirteen adults (5 male, 8 female, mean age 66.23 years) with histopathologically confirmed glioblastoma.</p><p><strong>Field strength/sequence: </strong>3 T MRI, modified single-shot spin-echo echo-planar imaging.</p><p><strong>Assessment: </strong>Two same-session MRE acquisitions were performed with patient repositioning. The solid tumor component was independently segmented by 2 observers on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images co-registered to MRE maps.</p><p><strong>Statistical tests: </strong>Repeatability was assessed using the repeatability coefficient, coefficient of variation, and Bland-Altman plots, and interobserver agreement by the intraclass correlation coefficient. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test compared parameters and coefficients of variation between tumor-normal-appearing white matter and absolute and normalized measurements. Significance was set at 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Tumor |G*| and G' showed repeatability coefficients of 0.07-0.08 kPa and 0.05 kPa, compared with 0.13 kPa (|G*|) and 0.15-0.16 kPa (G') for normalized measurements. Coefficients of variation in tumor regions were 1.42% ± 1.12%-1.60% ± 1.41% for |G*| and 1.19% ± 0.96%-2.08% ± 2.22% for G', significantly lower than normalized values (4.82% ± 4.49%-4.21% ± 4.27% for |G*|; 5.12% ± 5.04%-5.45% ± 4.53% for G'). Tumor |G*| and G' showed excellent interobserver agreement (intraclass correlation coefficients 0.97 and 0.95). Tumor G″ demonstrated higher variability than |G*| and G' (coefficients of variation 8.58% ± 7.69%-7.51% ± 6.73%), with no significant difference between absolute and normalized measurements (p = 0.14).</p><p><strong>Data conclusion: </strong>Tumor |G*| and G' are the most repeatable metrics in glioblastoma. Normalization reduces measurement repeatability due to normal-appearing white matter variability. The small sample size (n = 13) limits generalizability.</p><p><strong>Evidence level: </strong>2.</p><p><strong>Technical efficacy: </strong>Stage 2.</p>","PeriodicalId":16140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.70145","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) has demonstrated potential in characterizing intracranial tumors, including glioblastoma. The influence of pathology on measurement consistency and interobserver agreement needs evaluation to promote MRE implementation as a quantitative biomarker.

Purpose: To assess repeatability and interobserver agreement of absolute and normalized magnitude of the complex shear modulus (|G*|), storage modulus (G'), and loss modulus (G″) in glioblastoma.

Study type: Prospective.

Population: Thirteen adults (5 male, 8 female, mean age 66.23 years) with histopathologically confirmed glioblastoma.

Field strength/sequence: 3 T MRI, modified single-shot spin-echo echo-planar imaging.

Assessment: Two same-session MRE acquisitions were performed with patient repositioning. The solid tumor component was independently segmented by 2 observers on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images co-registered to MRE maps.

Statistical tests: Repeatability was assessed using the repeatability coefficient, coefficient of variation, and Bland-Altman plots, and interobserver agreement by the intraclass correlation coefficient. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test compared parameters and coefficients of variation between tumor-normal-appearing white matter and absolute and normalized measurements. Significance was set at 0.05.

Results: Tumor |G*| and G' showed repeatability coefficients of 0.07-0.08 kPa and 0.05 kPa, compared with 0.13 kPa (|G*|) and 0.15-0.16 kPa (G') for normalized measurements. Coefficients of variation in tumor regions were 1.42% ± 1.12%-1.60% ± 1.41% for |G*| and 1.19% ± 0.96%-2.08% ± 2.22% for G', significantly lower than normalized values (4.82% ± 4.49%-4.21% ± 4.27% for |G*|; 5.12% ± 5.04%-5.45% ± 4.53% for G'). Tumor |G*| and G' showed excellent interobserver agreement (intraclass correlation coefficients 0.97 and 0.95). Tumor G″ demonstrated higher variability than |G*| and G' (coefficients of variation 8.58% ± 7.69%-7.51% ± 6.73%), with no significant difference between absolute and normalized measurements (p = 0.14).

Data conclusion: Tumor |G*| and G' are the most repeatable metrics in glioblastoma. Normalization reduces measurement repeatability due to normal-appearing white matter variability. The small sample size (n = 13) limits generalizability.

Evidence level: 2.

Technical efficacy: Stage 2.

利用磁共振弹性成像评估胶质母细胞瘤的测量稳定性:可重复性和观察者间的一致性。
背景:磁共振弹性成像(MRE)在颅内肿瘤(包括胶质母细胞瘤)的表征方面已被证明具有潜力。病理对测量一致性和观察者间一致性的影响需要评估,以促进MRE作为定量生物标志物的实施。目的:评估胶质母细胞瘤中复合剪切模量(|G*|)、储存模量(G')和损失模量(G″)绝对和归一化幅度的重复性和观察者间的一致性。研究类型:前瞻性。人群:13名成人(男5名,女8名,平均年龄66.23岁),组织病理学证实为胶质母细胞瘤。场强/序列:3t MRI,改良单次自旋回波回波平面成像。评估:患者重新定位时进行了两次同期MRE采集。实体瘤部分由2个观察者在对比增强的t1加权图像上独立分割,这些图像与MRE图共同配准。统计检验:使用可重复性系数、变异系数和Bland-Altman图评估可重复性,并通过类内相关系数评估观察者间的一致性。Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较肿瘤正常白质与绝对和归一化测量值之间的参数和变异系数。显著性设为0.05。结果:肿瘤|G*|和G‘的重复性系数分别为0.07 ~ 0.08 kPa和0.05 kPa,而归一化测量的重复性系数分别为0.13 kPa (|G*|)和0.15 ~ 0.16 kPa (G’)。肿瘤区域变异系数|G*|为1.42%±1.12% ~ 1.60%±1.41%,G′为1.19%±0.96% ~ 2.08%±2.22%,显著低于归一化值(|G*|为4.82%±4.49% ~ 4.21%±4.27%,G′为5.12%±5.04% ~ 5.45%±4.53%)。肿瘤|G*|和G'具有良好的观察者间一致性(类内相关系数分别为0.97和0.95)。肿瘤G″的变异性高于|G*|和G'(变异系数为8.58%±7.69%-7.51%±6.73%),绝对值和归一化值之间无显著差异(p = 0.14)。数据结论:肿瘤|G*|和G′是胶质母细胞瘤中重复性最高的指标。由于正常的白质变异性,归一化降低了测量的可重复性。小样本量(n = 13)限制了普遍性。证据等级:2。技术功效:第二阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.80%
发文量
494
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (JMRI) is an international journal devoted to the timely publication of basic and clinical research, educational and review articles, and other information related to the diagnostic applications of magnetic resonance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信