Antimicrobial use in equine patients at a veterinary teaching hospital in the northeastern United States reveals opportunities for enhanced stewardship.

IF 1.8 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Pamela S Velarde, Kevin J Cummings, Charisse LaPointe, Gillian A Perkins
{"title":"Antimicrobial use in equine patients at a veterinary teaching hospital in the northeastern United States reveals opportunities for enhanced stewardship.","authors":"Pamela S Velarde, Kevin J Cummings, Charisse LaPointe, Gillian A Perkins","doi":"10.2460/javma.25.06.0373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the use of systemic antimicrobial agents in equine patients and identify areas where their use could be reduced.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study evaluating the electronic medical records for all equine visits in which systemic antimicrobials were given at a veterinary teaching hospital for 1 year (2021). Negative binomial regression analysis was used to evaluate factors associated with antimicrobial prescription rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Systemic antimicrobials were prescribed for 33.5% (543 of 1,622) of equine visits. For most visits (89.1%), ≤ 3 antimicrobials were given. The antimicrobial prescription rate was higher in patients with confirmed or suspected infection and in patients that died or were euthanized. Highest-priority critically important antimicrobials were used infrequently (13.6% [74 of 543]). Equine patients undergoing clean surgeries (n = 122) received antimicrobials on the day of surgery, with many receiving > 24 hours of treatment (65). Approximately 24% of nonsurgical patients received antimicrobials when there was no evidence of infection. Culture was performed infrequently (15.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Systemic antimicrobials were given during a third of the equine visits in 2021. The limited use of highest-priority critically important antimicrobials suggests that clinicians were not using these medications for first-line treatment. Areas for improvement include documenting the clinician's justification for antimicrobial use along with type, duration, and reasons for de-escalation and/or escalation of therapy; reducing perioperative use, especially for clean surgeries; and increasing the submission of samples for culture.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Antimicrobial resistance continues to be a global concern, and veterinarians can reduce the use of antimicrobials by critically evaluating their own use and modifying behaviors to align with current evidence-based recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":14658,"journal":{"name":"Javma-journal of The American Veterinary Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Javma-journal of The American Veterinary Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.25.06.0373","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the use of systemic antimicrobial agents in equine patients and identify areas where their use could be reduced.

Methods: A retrospective study evaluating the electronic medical records for all equine visits in which systemic antimicrobials were given at a veterinary teaching hospital for 1 year (2021). Negative binomial regression analysis was used to evaluate factors associated with antimicrobial prescription rate.

Results: Systemic antimicrobials were prescribed for 33.5% (543 of 1,622) of equine visits. For most visits (89.1%), ≤ 3 antimicrobials were given. The antimicrobial prescription rate was higher in patients with confirmed or suspected infection and in patients that died or were euthanized. Highest-priority critically important antimicrobials were used infrequently (13.6% [74 of 543]). Equine patients undergoing clean surgeries (n = 122) received antimicrobials on the day of surgery, with many receiving > 24 hours of treatment (65). Approximately 24% of nonsurgical patients received antimicrobials when there was no evidence of infection. Culture was performed infrequently (15.7%).

Conclusions: Systemic antimicrobials were given during a third of the equine visits in 2021. The limited use of highest-priority critically important antimicrobials suggests that clinicians were not using these medications for first-line treatment. Areas for improvement include documenting the clinician's justification for antimicrobial use along with type, duration, and reasons for de-escalation and/or escalation of therapy; reducing perioperative use, especially for clean surgeries; and increasing the submission of samples for culture.

Clinical relevance: Antimicrobial resistance continues to be a global concern, and veterinarians can reduce the use of antimicrobials by critically evaluating their own use and modifying behaviors to align with current evidence-based recommendations.

在美国东北部兽医教学医院的马病人抗菌药物的使用揭示了加强管理的机会。
目的:评估马患者使用全身抗菌药物的情况,并确定可以减少使用的领域。方法:一项回顾性研究,评估了一家兽医教学医院1年(2021年)所有接受全身抗菌素治疗的马的电子病历。采用负二项回归分析评价影响抗菌药物处方率的相关因素。结果:33.5%(1622次就诊中的543次)的马接受了全身性抗微生物药物治疗。对于大多数就诊(89.1%),给予≤3种抗菌素。确诊或疑似感染患者以及死亡或安乐死患者的抗菌药物处方率较高。最重要的抗菌素使用频率较低(13.6%[543例中的74例])。接受清洁手术的马患者(n = 122)在手术当天接受了抗菌素治疗,其中许多患者接受了24小时的治疗(65)。大约24%的非手术患者在没有感染证据的情况下接受了抗菌素治疗。很少进行培养(15.7%)。结论:2021年,三分之一的马就诊期间接受了全身抗菌素治疗。最高优先级至关重要的抗菌素的有限使用表明临床医生并未将这些药物用于一线治疗。需要改进的领域包括记录临床医生使用抗菌药物的理由,以及治疗的类型、持续时间和降级和/或升级的原因;减少围手术期用药,特别是清洁手术;并增加了样本的上交量。临床相关性:抗微生物药物耐药性仍然是全球关注的问题,兽医可以通过严格评估自身使用情况并根据当前循证建议修改行为来减少抗微生物药物的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
15.80%
发文量
539
审稿时长
6-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Published twice monthly, this peer-reviewed, general scientific journal provides reports of clinical research, feature articles and regular columns of interest to veterinarians in private and public practice. The News and Classified Ad sections are posted online 10 days to two weeks before they are delivered in print.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信