Effects of preoperative virtual simulation planning on the treatment of acetabular fractures: a meta-analysis.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Jieyu Chen, Lei Bai, Sergei V Petrenko, Chaohui Wang, Bixiu Lei, Shuangping He, Meilan Zhai, Huawu Liu, Jianhui Yan
{"title":"Effects of preoperative virtual simulation planning on the treatment of acetabular fractures: a meta-analysis.","authors":"Jieyu Chen, Lei Bai, Sergei V Petrenko, Chaohui Wang, Bixiu Lei, Shuangping He, Meilan Zhai, Huawu Liu, Jianhui Yan","doi":"10.1177/11207000251369498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the impact of preoperative virtual simulation planning on intraoperative parameters, postoperative complications, and functional recovery in acetabular fracture surgery, thereby aiding in clinical decision-making regarding the most effective approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic search of articles in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases up to July 14, 2023. All clinical studies comparing preoperative virtual simulation planning with conventional surgical treatment were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>16 studies involving 593 patients were included. Among these studies, 6 were randomised controlled trials (RCTs), 1 was a prospective study, and 9 were retrospective studies. Compared to conventional surgery, preoperative virtual simulation planning-assisted surgery significantly reduced intraoperative time (weighted mean differences [WMD] -48.87; 95% CI, -61.15--36.59; <i>p</i> < 0.001), internal fixation time (WMD -29.83; 95% CI, -37.46--22.20; <i>p</i> < 0.001), intraoperative blood loss (WMD -259.95; 95% CI, -354.15--165.75; <i>p</i> < 0.001), and fluoroscopy frequency (WMD -4.56; 95% CI, -5.39--3.73; <i>p</i> < 0.001), as well as the incidence of postoperative complications (OR 0.34; 95% CI, 0.18-0.65; <i>p</i> = 0.001). There was no significant difference in fracture reduction quality between the preoperative virtual simulation planning group and the conventional group (OR 0.98; 95% CI, 0.75-1.29; <i>p</i> = 0.900), but the former had a higher rate of anatomical reduction (OR 3.00; 95% CI, 1.90-4.72; <i>p</i> < 0.001). There was no significant difference in hip joint function scores between the 2 groups (OR 1.01; 95% CI, 0.72-1.41; <i>p</i> = 0.974). However, the preoperative virtual simulation planning group had a higher proportion of patients with excellent scores (OR 2.32; 95% CI, 1.35-3.99; <i>p</i> = 0.002) and a lower proportion of patients with poor scores (OR 0.52; 95% CI, 0.14-1.92; <i>p</i> = 0.327).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to conventional surgery, preoperative virtual simulation planning is more effective in the treatment of acetabular fractures, resulting in shorter intraoperative and internal fixation times, reduced intraoperative blood loss, and lower fluoroscopy frequency. Moreover, in the follow-up period, the preoperative virtual simulation planning group exhibits a lower incidence of postoperative complications and superior fracture site recovery, resulting in better overall prognostic outcomes.Prospero registration:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ (registration number: RD42023447807).</p>","PeriodicalId":12911,"journal":{"name":"HIP International","volume":" ","pages":"11207000251369498"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HIP International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11207000251369498","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the impact of preoperative virtual simulation planning on intraoperative parameters, postoperative complications, and functional recovery in acetabular fracture surgery, thereby aiding in clinical decision-making regarding the most effective approach.

Methods: We conducted a systematic search of articles in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases up to July 14, 2023. All clinical studies comparing preoperative virtual simulation planning with conventional surgical treatment were included.

Results: 16 studies involving 593 patients were included. Among these studies, 6 were randomised controlled trials (RCTs), 1 was a prospective study, and 9 were retrospective studies. Compared to conventional surgery, preoperative virtual simulation planning-assisted surgery significantly reduced intraoperative time (weighted mean differences [WMD] -48.87; 95% CI, -61.15--36.59; p < 0.001), internal fixation time (WMD -29.83; 95% CI, -37.46--22.20; p < 0.001), intraoperative blood loss (WMD -259.95; 95% CI, -354.15--165.75; p < 0.001), and fluoroscopy frequency (WMD -4.56; 95% CI, -5.39--3.73; p < 0.001), as well as the incidence of postoperative complications (OR 0.34; 95% CI, 0.18-0.65; p = 0.001). There was no significant difference in fracture reduction quality between the preoperative virtual simulation planning group and the conventional group (OR 0.98; 95% CI, 0.75-1.29; p = 0.900), but the former had a higher rate of anatomical reduction (OR 3.00; 95% CI, 1.90-4.72; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in hip joint function scores between the 2 groups (OR 1.01; 95% CI, 0.72-1.41; p = 0.974). However, the preoperative virtual simulation planning group had a higher proportion of patients with excellent scores (OR 2.32; 95% CI, 1.35-3.99; p = 0.002) and a lower proportion of patients with poor scores (OR 0.52; 95% CI, 0.14-1.92; p = 0.327).

Conclusions: Compared to conventional surgery, preoperative virtual simulation planning is more effective in the treatment of acetabular fractures, resulting in shorter intraoperative and internal fixation times, reduced intraoperative blood loss, and lower fluoroscopy frequency. Moreover, in the follow-up period, the preoperative virtual simulation planning group exhibits a lower incidence of postoperative complications and superior fracture site recovery, resulting in better overall prognostic outcomes.Prospero registration:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ (registration number: RD42023447807).

术前虚拟模拟计划对髋臼骨折治疗的影响:荟萃分析。
目的:探讨术前虚拟模拟计划对髋臼骨折手术中术中参数、术后并发症及功能恢复的影响,为临床决策最有效的手术方式提供依据。方法:系统检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library和Web of Science数据库中截至2023年7月14日的文章。所有比较术前虚拟模拟计划与常规手术治疗的临床研究均被纳入。结果:纳入16项研究,593例患者。其中6项为随机对照试验(RCTs), 1项为前瞻性研究,9项为回顾性研究。与常规手术相比,术前虚拟模拟计划辅助手术显著减少术中时间(加权平均差[WMD] -48.87; 95% CI, -61.15—36.59;p p p p p = 0.001)。术前虚拟模拟计划组与常规组骨折复位质量差异无统计学意义(OR 0.98; 95% CI, 0.75 ~ 1.29; p = 0.900),但前者解剖复位率更高(OR 3.00; 95% CI, 1.90 ~ 4.72; p = 0.974)。但术前虚拟模拟计划组优等评分比例较高(OR 2.32; 95% CI, 1.35-3.99; p = 0.002),差等评分比例较低(OR 0.52; 95% CI, 0.14-1.92; p = 0.327)。结论:与常规手术相比,术前虚拟模拟计划治疗髋臼骨折更有效,术中及内固定时间更短,术中出血量更少,透视次数更低。此外,在随访期间,术前虚拟模拟规划组术后并发症发生率较低,骨折部位恢复较好,整体预后较好。普洛斯彼罗注册:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/(注册号:RD42023447807)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
HIP International
HIP International 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: HIP International is the official journal of the European Hip Society. It is the only international, peer-reviewed, bi-monthly journal dedicated to diseases of the hip. HIP International considers contributions relating to hip surgery, traumatology of the hip, prosthetic surgery, biomechanics, and basic sciences relating to the hip. HIP International invites reviews from leading specialists with the aim of informing its readers of current evidence-based best practice. The journal also publishes supplements containing proceedings of symposia, special meetings or articles of special educational merit. HIP International is divided into six independent sections led by editors of the highest scientific merit. These sections are: • Biomaterials • Biomechanics • Conservative Hip Surgery • Paediatrics • Primary and Revision Hip Arthroplasty • Traumatology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信