Enhancing the BWC Through Scientific Communities and Networks of New Actors in the Era of Emerging Science and Technology.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Yuhan Bao, Kirsten A Angeles, Delfina Fernandes Hlashwayo, Ketan Thorat, Musonda Mandona, Keletso Masisi, Faizan Ahmad, Amèwouga Kassegne
{"title":"Enhancing the BWC Through Scientific Communities and Networks of New Actors in the Era of Emerging Science and Technology.","authors":"Yuhan Bao, Kirsten A Angeles, Delfina Fernandes Hlashwayo, Ketan Thorat, Musonda Mandona, Keletso Masisi, Faizan Ahmad, Amèwouga Kassegne","doi":"10.1177/23265094251387073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over the past 5 decades, the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) and the broader biosecurity agenda have evolved significantly, shaped by the widespread and rapid development of emerging science and biotechnologies. This evolving landscape demands more inclusive governance mechanisms and has driven scientific communities and networks of nonstate actors to play a crucial role in shaping biosecurity governance, thereby paving the way for a new approach for the BWC in the coming decades. In this commentary, we explore innovative approaches to strengthening global biosecurity governance by emphasizing the role of scientific communities and networks of new actors in enhancing the BWC's framework. We identify 5 key approaches for advancing biosecurity by analyzing cases we observed: (1) exploring governance strategies and providing early warning for emerging technology risks, (2) promoting biosecurity by design and responsible innovation, (3) capacity building through grassroots networks of new actors, (4) building action networks based on knowledge sharing and collaboration for rapid response to biosecurity risks, and (5) engaging in science diplomacy and bridging governance gaps. Building on the analysis of the linkages between these innovative approaches and the BWC, we seek to offer a forward-looking vision for revitalizing the BWC by incorporating efforts through a well-designed bottom-up mechanism, ensuring a more inclusive, collaborative, and proactive biosecurity governance framework in the coming decades.</p>","PeriodicalId":12955,"journal":{"name":"Health Security","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Security","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23265094251387073","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the past 5 decades, the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) and the broader biosecurity agenda have evolved significantly, shaped by the widespread and rapid development of emerging science and biotechnologies. This evolving landscape demands more inclusive governance mechanisms and has driven scientific communities and networks of nonstate actors to play a crucial role in shaping biosecurity governance, thereby paving the way for a new approach for the BWC in the coming decades. In this commentary, we explore innovative approaches to strengthening global biosecurity governance by emphasizing the role of scientific communities and networks of new actors in enhancing the BWC's framework. We identify 5 key approaches for advancing biosecurity by analyzing cases we observed: (1) exploring governance strategies and providing early warning for emerging technology risks, (2) promoting biosecurity by design and responsible innovation, (3) capacity building through grassroots networks of new actors, (4) building action networks based on knowledge sharing and collaboration for rapid response to biosecurity risks, and (5) engaging in science diplomacy and bridging governance gaps. Building on the analysis of the linkages between these innovative approaches and the BWC, we seek to offer a forward-looking vision for revitalizing the BWC by incorporating efforts through a well-designed bottom-up mechanism, ensuring a more inclusive, collaborative, and proactive biosecurity governance framework in the coming decades.

在新兴科技时代,通过科学界和新行为体网络加强《生物武器公约》。
在过去50年里,由于新兴科学和生物技术的广泛和快速发展,《生物武器公约》和更广泛的生物安全议程发生了重大变化。这种不断变化的格局需要更具包容性的治理机制,并推动科学界和非国家行为体网络在形成生物安全治理方面发挥关键作用,从而为未来几十年《生物武器公约》的新方法铺平道路。在本评论中,我们通过强调科学界和新行为体网络在加强《生物武器公约》框架方面的作用,探讨了加强全球生物安全治理的创新方法。通过分析观察到的案例,我们确定了推进生物安全的5个关键途径:(1)探索治理战略并为新兴技术风险提供预警;(2)通过设计和负责任的创新促进生物安全;(3)通过新参与者的基层网络进行能力建设;(4)建立基于知识共享和协作的行动网络,以快速应对生物安全风险;(5)参与科学外交并弥合治理差距。在分析这些创新方法与《禁止生物武器公约》之间联系的基础上,我们寻求通过一个精心设计的自下而上机制整合各方努力,为振兴《禁止生物武器公约》提供前瞻性愿景,确保在未来几十年建立一个更具包容性、协作性和主动性的生物安全治理框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Security
Health Security PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
6.10%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: Health Security is a peer-reviewed journal providing research and essential guidance for the protection of people’s health before and after epidemics or disasters and for ensuring that communities are resilient to major challenges. The Journal explores the issues posed by disease outbreaks and epidemics; natural disasters; biological, chemical, and nuclear accidents or deliberate threats; foodborne outbreaks; and other health emergencies. It offers important insight into how to develop the systems needed to meet these challenges. Taking an interdisciplinary approach, Health Security covers research, innovations, methods, challenges, and ethical and legal dilemmas facing scientific, military, and health organizations. The Journal is a key resource for practitioners in these fields, policymakers, scientific experts, and government officials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信