Prediction of the impact of anxiety on atrial fibrillation recurrence after radiofrequency catheter ablation based on heart rate variability.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Frontiers in Surgery Pub Date : 2025-09-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2025.1653123
Yufei Ren, Hua Zhang, Yingji Tian
{"title":"Prediction of the impact of anxiety on atrial fibrillation recurrence after radiofrequency catheter ablation based on heart rate variability.","authors":"Yufei Ren, Hua Zhang, Yingji Tian","doi":"10.3389/fsurg.2025.1653123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) can significantly improve the prognosis of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF); however, the postoperative recurrence rate remains high. Therefore, identifying accurate predictors of recurrence after RFCA holds important clinical value.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 180 patients with AF who underwent RFCA. Patients were grouped by one-year recurrence status. Univariate analysis was conducted to compare demographic and clinical characteristics between the two groups. Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to assess the impact of heart rate variability (HRV), anxiety, and their interaction on recurrence. Predictive performance was evaluated with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Stratified analyses were performed to explore whether the effect of anxiety on recurrence varied by HRV levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the non-recurrence group, the recurrence group had higher prevalence of persistent AF and heart failure, longer AF duration, and more severe left atrial structural burden (i.e., higher EFT, LAD, and LAVI values). Multivariate Cox analysis identified that both HRV and anxiety were independent risk factors for recurrence, and their interaction term also had significant predictive value (HR > 1, <i>P</i> < 0.05). Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that patients with low HRV and high anxiety had the lowest recurrence-free survival rate. ROC curve analysis revealed that the combined HRV-anxiety interaction model yielded an AUC of 0.745, indicating a certain predictive advantage over individual indicators. Stratified analysis further confirmed that the recurrence risk associated with high anxiety was more pronounced in the low HRV group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HRV and anxiety were identified as independent predictors of AF recurrence following RFCA, with a significant synergistic interaction observed between the two. Their combined assessment may enhance the accuracy of recurrence risk prediction and provide a foundation for the development of individualized intervention strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12564,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Surgery","volume":"12 ","pages":"1653123"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12500613/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2025.1653123","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) can significantly improve the prognosis of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF); however, the postoperative recurrence rate remains high. Therefore, identifying accurate predictors of recurrence after RFCA holds important clinical value.

Methods: This retrospective study included 180 patients with AF who underwent RFCA. Patients were grouped by one-year recurrence status. Univariate analysis was conducted to compare demographic and clinical characteristics between the two groups. Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to assess the impact of heart rate variability (HRV), anxiety, and their interaction on recurrence. Predictive performance was evaluated with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Stratified analyses were performed to explore whether the effect of anxiety on recurrence varied by HRV levels.

Results: Compared with the non-recurrence group, the recurrence group had higher prevalence of persistent AF and heart failure, longer AF duration, and more severe left atrial structural burden (i.e., higher EFT, LAD, and LAVI values). Multivariate Cox analysis identified that both HRV and anxiety were independent risk factors for recurrence, and their interaction term also had significant predictive value (HR > 1, P < 0.05). Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that patients with low HRV and high anxiety had the lowest recurrence-free survival rate. ROC curve analysis revealed that the combined HRV-anxiety interaction model yielded an AUC of 0.745, indicating a certain predictive advantage over individual indicators. Stratified analysis further confirmed that the recurrence risk associated with high anxiety was more pronounced in the low HRV group.

Conclusion: HRV and anxiety were identified as independent predictors of AF recurrence following RFCA, with a significant synergistic interaction observed between the two. Their combined assessment may enhance the accuracy of recurrence risk prediction and provide a foundation for the development of individualized intervention strategies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于心率变异性预测焦虑对射频导管消融后房颤复发的影响。
背景:射频导管消融(RFCA)可显著改善心房颤动(AF)患者的预后;然而,术后复发率仍然很高。因此,确定RFCA术后复发的准确预测因子具有重要的临床价值。方法:本回顾性研究包括180例房颤患者行射频置换术。患者按一年复发情况分组。采用单因素分析比较两组患者的人口学和临床特征。采用Cox比例风险模型和Kaplan-Meier生存曲线来评估心率变异性(HRV)、焦虑及其相互作用对复发的影响。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评价预测效果。进行分层分析以探讨焦虑对复发的影响是否因HRV水平而异。结果:与未复发组相比,复发组持续性房颤和心力衰竭发生率更高,房颤持续时间更长,左房结构负担更重(即EFT、LAD、LAVI值更高)。多因素Cox分析发现,HRV和焦虑均为房颤复发的独立危险因素,其相互作用项也具有显著的预测价值(HR bbbb1, P)。结论:HRV和焦虑可作为RFCA术后房颤复发的独立预测因素,两者之间存在显著的协同作用。它们的综合评估可提高复发风险预测的准确性,并为制定个性化的干预策略提供基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Surgery
Frontiers in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
1872
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Evidence of surgical interventions go back to prehistoric times. Since then, the field of surgery has developed into a complex array of specialties and procedures, particularly with the advent of microsurgery, lasers and minimally invasive techniques. The advanced skills now required from surgeons has led to ever increasing specialization, though these still share important fundamental principles. Frontiers in Surgery is the umbrella journal representing the publication interests of all surgical specialties. It is divided into several “Specialty Sections” listed below. All these sections have their own Specialty Chief Editor, Editorial Board and homepage, but all articles carry the citation Frontiers in Surgery. Frontiers in Surgery calls upon medical professionals and scientists from all surgical specialties to publish their experimental and clinical studies in this journal. By assembling all surgical specialties, which nonetheless retain their independence, under the common umbrella of Frontiers in Surgery, a powerful publication venue is created. Since there is often overlap and common ground between the different surgical specialties, assembly of all surgical disciplines into a single journal will foster a collaborative dialogue amongst the surgical community. This means that publications, which are also of interest to other surgical specialties, will reach a wider audience and have greater impact. The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to create a discussion and knowledge platform of advances and research findings in surgical practice today to continuously improve clinical management of patients and foster innovation in this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信