Conservative treatment of finger and metacarpal fractures: a narrative review.

Q3 Medicine
Andrzej Żyluk
{"title":"Conservative treatment of finger and metacarpal fractures: a narrative review.","authors":"Andrzej Żyluk","doi":"10.24425/fmc.2025.156114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hand (finger and metacarpal) fractures are common in surgical practice, usually affecting adolescents and young adults. Treatment of these injuries is generally conservative, with generally good results. However, since the end of the 20th century, as a result of the offensive of manufacturers of implants, surgical treatment have attracted increasing popularity, although there was no scientific basis for it. Objective of this study was literature review focused on outcomes of conservative treatment of hand (metacarpal and phalangeal) fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Articles from PubMed and Medline databases on the methods and outcomes of conservative treatment of hand fractures published in last 10 years were reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 10 studies meeting inclusion criteria were identified. Three were focused on finger fractures, two - on metacarpal shaft fractures and five - on the fifth metacarpal neck fractures. Results of this review have demonstrated that vast majority of finger and metacarpal fractures can be successfully treated conservatively. Conservative treatment is preferably performed with a buddy taping or a splint allowing free mobilization of fingers. Treatment without any immobilization, according to special protocol is also an acceptable and safe option.</p>","PeriodicalId":12106,"journal":{"name":"Folia medica Cracoviensia","volume":"65 1","pages":"107-119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Folia medica Cracoviensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24425/fmc.2025.156114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hand (finger and metacarpal) fractures are common in surgical practice, usually affecting adolescents and young adults. Treatment of these injuries is generally conservative, with generally good results. However, since the end of the 20th century, as a result of the offensive of manufacturers of implants, surgical treatment have attracted increasing popularity, although there was no scientific basis for it. Objective of this study was literature review focused on outcomes of conservative treatment of hand (metacarpal and phalangeal) fractures.

Methods: Articles from PubMed and Medline databases on the methods and outcomes of conservative treatment of hand fractures published in last 10 years were reviewed.

Results: A total of 10 studies meeting inclusion criteria were identified. Three were focused on finger fractures, two - on metacarpal shaft fractures and five - on the fifth metacarpal neck fractures. Results of this review have demonstrated that vast majority of finger and metacarpal fractures can be successfully treated conservatively. Conservative treatment is preferably performed with a buddy taping or a splint allowing free mobilization of fingers. Treatment without any immobilization, according to special protocol is also an acceptable and safe option.

手指和掌骨骨折的保守治疗:叙述回顾。
背景:手部(手指和掌骨)骨折在外科实践中很常见,通常影响青少年和年轻人。这些损伤的治疗通常是保守的,通常效果很好。然而,自20世纪末以来,由于植入物制造商的攻势,手术治疗吸引了越来越多的人,尽管没有科学依据。本研究的目的是对保守治疗手部(掌骨和指骨)骨折的结果进行文献回顾。方法:回顾PubMed和Medline数据库近10年来发表的关于手部骨折保守治疗方法和结果的文章。结果:共纳入10项符合纳入标准的研究。3例集中在手指骨折,2例集中在掌骨轴骨折,5例集中在掌骨颈骨折。本综述的结果表明,绝大多数手指和掌骨骨折可以成功地保守治疗。保守治疗最好使用伙伴胶布或夹板,允许手指自由活动。根据特殊方案,不进行任何固定治疗也是一种可接受和安全的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Folia medica Cracoviensia
Folia medica Cracoviensia Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信