Narges Moein, Cindy Nguyen, Douglas Cheyne, Luc De Nil
{"title":"The Effects of tDCS on Speech Fluency in People Who Stutter: A Narrative Review","authors":"Narges Moein, Cindy Nguyen, Douglas Cheyne, Luc De Nil","doi":"10.1111/ejn.70267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To improve the outcomes of current treatments for stuttering, researchers have explored adjunct tools such as transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS). The purpose of this paper is to review the literature investigating the effectiveness of tDCS for people who stutter (PWS) and offer some directions for future research. To achieve the objective of this study, we conducted a narrative review of the existing literature. Articles were selected using these inclusion criteria: participants, tDCS protocol, control group and primary outcomes. Our literature search was limited to studies published in English with no limits on the publication year. We only extracted data from studies that investigated the effects of tDCS on PWS. Systematic reviews, meta-analyses and other forms of reviews regarding tDCS were not included. We identified 101 studies during the exploratory phase. Ultimately, seven studies met our inclusion criteria. Of the included papers, five studies reported mixed effects, one study showed no effect and one study showed positive effects of tDCS. We summarized the studies in terms of several methodological features and the observed effects from tDCS. We also used SimNIBS modelling to compare the effects of different stimulation parameters on brain activity and outcomes. The studies reviewed in this study have reported a variable effectiveness of tDCS for enhancing speech fluency in PWS. As a result, it remains unclear whether tDCS is an effective tool for stuttering intervention, and the optimal stimulation parameters are not yet established. Several suggestions for future research are offered.</p>","PeriodicalId":11993,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Neuroscience","volume":"62 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejn.70267","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejn.70267","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To improve the outcomes of current treatments for stuttering, researchers have explored adjunct tools such as transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS). The purpose of this paper is to review the literature investigating the effectiveness of tDCS for people who stutter (PWS) and offer some directions for future research. To achieve the objective of this study, we conducted a narrative review of the existing literature. Articles were selected using these inclusion criteria: participants, tDCS protocol, control group and primary outcomes. Our literature search was limited to studies published in English with no limits on the publication year. We only extracted data from studies that investigated the effects of tDCS on PWS. Systematic reviews, meta-analyses and other forms of reviews regarding tDCS were not included. We identified 101 studies during the exploratory phase. Ultimately, seven studies met our inclusion criteria. Of the included papers, five studies reported mixed effects, one study showed no effect and one study showed positive effects of tDCS. We summarized the studies in terms of several methodological features and the observed effects from tDCS. We also used SimNIBS modelling to compare the effects of different stimulation parameters on brain activity and outcomes. The studies reviewed in this study have reported a variable effectiveness of tDCS for enhancing speech fluency in PWS. As a result, it remains unclear whether tDCS is an effective tool for stuttering intervention, and the optimal stimulation parameters are not yet established. Several suggestions for future research are offered.
期刊介绍:
EJN is the journal of FENS and supports the international neuroscientific community by publishing original high quality research articles and reviews in all fields of neuroscience. In addition, to engage with issues that are of interest to the science community, we also publish Editorials, Meetings Reports and Neuro-Opinions on topics that are of current interest in the fields of neuroscience research and training in science. We have recently established a series of ‘Profiles of Women in Neuroscience’. Our goal is to provide a vehicle for publications that further the understanding of the structure and function of the nervous system in both health and disease and to provide a vehicle to engage the neuroscience community. As the official journal of FENS, profits from the journal are re-invested in the neuroscientific community through the activities of FENS.