The Effects of tDCS on Speech Fluency in People Who Stutter: A Narrative Review

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Narges Moein, Cindy Nguyen, Douglas Cheyne, Luc De Nil
{"title":"The Effects of tDCS on Speech Fluency in People Who Stutter: A Narrative Review","authors":"Narges Moein,&nbsp;Cindy Nguyen,&nbsp;Douglas Cheyne,&nbsp;Luc De Nil","doi":"10.1111/ejn.70267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To improve the outcomes of current treatments for stuttering, researchers have explored adjunct tools such as transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS). The purpose of this paper is to review the literature investigating the effectiveness of tDCS for people who stutter (PWS) and offer some directions for future research. To achieve the objective of this study, we conducted a narrative review of the existing literature. Articles were selected using these inclusion criteria: participants, tDCS protocol, control group and primary outcomes. Our literature search was limited to studies published in English with no limits on the publication year. We only extracted data from studies that investigated the effects of tDCS on PWS. Systematic reviews, meta-analyses and other forms of reviews regarding tDCS were not included. We identified 101 studies during the exploratory phase. Ultimately, seven studies met our inclusion criteria. Of the included papers, five studies reported mixed effects, one study showed no effect and one study showed positive effects of tDCS. We summarized the studies in terms of several methodological features and the observed effects from tDCS. We also used SimNIBS modelling to compare the effects of different stimulation parameters on brain activity and outcomes. The studies reviewed in this study have reported a variable effectiveness of tDCS for enhancing speech fluency in PWS. As a result, it remains unclear whether tDCS is an effective tool for stuttering intervention, and the optimal stimulation parameters are not yet established. Several suggestions for future research are offered.</p>","PeriodicalId":11993,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Neuroscience","volume":"62 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejn.70267","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejn.70267","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To improve the outcomes of current treatments for stuttering, researchers have explored adjunct tools such as transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS). The purpose of this paper is to review the literature investigating the effectiveness of tDCS for people who stutter (PWS) and offer some directions for future research. To achieve the objective of this study, we conducted a narrative review of the existing literature. Articles were selected using these inclusion criteria: participants, tDCS protocol, control group and primary outcomes. Our literature search was limited to studies published in English with no limits on the publication year. We only extracted data from studies that investigated the effects of tDCS on PWS. Systematic reviews, meta-analyses and other forms of reviews regarding tDCS were not included. We identified 101 studies during the exploratory phase. Ultimately, seven studies met our inclusion criteria. Of the included papers, five studies reported mixed effects, one study showed no effect and one study showed positive effects of tDCS. We summarized the studies in terms of several methodological features and the observed effects from tDCS. We also used SimNIBS modelling to compare the effects of different stimulation parameters on brain activity and outcomes. The studies reviewed in this study have reported a variable effectiveness of tDCS for enhancing speech fluency in PWS. As a result, it remains unclear whether tDCS is an effective tool for stuttering intervention, and the optimal stimulation parameters are not yet established. Several suggestions for future research are offered.

Abstract Image

tDCS对口吃者言语流畅性的影响:一个叙述性的回顾。
为了改善目前治疗口吃的效果,研究人员探索了辅助工具,如经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)。本文的目的是回顾研究tDCS对口吃者(PWS)有效性的文献,并为今后的研究提供一些方向。为了达到本研究的目的,我们对现有文献进行了叙述性回顾。文章采用以下入选标准:受试者、tDCS方案、对照组和主要结局。我们的文献检索仅限于用英语发表的研究,没有出版年份的限制。我们只从研究tDCS对PWS的影响的研究中提取数据。关于tDCS的系统评价、荟萃分析和其他形式的评价不包括在内。我们在探索阶段确定了101项研究。最终,有7项研究符合我们的纳入标准。在纳入的论文中,五项研究报告了混合效果,一项研究显示没有效果,一项研究显示tDCS有积极作用。我们从几个方法学特征和观察到的tDCS效果方面总结了这些研究。我们还使用SimNIBS模型来比较不同刺激参数对大脑活动和结果的影响。本研究回顾的研究报告了tDCS在提高PWS患者语言流畅性方面的不同效果。因此,tDCS是否是一种有效的口吃干预工具尚不清楚,最佳刺激参数尚未确定。对今后的研究提出了几点建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Neuroscience
European Journal of Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
305
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: EJN is the journal of FENS and supports the international neuroscientific community by publishing original high quality research articles and reviews in all fields of neuroscience. In addition, to engage with issues that are of interest to the science community, we also publish Editorials, Meetings Reports and Neuro-Opinions on topics that are of current interest in the fields of neuroscience research and training in science. We have recently established a series of ‘Profiles of Women in Neuroscience’. Our goal is to provide a vehicle for publications that further the understanding of the structure and function of the nervous system in both health and disease and to provide a vehicle to engage the neuroscience community. As the official journal of FENS, profits from the journal are re-invested in the neuroscientific community through the activities of FENS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信