Meredith M Hoog, Carlos Vallarino, Juan M Maldonado, Michael Grabner, Chia-Chen Teng, Kendra Terrell, Emma L Richard
{"title":"Real-World Effectiveness of Tirzepatide versus Semaglutide on HbA1c and Weight in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.","authors":"Meredith M Hoog, Carlos Vallarino, Juan M Maldonado, Michael Grabner, Chia-Chen Teng, Kendra Terrell, Emma L Richard","doi":"10.1007/s13300-025-01794-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To evaluate real-world hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and weight change in adults initiating treatment with tirzepatide (dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist [GLP-1 RA]) or injectable semaglutide (GLP-1 RA) indicated for type 2 diabetes (T2D) management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis utilized the Healthcare Integrated Research Database® to identify adults with T2D starting tirzepatide or injectable semaglutide between May 13, 2022 and May 29, 2023. GLP-1 RA naïve and non-naïve cohorts were identified based on the history of GLP-1 RA use within ≤ 6 months of initiation. Propensity score matching balanced 6-month baseline characteristics between groups. HbA1c and weight changes were assessed from initiation to 12 months for matched patients with HbA1c and weight data at both time points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both matched naïve cohorts were comprised of 10,702 patients (tirzepatide: 1399 with HbA1c data and 454 with weight data; semaglutide: 1173 with HbA1c data and 432 with weight data). Mean baseline HbA1c and weight were 7.8% and 112.4 kg, respectively, for the tirzepatide group and 7.8% and 110.7 kg for the semaglutide group. Both matched non-naïve cohorts were comprised of 5577 patients (tirzepatide: 792 with HbA1c data and 296 with weight data; semaglutide: 738 with HbA1c data and 224 with weight data). Mean baseline HbA1c and weight were 7.7% and 112.5 kg for tirzepatide, and 7.9% and 108.5 kg for semaglutide. Tirzepatide was associated with greater mean reductions in HbA1c (naïve: - 1.3% vs. - 0.9%; non-naïve: - 0.9% vs. - 0.6%; p < 0.001) and weight (naïve: - 10.2 kg vs. - 6.1 kg; non-naïve: - 7.9 kg vs. - 3.7 kg; p < 0.001) than semaglutide.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with T2D starting tirzepatide had greater HbA1c and weight reductions at 12 months post-initiation than those on injectable semaglutide, regardless of previous GLP-1 RA use, consistent with previous clinical trial results.</p>","PeriodicalId":11192,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-025-01794-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: To evaluate real-world hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and weight change in adults initiating treatment with tirzepatide (dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist [GLP-1 RA]) or injectable semaglutide (GLP-1 RA) indicated for type 2 diabetes (T2D) management.
Methods: This retrospective analysis utilized the Healthcare Integrated Research Database® to identify adults with T2D starting tirzepatide or injectable semaglutide between May 13, 2022 and May 29, 2023. GLP-1 RA naïve and non-naïve cohorts were identified based on the history of GLP-1 RA use within ≤ 6 months of initiation. Propensity score matching balanced 6-month baseline characteristics between groups. HbA1c and weight changes were assessed from initiation to 12 months for matched patients with HbA1c and weight data at both time points.
Results: Both matched naïve cohorts were comprised of 10,702 patients (tirzepatide: 1399 with HbA1c data and 454 with weight data; semaglutide: 1173 with HbA1c data and 432 with weight data). Mean baseline HbA1c and weight were 7.8% and 112.4 kg, respectively, for the tirzepatide group and 7.8% and 110.7 kg for the semaglutide group. Both matched non-naïve cohorts were comprised of 5577 patients (tirzepatide: 792 with HbA1c data and 296 with weight data; semaglutide: 738 with HbA1c data and 224 with weight data). Mean baseline HbA1c and weight were 7.7% and 112.5 kg for tirzepatide, and 7.9% and 108.5 kg for semaglutide. Tirzepatide was associated with greater mean reductions in HbA1c (naïve: - 1.3% vs. - 0.9%; non-naïve: - 0.9% vs. - 0.6%; p < 0.001) and weight (naïve: - 10.2 kg vs. - 6.1 kg; non-naïve: - 7.9 kg vs. - 3.7 kg; p < 0.001) than semaglutide.
Conclusions: Patients with T2D starting tirzepatide had greater HbA1c and weight reductions at 12 months post-initiation than those on injectable semaglutide, regardless of previous GLP-1 RA use, consistent with previous clinical trial results.
期刊介绍：
Diabetes Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all areas of diabetes. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged.
The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Diabetes Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
