Double Plastic Stents as a Bridging Strategy for Large Common Bile Duct Stones: A Case Report of Two Patients.

IF 0.7 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Case Reports in Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2025-09-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000548211
Anupam Kumar Gupta
{"title":"Double Plastic Stents as a Bridging Strategy for Large Common Bile Duct Stones: A Case Report of Two Patients.","authors":"Anupam Kumar Gupta","doi":"10.1159/000548211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with sphincterotomy is the standard treatment for common bile duct (CBD) stones. However, in 10-15% of cases involving large or multiple stones, this approach is inadequate. Advanced techniques such as lithotripsy, dilation, balloon extraction, or surgery may be required.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>We present 2 post-cholecystectomy patients with large (>1.5 cm), multiple impacted CBD stones. Initial ERCP attempts, including sphincterotomy and 15-mm balloon dilation, failed to clear the stones. As a bridging strategy, two plastic stents (10 Fr and 7 Fr) were placed, and ursodeoxycholic acid therapy was started. On re-evaluation at 50 and 80 days, stone clearance was achieved using simple balloon extraction - without lithotripsy or cholangioscopy - using the same tools as the initial ERCP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Double plastic stent placement can serve as an effective interim measure for complex CBD stones, facilitating complete clearance in subsequent ERCP with standard equipment.</p>","PeriodicalId":9614,"journal":{"name":"Case Reports in Gastroenterology","volume":"19 1","pages":"670-674"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12503782/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Reports in Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000548211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with sphincterotomy is the standard treatment for common bile duct (CBD) stones. However, in 10-15% of cases involving large or multiple stones, this approach is inadequate. Advanced techniques such as lithotripsy, dilation, balloon extraction, or surgery may be required.

Case presentation: We present 2 post-cholecystectomy patients with large (>1.5 cm), multiple impacted CBD stones. Initial ERCP attempts, including sphincterotomy and 15-mm balloon dilation, failed to clear the stones. As a bridging strategy, two plastic stents (10 Fr and 7 Fr) were placed, and ursodeoxycholic acid therapy was started. On re-evaluation at 50 and 80 days, stone clearance was achieved using simple balloon extraction - without lithotripsy or cholangioscopy - using the same tools as the initial ERCP.

Conclusion: Double plastic stent placement can serve as an effective interim measure for complex CBD stones, facilitating complete clearance in subsequent ERCP with standard equipment.

Abstract Image

双塑料支架治疗胆总管结石2例报告
内镜逆行胆管造影(ERCP)联合括约肌切开术是胆总管结石的标准治疗方法。然而,在10-15%的大或多发结石病例中,这种方法是不充分的。可能需要先进的技术,如碎石术、扩张术、球囊取出术或手术。病例介绍:我们报告了2例胆囊切除术后的大(>1.5 cm),多发性影响的CBD结石。最初的ERCP尝试,包括括约肌切开术和15mm球囊扩张术,未能清除结石。作为桥接策略,放置两个塑料支架(10fr和7fr),并开始熊去氧胆酸治疗。在第50天和第80天重新评估时,使用与最初ERCP相同的工具,使用简单的球囊取出术(不需要碎石或胆道镜检查)清除结石。结论:双塑料支架置入术可作为复杂CBD结石的有效过渡措施,便于后续ERCP使用标准器械完全清除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Case Reports in Gastroenterology
Case Reports in Gastroenterology Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书