Advanced Minimal Residual Disease Detection Using a Novel Circulating Tumor DNA Assay: A Report of Two Cases.

IF 0.7 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Case Reports in Oncology Pub Date : 2025-07-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000547249
Georges Azzi, Thomas P Slavin, Jesus Izaguirre-Carbonell, Hillary S Sloane, Daniel L Edelstein, Cynthia X Ma
{"title":"Advanced Minimal Residual Disease Detection Using a Novel Circulating Tumor DNA Assay: A Report of Two Cases.","authors":"Georges Azzi, Thomas P Slavin, Jesus Izaguirre-Carbonell, Hillary S Sloane, Daniel L Edelstein, Cynthia X Ma","doi":"10.1159/000547249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Tumor-informed minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring assays based on plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) are increasingly integrated into the clinical management of patients with cancer. In the post-surgical curative intent setting and as an adjunct to radiographic imaging for response assessment and surveillance, timely identification of MRD may better guide therapeutic decision-making. The increasing clinical adoption of MRD testing, supported by a growing body of evidence demonstrating its potential utility at critical decision points across diverse tumor histology, has brought attention to the variability in the analytical performance of available ctDNA assays. This variability is becoming increasingly appreciated as a key factor influencing clinical performance.</p><p><strong>Case presentations: </strong>Here we report a case series in breast and rectal cancer involving treatment monitoring with a novel advanced MRD assay, illustrating its ability to identify subclinical metastasis and disease resolution below the validated limit of detection of a commercially available ctDNA assay in these cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results aided medical decision-making and underscored the need for highly sensitive assays in MRD detection. The differences in sensitivity, driven primarily by analytical variables, highlight the importance of selecting an assay that is not only analytically robust but also appropriately matched to the patient's specific clinical context, to help ensure optimal utility and minimize the risk of misinterpretation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9625,"journal":{"name":"Case Reports in Oncology","volume":"18 1","pages":"1105-1110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12503468/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Reports in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000547249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Tumor-informed minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring assays based on plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) are increasingly integrated into the clinical management of patients with cancer. In the post-surgical curative intent setting and as an adjunct to radiographic imaging for response assessment and surveillance, timely identification of MRD may better guide therapeutic decision-making. The increasing clinical adoption of MRD testing, supported by a growing body of evidence demonstrating its potential utility at critical decision points across diverse tumor histology, has brought attention to the variability in the analytical performance of available ctDNA assays. This variability is becoming increasingly appreciated as a key factor influencing clinical performance.

Case presentations: Here we report a case series in breast and rectal cancer involving treatment monitoring with a novel advanced MRD assay, illustrating its ability to identify subclinical metastasis and disease resolution below the validated limit of detection of a commercially available ctDNA assay in these cases.

Conclusion: Results aided medical decision-making and underscored the need for highly sensitive assays in MRD detection. The differences in sensitivity, driven primarily by analytical variables, highlight the importance of selecting an assay that is not only analytically robust but also appropriately matched to the patient's specific clinical context, to help ensure optimal utility and minimize the risk of misinterpretation.

利用一种新型循环肿瘤DNA检测技术检测微小残留疾病:附两例报告。
基于血浆循环肿瘤DNA (ctDNA)的肿瘤最小残留病(MRD)监测分析越来越多地融入癌症患者的临床管理中。在术后治疗意图设置和辅助放射成像的反应评估和监测,及时识别MRD可以更好地指导治疗决策。越来越多的证据表明,MRD检测在不同肿瘤组织学的关键决策点上具有潜在的实用性,因此越来越多的临床采用MRD检测,这引起了人们对现有ctDNA检测分析性能的可变性的关注。这种可变性越来越被认为是影响临床表现的关键因素。病例介绍:在这里,我们报告了一个乳腺癌和直肠癌的病例系列,涉及使用一种新型的先进MRD检测方法进行治疗监测,说明了它在这些病例中识别亚临床转移和疾病消退的能力,低于市售ctDNA检测方法的有效检测极限。结论:结果有助于医疗决策,并强调了在MRD检测中需要高灵敏度的检测方法。灵敏度的差异主要是由分析变量驱动的,这突出了选择一种不仅在分析上可靠,而且与患者特定临床情况适当匹配的检测方法的重要性,以帮助确保最佳效用并最大限度地减少误解的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
151
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信