Sedation applications in pedodontics procedures: which one should we choose?: a retrospective analysis.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Fatih Oluş, Hüseyin Babun
{"title":"Sedation applications in pedodontics procedures: which one should we choose?: a retrospective analysis.","authors":"Fatih Oluş, Hüseyin Babun","doi":"10.1186/s12903-025-06871-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of sedation in the field of pediatric dentistry is becoming increasingly prevalent. While general anesthesia is perceived as a safer alternative, the appropriate use of sedatives, in conjunction with a well-trained team, can effectively mitigate the risks associated with sedation. Our study aims to identify safe drug combinations for prolonged sedation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted in the Operating Room of the Faculty of Dentistry at Akdeniz University. It encompassed 126 patients, classified as ASA 1-2, aged between 3 and 12 years, who underwent dental treatment with sedation support in the Department of Pedodontics from May to December 2022. The patients were categorized into three groups: (1) Ketamine, (2) Propofol-Ketamine (PK), and (3) Dexmedetomidine-Ketamine (DK). During the procedures, vital signs, the requirement for additional doses, complications, and interventions were meticulously documented. Additionally, the Ramsay Sedation Score (RSS), dentist satisfaction during the procedure, recovery time, and Aldrete scores for the postoperative 1st and 2nd hours were also recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of age, gender, mean weight, and ASA. The minimum requirement for additional doses was recorded in the DK group. Respiratory depression, apnea, hypoxia, and related maneuvers were most frequently observed in the PK group. DK group had minimum requirement for airway suction event. Hypertension and tachycardia were most frequently observed in the K group, while hypotension and bradycardia were most frequently recorded in the DK group. PONV were most common in the K group in which high ketamine doses were administered. RSS was highest in the DK group. The longest recovery times were observed in the DK group. 1st hour Aldrete scores were lower in the DK group. Dentists reached the highest level of satisfaction in the DK group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This retrospective study provides comparative insights into three sedation regimens for pediatric dental procedures. The dexmedetomidine-ketamine combination demonstrated superior intraoperative stability and fewer respiratory complications, though recovery was prolonged. These findings may guide clinicians in selecting appropriate sedation strategies to improve safety and procedural outcomes in cases involving shared airway management.</p>","PeriodicalId":9072,"journal":{"name":"BMC Oral Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"1559"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12505555/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06871-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The use of sedation in the field of pediatric dentistry is becoming increasingly prevalent. While general anesthesia is perceived as a safer alternative, the appropriate use of sedatives, in conjunction with a well-trained team, can effectively mitigate the risks associated with sedation. Our study aims to identify safe drug combinations for prolonged sedation.

Methods: This study was conducted in the Operating Room of the Faculty of Dentistry at Akdeniz University. It encompassed 126 patients, classified as ASA 1-2, aged between 3 and 12 years, who underwent dental treatment with sedation support in the Department of Pedodontics from May to December 2022. The patients were categorized into three groups: (1) Ketamine, (2) Propofol-Ketamine (PK), and (3) Dexmedetomidine-Ketamine (DK). During the procedures, vital signs, the requirement for additional doses, complications, and interventions were meticulously documented. Additionally, the Ramsay Sedation Score (RSS), dentist satisfaction during the procedure, recovery time, and Aldrete scores for the postoperative 1st and 2nd hours were also recorded.

Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of age, gender, mean weight, and ASA. The minimum requirement for additional doses was recorded in the DK group. Respiratory depression, apnea, hypoxia, and related maneuvers were most frequently observed in the PK group. DK group had minimum requirement for airway suction event. Hypertension and tachycardia were most frequently observed in the K group, while hypotension and bradycardia were most frequently recorded in the DK group. PONV were most common in the K group in which high ketamine doses were administered. RSS was highest in the DK group. The longest recovery times were observed in the DK group. 1st hour Aldrete scores were lower in the DK group. Dentists reached the highest level of satisfaction in the DK group.

Conclusions: This retrospective study provides comparative insights into three sedation regimens for pediatric dental procedures. The dexmedetomidine-ketamine combination demonstrated superior intraoperative stability and fewer respiratory complications, though recovery was prolonged. These findings may guide clinicians in selecting appropriate sedation strategies to improve safety and procedural outcomes in cases involving shared airway management.

镇静在儿科手术中的应用:我们应该选择哪一种?回顾性分析。
背景:镇静在儿科牙科领域的应用越来越普遍。虽然全身麻醉被认为是一种更安全的选择,但适当使用镇静剂,并与训练有素的团队一起,可以有效地减轻与镇静相关的风险。我们的研究旨在确定长期镇静的安全药物组合。方法:本研究在阿克德尼兹大学牙科学院手术室进行。该研究包括126例患者,分类为ASA 1-2,年龄在3至12岁之间,于2022年5月至12月在儿科接受镇静支持的牙科治疗。患者分为三组:(1)氯胺酮,(2)异丙酚氯胺酮(PK),(3)右美托咪定氯胺酮(DK)。在治疗过程中,生命体征、额外剂量、并发症和干预措施都被仔细记录下来。同时记录两组患者术后1、2小时的Ramsay镇静评分(RSS)、手术过程中牙医满意度、恢复时间及Aldrete评分。结果:两组患者年龄、性别、平均体重、ASA差异无统计学意义。DK组记录了最低额外剂量需求。呼吸抑制、呼吸暂停、缺氧及相关动作在PK组最常见。DK组对气道吸引事件的要求最低。K组以高血压、心动过速多见,DK组以低血压、心动过缓多见。在给予高剂量氯胺酮的K组中,PONV最常见。以DK组为最高。DK组恢复时间最长。DK组1小时Aldrete评分较低。牙医在DK组中达到了最高的满意度。结论:这项回顾性研究提供了三种镇静方案在儿童牙科手术中的比较见解。右美托咪定-氯胺酮联合治疗术中稳定性好,呼吸系统并发症少,但恢复时间较长。这些发现可以指导临床医生选择适当的镇静策略,以提高涉及共享气道管理的病例的安全性和手术结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Oral Health
BMC Oral Health DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
481
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Oral Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the mouth, teeth and gums, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信