Validation of single and combined screening tools for the detection of poststroke mood disorders in acute stroke patients in Singapore.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Matthew H S Ng, Lai Gwen Chan
{"title":"Validation of single and combined screening tools for the detection of poststroke mood disorders in acute stroke patients in Singapore.","authors":"Matthew H S Ng, Lai Gwen Chan","doi":"10.1186/s13030-025-00341-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Screening tools such as the Patient Healthcare Questionnaire (PHQ) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) are useful for detecting poststroke depression (PSD). However, validation of these tools has yet to be conducted in the Singapore stroke population.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 138 adults were administered the HADS and both two- and nine-item versions of the PHQ. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were utilized to validate these scales against the gold standard diagnosis of PSD through the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID-IV).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All the tools examined in this study had good convergent validity (rs = 0.55-0.89) and discriminative power (Area Under Curve: 0.849-0.887). The optimal cut-off scores were ≥ 7 for the HADS depression and anxiety subscales, ≥ 10 for the total score, ≥ 2 for the PHQ-2 and ≥ 8 for the PHQ-9. Additional analyses suggest that the use of both the PHQ and the HADS in specific combinations further improved diagnostic performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both the PHQ and the HADS are acceptable tools for screening for poststroke depression in Singaporean inpatient rehabilitation care settings. Furthermore, our findings lead us to recommend using PHQ-9 with HADS-A for superior screening performance at sensitivity = 83.33%, specificity = 88.33%, positive predictive value = 51.72%, and negative predictive value = 97.25%.</p>","PeriodicalId":9027,"journal":{"name":"BioPsychoSocial Medicine","volume":"19 1","pages":"18"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12506412/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioPsychoSocial Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13030-025-00341-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Screening tools such as the Patient Healthcare Questionnaire (PHQ) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) are useful for detecting poststroke depression (PSD). However, validation of these tools has yet to be conducted in the Singapore stroke population.

Method: A total of 138 adults were administered the HADS and both two- and nine-item versions of the PHQ. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were utilized to validate these scales against the gold standard diagnosis of PSD through the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID-IV).

Results: All the tools examined in this study had good convergent validity (rs = 0.55-0.89) and discriminative power (Area Under Curve: 0.849-0.887). The optimal cut-off scores were ≥ 7 for the HADS depression and anxiety subscales, ≥ 10 for the total score, ≥ 2 for the PHQ-2 and ≥ 8 for the PHQ-9. Additional analyses suggest that the use of both the PHQ and the HADS in specific combinations further improved diagnostic performance.

Conclusion: Both the PHQ and the HADS are acceptable tools for screening for poststroke depression in Singaporean inpatient rehabilitation care settings. Furthermore, our findings lead us to recommend using PHQ-9 with HADS-A for superior screening performance at sensitivity = 83.33%, specificity = 88.33%, positive predictive value = 51.72%, and negative predictive value = 97.25%.

Abstract Image

新加坡急性脑卒中患者卒中后情绪障碍检测的单一和联合筛查工具的验证。
目的:患者健康问卷(PHQ)和医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)等筛查工具对卒中后抑郁(PSD)的检测有重要意义。然而,这些工具尚未在新加坡卒中人群中进行验证。方法:共有138名成年人接受了HADS和两项和九项版本的PHQ。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析,通过DSM-IV (SCID-IV)结构化临床访谈来验证这些量表是否符合PSD的金标准诊断。结果:所有工具均具有良好的收敛效度(rs = 0.55 ~ 0.89)和判别能力(曲线下面积:0.849 ~ 0.887)。HADS抑郁和焦虑亚量表的最佳分值为≥7分,总分≥10分,PHQ-2分值≥2分,PHQ-9分值≥8分。其他分析表明,PHQ和HADS在特定组合中的使用进一步提高了诊断性能。结论:PHQ和HADS都是新加坡住院康复护理机构卒中后抑郁筛查的可接受工具。此外,我们的研究结果表明,PHQ-9与HADS-A的筛查效果更好,灵敏度为83.33%,特异性为88.33%,阳性预测值为51.72%,阴性预测值为97.25%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BioPsychoSocial Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal that encompasses all aspects of the interrelationships between the biological, psychological, social, and behavioral factors of health and illness. BioPsychoSocial Medicine is the official journal of the Japanese Society of Psychosomatic Medicine, and publishes research on psychosomatic disorders and diseases that are characterized by objective organic changes and/or functional changes that could be induced, progressed, aggravated, or exacerbated by psychological, social, and/or behavioral factors and their associated psychosomatic treatments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书