Obstetric outcomes following artificial and natural cycle frozen embryo transfer in patients with and without endometriosis: a national cohort study.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Eun Hee Yu, Hyun Joo Lee, Sul Lee, Hyung Joon Yoon, Seung Chul Kim, Jong Kil Joo, Yong Jin Na
{"title":"Obstetric outcomes following artificial and natural cycle frozen embryo transfer in patients with and without endometriosis: a national cohort study.","authors":"Eun Hee Yu, Hyun Joo Lee, Sul Lee, Hyung Joon Yoon, Seung Chul Kim, Jong Kil Joo, Yong Jin Na","doi":"10.1186/s12884-025-08314-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endometriosis is a common cause of infertility in women of reproductive age, and many affected women require assisted reproductive technology (ART) to conceive. It is also associated with increased risks of adverse obstetric complications. However, the impact of different frozen embryo transfer (FET) protocols on outcomes in this population remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate obstetric outcomes after FET, comparing endometrial preparation methods in women with and without endometriosis using a nationwide cohort from the Republic of Korea.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from the National Health Insurance Service database (October 2017 to December 2021), including 44,118 singleton pregnancies following in vitro fertilization. The the artificial cycle (AC)-FET and the natural cycle (NC)-FET groups were distinguished based on prescription records, and patients were further categorized into endometriosis and non-endometriosis groups using the ICD-10 code N80. Logistic regression models were used to compare pregnancy and obstetric outcomes between AC-FET and NC-FET, and interaction analyses were conducted to assess whether the effects of FET protocols differed between patients with and without endometriosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In endometriosis patients, AC-FET did not differ from NC-FET in miscarriage or term birth rates. In non-endometriosis patients, however, AC-FET was associated with higher miscarriage risk and lower term birth rate. For obstetric outcomes, AC-FET increased the risks of threatened abortion, HDP, and placenta previa in endometriosis patients. There was an interaction effect between endometrial preparation methods (AC-FET and NC-FET) and with or without endometriosis on the risks of threatened abortion (P = 0.046), suggesting a stronger association between threatened abortion and AC-FET in women with endometriosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AC-FET was associated with an increased risk of adverse obstetric outcomes, including threatened abortion, HDP, and placenta previa in endometriosis patients. The additive effect observed for threatened abortion underscores the need for careful monitoring during early pregnancy in this population and supports considering NC-FET for those at high risk of miscarriage.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"25 1","pages":"1047"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12505903/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-08314-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Endometriosis is a common cause of infertility in women of reproductive age, and many affected women require assisted reproductive technology (ART) to conceive. It is also associated with increased risks of adverse obstetric complications. However, the impact of different frozen embryo transfer (FET) protocols on outcomes in this population remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate obstetric outcomes after FET, comparing endometrial preparation methods in women with and without endometriosis using a nationwide cohort from the Republic of Korea.

Methods: We analyzed data from the National Health Insurance Service database (October 2017 to December 2021), including 44,118 singleton pregnancies following in vitro fertilization. The the artificial cycle (AC)-FET and the natural cycle (NC)-FET groups were distinguished based on prescription records, and patients were further categorized into endometriosis and non-endometriosis groups using the ICD-10 code N80. Logistic regression models were used to compare pregnancy and obstetric outcomes between AC-FET and NC-FET, and interaction analyses were conducted to assess whether the effects of FET protocols differed between patients with and without endometriosis.

Results: In endometriosis patients, AC-FET did not differ from NC-FET in miscarriage or term birth rates. In non-endometriosis patients, however, AC-FET was associated with higher miscarriage risk and lower term birth rate. For obstetric outcomes, AC-FET increased the risks of threatened abortion, HDP, and placenta previa in endometriosis patients. There was an interaction effect between endometrial preparation methods (AC-FET and NC-FET) and with or without endometriosis on the risks of threatened abortion (P = 0.046), suggesting a stronger association between threatened abortion and AC-FET in women with endometriosis.

Conclusions: AC-FET was associated with an increased risk of adverse obstetric outcomes, including threatened abortion, HDP, and placenta previa in endometriosis patients. The additive effect observed for threatened abortion underscores the need for careful monitoring during early pregnancy in this population and supports considering NC-FET for those at high risk of miscarriage.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

有子宫内膜异位症和无子宫内膜异位症患者人工和自然周期冷冻胚胎移植后的产科结局:一项国家队列研究
背景:子宫内膜异位症是育龄妇女不孕症的常见原因,许多受影响的妇女需要辅助生殖技术(ART)来怀孕。它还与不良产科并发症的风险增加有关。然而,不同冷冻胚胎移植(FET)方案对这一人群结局的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估FET后的产科结果,比较有子宫内膜异位症和无子宫内膜异位症妇女的子宫内膜准备方法。方法:我们分析了国民健康保险服务数据库(2017年10月至2021年12月)的数据,包括44118例体外受精后的单胎妊娠。根据处方记录区分人工周期(AC)-FET组和自然周期(NC)-FET组,并使用ICD-10代码N80将患者进一步分为子宫内膜异位症组和非子宫内膜异位症组。使用Logistic回归模型比较AC-FET和NC-FET的妊娠和产科结局,并进行交互分析以评估FET方案在子宫内膜异位症患者和非子宫内膜异位症患者之间的效果是否存在差异。结果:在子宫内膜异位症患者中,AC-FET与NC-FET在流产率和足月出生率方面没有差异。然而,在非子宫内膜异位症患者中,AC-FET与较高的流产风险和较低的足月出生率相关。对于产科结果,AC-FET增加了子宫内膜异位症患者先兆流产、HDP和前置胎盘的风险。子宫内膜准备方法(AC-FET和NC-FET)与有无子宫内膜异位症对先兆流产的风险存在交互作用(P = 0.046),提示子宫内膜异位症患者先兆流产与AC-FET有较强的相关性。结论:AC-FET与子宫内膜异位症患者不良产科结局的风险增加有关,包括先兆流产、HDP和前置胎盘。在先兆流产中观察到的累加效应强调了在这一人群早期妊娠期间仔细监测的必要性,并支持在流产高风险人群中考虑NC-FET。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信