Age-Invariance of the ICD-11 Maladaptive Trait Structure and Connections to Personality Pathology.

IF 3.4 2区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL

Assessment Pub Date : 2025-10-08 DOI:10.1177/10731911251365743

Gina Rossi, Carmen Diaz-Batanero, Sebastiaan P J van Alphen, Arjan C Videler

{"title":"Age-Invariance of the ICD-11 Maladaptive Trait Structure and Connections to Personality Pathology.","authors":"Gina Rossi, Carmen Diaz-Batanero, Sebastiaan P J van Alphen, Arjan C Videler","doi":"10.1177/10731911251365743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Abundant critiques of the categorical approach to personality disorders (PD) resulted in the launch of the 11th International Classification of Diseases dimensional (ICD-11) model. This model provides stylistic descriptions of PD expression by trait levels of Negative Affectivity, Detachment, Dissociality, Disinhibition, and Anankastia. Earlier studies on the structure of ICD-11 maladaptive traits with the Personality Inventory for ICD-11 (PiCD), provided support for a four-factor solution, yet age-invariance was not examined. Assessment can be hindered by age-biased PD features. Therefore, the current study demonstrated scalar measurement invariance of the four-factor solution in a sample of 685 younger and 223 older community dwelling adults. Older adults scored significantly lower than younger adults on Negative Affectivity and Dissociality, yet the relations between PiCD trait domains and measures of personality pathology were largely comparable across age groups. These results are promising for accurate measurement of maladaptive traits across the whole adult lifespan.</p>","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"10731911251365743"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911251365743","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abundant critiques of the categorical approach to personality disorders (PD) resulted in the launch of the 11th International Classification of Diseases dimensional (ICD-11) model. This model provides stylistic descriptions of PD expression by trait levels of Negative Affectivity, Detachment, Dissociality, Disinhibition, and Anankastia. Earlier studies on the structure of ICD-11 maladaptive traits with the Personality Inventory for ICD-11 (PiCD), provided support for a four-factor solution, yet age-invariance was not examined. Assessment can be hindered by age-biased PD features. Therefore, the current study demonstrated scalar measurement invariance of the four-factor solution in a sample of 685 younger and 223 older community dwelling adults. Older adults scored significantly lower than younger adults on Negative Affectivity and Dissociality, yet the relations between PiCD trait domains and measures of personality pathology were largely comparable across age groups. These results are promising for accurate measurement of maladaptive traits across the whole adult lifespan.

查看原文本刊更多论文

ICD-11不适应特征结构的年龄不变性及其与人格病理的联系。

对人格障碍（PD）分类方法的大量批评导致了第11个国际疾病维度分类（ICD-11）模型的推出。该模型通过消极情感、分离、解离、去抑制和焦虑等特征水平提供了PD表达的文体描述。早期使用ICD-11人格量表（PiCD）对ICD-11适应不良特征结构的研究为四因素解决方案提供了支持，但没有检查年龄不变性。年龄偏倚的PD特征会阻碍评估。因此，目前的研究在685名年轻人和223名老年社区居民的样本中证明了四因素解决方案的标量测量不变性。老年人在消极情感和分离性上的得分明显低于年轻人，但PiCD特征域和人格病理测量之间的关系在不同年龄组之间具有很大的可比性。这些结果有望在整个成年生命周期中准确测量适应不良的特征。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Assessment PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-

CiteScore

8.90

自引率

2.60%

发文量

期刊介绍： Assessment publishes articles in the domain of applied clinical assessment. The emphasis of this journal is on publication of information of relevance to the use of assessment measures, including test development, validation, and interpretation practices. The scope of the journal includes research that can inform assessment practices in mental health, forensic, medical, and other applied settings. Papers that focus on the assessment of cognitive and neuropsychological functioning, personality, and psychopathology are invited. Most papers published in Assessment report the results of original empirical research, however integrative review articles and scholarly case studies will also be considered.