Central venous catheter infections: building a causal model with expert domain knowledge to inform future clinical trials.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Jessica A Schults, Yue Wu, Thomas Snelling, Gladymar Pérez Chacón, Daner Ball, Karina Charles, Julie Marsh, Charlie McLeod, Hideto Yasuda, Claire M Rickard
{"title":"Central venous catheter infections: building a causal model with expert domain knowledge to inform future clinical trials.","authors":"Jessica A Schults, Yue Wu, Thomas Snelling, Gladymar Pérez Chacón, Daner Ball, Karina Charles, Julie Marsh, Charlie McLeod, Hideto Yasuda, Claire M Rickard","doi":"10.1186/s13756-025-01630-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Central venous catheters (CVCs) are essential for long-term therapies but carry a high risk of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs), which significantly impact patient outcomes and healthcare costs. This study aimed to develop a causal model for CLABSI using expert knowledge to guide future clinical trials and prevention strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We constructed a directed acyclic graph (DAG) informed by literature and expert knowledge elicitation. A multidisciplinary team of clinicians, including infectious disease and vascular access experts, participated in interviews and workshops to refine the DAG, resulting in a final model with 30 variables representing CLABSI development.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The expert-elicited DAG identified two main pathways, patient-related and CVC-related, each contributing to CLABSI risk. Variables and relationships in the DAG highlighted key patient characteristics, CVC management practices, and overlapping factors influencing infection. This model serves as a novel framework to understand CLABSI causation and supports trial design by identifying confounding factors, causal pathways, and meaningful endpoints.</p><p><strong>Conclusions/implications: </strong>Our causal DAG provides a structured representation of CLABSI risk factors, which may support the design of clinical trials examining interventions to reduce CVC-related infections. By clarifying causal mechanisms, the DAG can enhance the specificity of endpoints and improve the rigor of prevention strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":7950,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control","volume":"14 1","pages":"116"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12506371/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-025-01630-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Central venous catheters (CVCs) are essential for long-term therapies but carry a high risk of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs), which significantly impact patient outcomes and healthcare costs. This study aimed to develop a causal model for CLABSI using expert knowledge to guide future clinical trials and prevention strategies.

Methods: We constructed a directed acyclic graph (DAG) informed by literature and expert knowledge elicitation. A multidisciplinary team of clinicians, including infectious disease and vascular access experts, participated in interviews and workshops to refine the DAG, resulting in a final model with 30 variables representing CLABSI development.

Findings: The expert-elicited DAG identified two main pathways, patient-related and CVC-related, each contributing to CLABSI risk. Variables and relationships in the DAG highlighted key patient characteristics, CVC management practices, and overlapping factors influencing infection. This model serves as a novel framework to understand CLABSI causation and supports trial design by identifying confounding factors, causal pathways, and meaningful endpoints.

Conclusions/implications: Our causal DAG provides a structured representation of CLABSI risk factors, which may support the design of clinical trials examining interventions to reduce CVC-related infections. By clarifying causal mechanisms, the DAG can enhance the specificity of endpoints and improve the rigor of prevention strategies.

Abstract Image

中心静脉导管感染:用专家领域知识建立因果模型,为未来的临床试验提供信息。
目的:中心静脉导管(CVCs)对于长期治疗是必不可少的,但具有中枢线相关血流感染(CLABSIs)的高风险,这显著影响患者的预后和医疗保健费用。本研究旨在利用专家知识建立CLABSI的因果模型,以指导未来的临床试验和预防策略。方法:利用文献资料和专家知识的启发,构造一个有向无环图。包括传染病和血管通路专家在内的多学科临床医生小组参加了访谈和讲习班,以完善DAG,最终形成一个具有代表CLABSI发展的30个变量的模型。结果:专家诱导的DAG确定了两种主要途径,患者相关和cvc相关,每种途径都有助于CLABSI风险。DAG中的变量和关系强调了关键患者特征、CVC管理实践和影响感染的重叠因素。该模型作为一个理解CLABSI因果关系的新框架,并通过识别混杂因素、因果途径和有意义的终点来支持试验设计。结论/意义:我们的因果DAG提供了CLABSI危险因素的结构化表示,这可能支持临床试验的设计,以检查减少cvc相关感染的干预措施。通过阐明因果机制,DAG可以增强终点的特异性,提高预防策略的严谨性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -INFECTIOUS DISEASES
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
140
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control is a global forum for all those working on the prevention, diagnostic and treatment of health-care associated infections and antimicrobial resistance development in all health-care settings. The journal covers a broad spectrum of preeminent practices and best available data to the top interventional and translational research, and innovative developments in the field of infection control.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信