Does self-reference modulate the processing of all emotional words? The distinction between emotion-label and emotion-laden words.

IF 2.7 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Pilar Ferré, Marc Guasch, Cornelia Herbert
{"title":"Does self-reference modulate the processing of all emotional words? The distinction between emotion-label and emotion-laden words.","authors":"Pilar Ferré, Marc Guasch, Cornelia Herbert","doi":"10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is ample evidence of the influence of both self-reference and the emotional content of words in language processing and memory. This study examines the conjoint influence of both factors in a variant of the affective HisMine-Paradigm. Participants were presented with pairs of words, that comprised emotional (positive and negative) or neutral words, preceded either by the first-person possessive pronoun \"my\" (self-reference) or by the definite article \"the\" (no-reference). Emotional words were divided into emotion-label words (e.g., happiness) and emotion-laden words (e.g., party). Participants were asked to perform an affective evaluation task (i.e., to decide if the word pair conveyed a positive, negative or neutral meaning), followed by a valence rating task (i.e., to rate the word pair in terms of their valence) and an unexpected free recall task. The results for positive words, but not negative words, showed that self-reference facilitated the affective evaluation task and led to more extreme valence ratings. These modulatory effects were observed in emotion-laden words, but not in emotion-label words. These findings support a self-positivity bias, and the literature about the modulation of emotional word processing by self-reference, yet point out the relevance of the distinction between emotion-label words and emotion-laden words.</p>","PeriodicalId":7141,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychologica","volume":"260 ","pages":"105689"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychologica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105689","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is ample evidence of the influence of both self-reference and the emotional content of words in language processing and memory. This study examines the conjoint influence of both factors in a variant of the affective HisMine-Paradigm. Participants were presented with pairs of words, that comprised emotional (positive and negative) or neutral words, preceded either by the first-person possessive pronoun "my" (self-reference) or by the definite article "the" (no-reference). Emotional words were divided into emotion-label words (e.g., happiness) and emotion-laden words (e.g., party). Participants were asked to perform an affective evaluation task (i.e., to decide if the word pair conveyed a positive, negative or neutral meaning), followed by a valence rating task (i.e., to rate the word pair in terms of their valence) and an unexpected free recall task. The results for positive words, but not negative words, showed that self-reference facilitated the affective evaluation task and led to more extreme valence ratings. These modulatory effects were observed in emotion-laden words, but not in emotion-label words. These findings support a self-positivity bias, and the literature about the modulation of emotional word processing by self-reference, yet point out the relevance of the distinction between emotion-label words and emotion-laden words.

自我指涉是否调节所有情绪词的加工?情感标签词和充满情感的词之间的区别。
有充分的证据表明,自我指涉和词语的情感内容对语言加工和记忆都有影响。本研究考察了这两个因素在一种变体的情感hismine范式中的共同影响。研究人员向参与者展示了一组单词,这些单词包括情绪词汇(积极的和消极的)或中性词汇,它们的前面要么是第一人称所有代词“我的”(自我指称),要么是定冠词“the”(无指称)。情感词汇被分为带有情感标签的词汇(如“快乐”)和充满情感的词汇(如“聚会”)。参与者被要求完成一项情感评估任务(即决定这对词是表达积极、消极还是中性的意思),然后是一个效价评估任务(即根据它们的效价对这对词进行评级)和一个意外的自由回忆任务。结果表明,积极词的自我参照促进了情感评价任务,并导致了更极端的效价评分。这些调节作用在充满情绪的词中被观察到,而在带有情绪标签的词中没有。这些发现支持了自我积极倾向,以及关于自我指涉调节情绪词处理的文献,但指出了情绪标签词和情绪负载词之间区别的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Psychologica
Acta Psychologica PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
274
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Psychologica publishes original articles and extended reviews on selected books in any area of experimental psychology. The focus of the Journal is on empirical studies and evaluative review articles that increase the theoretical understanding of human capabilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信