Comparative Efficacy of Exercise Type on Visceral Adipose Tissue in Patients With Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review With Pairwise and Network Meta-Analyses.
Mousa Khalafi, Saeid Fatolahi, Michael E Symonds, Farnaz Dinizadeh, Sara K Rosenkranz, Alexios Batrakoulis
{"title":"Comparative Efficacy of Exercise Type on Visceral Adipose Tissue in Patients With Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review With Pairwise and Network Meta-Analyses.","authors":"Mousa Khalafi, Saeid Fatolahi, Michael E Symonds, Farnaz Dinizadeh, Sara K Rosenkranz, Alexios Batrakoulis","doi":"10.1111/obr.70031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this systematic review with pairwise and network meta-analyses was to examine the effects of different exercise types on visceral adipose tissue (VAT) in patients with prediabetes and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus using four main keywords including \"exercise training,\" \"visceral fat,\" \"diabetes,\" and \"randomization\" from inception to April 2025. Thirty-three randomized controlled trials or clinical trials with parallel groups were included (1740 patients), in which exercise training was compared with either nonexercise or other types of exercise training. Combined training (n = 5) (-0.63 [95% CI -0.95 to -0.30], p = 0.001), high-intensity interval training (n = 11) (-0.53 [95% CI -0.86 to -0.19], p = 0.001), and aerobic training (n = 24) (-0.38 [95% CI -0.59 to -0.18], p = 0.001), but not resistance training (n = 8) (-0.25 [95% CI -0.54 to 0.03], p = 0.08) were more effective for reducing VAT as compared with controls. Subgroup analyses based on age, health status, body mass index, or intervention duration confirmed that combined training, high-intensity interval training, aerobic training, but not resistance training, induced advantageous alterations in VAT compared to the control group. The main findings show that the P-score-based ranking of interventions reported the highest probability ranking for CT (0.89), followed by HIIT (0.76), AT (0.52), and RT (0.32). These findings provide compelling evidence to support the use of exercise training as a noninvasive and cost-effective nonpharmacological intervention for the reduction of VAT in patients with prediabetes and T2DM. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024598045.</p>","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e70031"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.70031","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The aim of this systematic review with pairwise and network meta-analyses was to examine the effects of different exercise types on visceral adipose tissue (VAT) in patients with prediabetes and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus using four main keywords including "exercise training," "visceral fat," "diabetes," and "randomization" from inception to April 2025. Thirty-three randomized controlled trials or clinical trials with parallel groups were included (1740 patients), in which exercise training was compared with either nonexercise or other types of exercise training. Combined training (n = 5) (-0.63 [95% CI -0.95 to -0.30], p = 0.001), high-intensity interval training (n = 11) (-0.53 [95% CI -0.86 to -0.19], p = 0.001), and aerobic training (n = 24) (-0.38 [95% CI -0.59 to -0.18], p = 0.001), but not resistance training (n = 8) (-0.25 [95% CI -0.54 to 0.03], p = 0.08) were more effective for reducing VAT as compared with controls. Subgroup analyses based on age, health status, body mass index, or intervention duration confirmed that combined training, high-intensity interval training, aerobic training, but not resistance training, induced advantageous alterations in VAT compared to the control group. The main findings show that the P-score-based ranking of interventions reported the highest probability ranking for CT (0.89), followed by HIIT (0.76), AT (0.52), and RT (0.32). These findings provide compelling evidence to support the use of exercise training as a noninvasive and cost-effective nonpharmacological intervention for the reduction of VAT in patients with prediabetes and T2DM. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024598045.
期刊介绍:
Obesity Reviews is a monthly journal publishing reviews on all disciplines related to obesity and its comorbidities. This includes basic and behavioral sciences, clinical treatment and outcomes, epidemiology, prevention and public health. The journal should, therefore, appeal to all professionals with an interest in obesity and its comorbidities.
Review types may include systematic narrative reviews, quantitative meta-analyses and narrative reviews but all must offer new insights, critical or novel perspectives that will enhance the state of knowledge in the field.
The editorial policy is to publish high quality peer-reviewed manuscripts that provide needed new insight into all aspects of obesity and its related comorbidities while minimizing the period between submission and publication.