A Framework for Evaluation of New Processing Technologies in Human Milk Banking

IF 14.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Vanessa Clifford, Leonie Walter, Laura D. Klein, Tong Wu, Yiting Wang, Nidhi Bansal
{"title":"A Framework for Evaluation of New Processing Technologies in Human Milk Banking","authors":"Vanessa Clifford,&nbsp;Leonie Walter,&nbsp;Laura D. Klein,&nbsp;Tong Wu,&nbsp;Yiting Wang,&nbsp;Nidhi Bansal","doi":"10.1111/1541-4337.70288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The purpose of this review was to devise a framework for validation studies to test new processing technologies in human milk banking. Human milk banks are an expanding service globally. They provide donor human milk to predominantly preterm and low-birth-weight infants, who represent a vulnerable population. The most common method used by milk banks to ensure the safety of human milk is Holder pasteurization. There has been significant interest in recent years in alternative pathogen inactivation techniques for human milk banking, which may better preserve nutritional content while maintaining an appropriate safety profile. At present, there is no global standard for evaluating and validating new processing technologies for human milk. A major difficulty in developing a standard to evaluate novel processing methods for human milk is that it is not fully established which components of human milk, beyond macronutrient content, contribute to better clinical outcomes in preterm infants. A validation study should ideally address both the safety and nutritional impact of a new technology for human milk. For food safety, the main goal remains to achieve complete inactivation of relevant pathogenic bacteria and viruses. The secondary goal is to ensure adequate nutritional quality of the final product, so that infants receive nutrition that is as close as possible to mother's own milk. We have done a comprehensive narrative review of the key safety parameters, and nutritional and immune components of human milk, to suggest a novel framework for process validation studies in human milk banking, including suggestions for sample size where appropriate.</p>","PeriodicalId":155,"journal":{"name":"Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety","volume":"24 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ift.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1541-4337.70288","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://ift.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1541-4337.70288","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this review was to devise a framework for validation studies to test new processing technologies in human milk banking. Human milk banks are an expanding service globally. They provide donor human milk to predominantly preterm and low-birth-weight infants, who represent a vulnerable population. The most common method used by milk banks to ensure the safety of human milk is Holder pasteurization. There has been significant interest in recent years in alternative pathogen inactivation techniques for human milk banking, which may better preserve nutritional content while maintaining an appropriate safety profile. At present, there is no global standard for evaluating and validating new processing technologies for human milk. A major difficulty in developing a standard to evaluate novel processing methods for human milk is that it is not fully established which components of human milk, beyond macronutrient content, contribute to better clinical outcomes in preterm infants. A validation study should ideally address both the safety and nutritional impact of a new technology for human milk. For food safety, the main goal remains to achieve complete inactivation of relevant pathogenic bacteria and viruses. The secondary goal is to ensure adequate nutritional quality of the final product, so that infants receive nutrition that is as close as possible to mother's own milk. We have done a comprehensive narrative review of the key safety parameters, and nutritional and immune components of human milk, to suggest a novel framework for process validation studies in human milk banking, including suggestions for sample size where appropriate.

Abstract Image

母乳库新加工技术评价框架。
本综述的目的是为验证研究设计一个框架,以测试母乳库中的新处理技术。母乳银行是一项正在全球扩展的服务。它们主要为早产儿和低出生体重婴儿提供捐赠母乳,这些婴儿是弱势群体。母乳库最常用的确保母乳安全的方法是霍尔德巴氏灭菌法。近年来,人们对母乳库的替代病原体灭活技术产生了极大的兴趣,这种技术可以更好地保留营养成分,同时保持适当的安全性。目前,还没有一个全球性的标准来评估和验证新的母乳加工技术。制定一个标准来评估新的母乳加工方法的一个主要困难是,除了常量营养素含量之外,还没有完全确定母乳中哪些成分有助于早产儿更好的临床结果。理想情况下,一项验证研究应该解决一项新技术对人乳的安全性和营养影响。就食品安全而言,主要目标仍然是实现相关致病菌和病毒的完全灭活。第二个目标是确保最终产品有足够的营养质量,使婴儿获得的营养尽可能接近母亲自己的乳汁。我们对母乳的关键安全参数、营养成分和免疫成分进行了全面的综述,提出了母乳库工艺验证研究的新框架,包括适当的样本量建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
26.20
自引率
2.70%
发文量
182
期刊介绍: Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety (CRFSFS) is an online peer-reviewed journal established in 2002. It aims to provide scientists with unique and comprehensive reviews covering various aspects of food science and technology. CRFSFS publishes in-depth reviews addressing the chemical, microbiological, physical, sensory, and nutritional properties of foods, as well as food processing, engineering, analytical methods, and packaging. Manuscripts should contribute new insights and recommendations to the scientific knowledge on the topic. The journal prioritizes recent developments and encourages critical assessment of experimental design and interpretation of results. Topics related to food safety, such as preventive controls, ingredient contaminants, storage, food authenticity, and adulteration, are considered. Reviews on food hazards must demonstrate validity and reliability in real food systems, not just in model systems. Additionally, reviews on nutritional properties should provide a realistic perspective on how foods influence health, considering processing and storage effects on bioactivity. The journal also accepts reviews on consumer behavior, risk assessment, food regulations, and post-harvest physiology. Authors are encouraged to consult the Editor in Chief before submission to ensure topic suitability. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on analytical and sensory methods, quality control, and food safety approaches are welcomed, with authors advised to follow IFIS Good review practice guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信