The dark side of affinity spaces for teacher professional learning

IF 8.1 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Daniel G. Krutka, Spencer P. Greenhalgh
{"title":"The dark side of affinity spaces for teacher professional learning","authors":"Daniel G. Krutka,&nbsp;Spencer P. Greenhalgh","doi":"10.1111/bjet.13593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <p>The affinity space framework has proven useful for explaining and understanding teacher activity on social media platforms. In this study, we explore the ‘dark side’ of teacher affinity spaces by documenting a partisan teachers' group on an alternative social media platform. We used a mix of a priori and emergent coding to analyse screenshots of posts and comments from a public teachers' group and group administrators' activity on the broader platform. Findings indicate that although the group administrators began with a focus on teachers, most participants were non-teachers with political (rather than professional) concerns about US education. Furthermore, administrators both freely engaged with political talking points in their activity outside the teachers' group and allowed the broader platform culture—including conspiratorial thinking, explicit racism and out-group villainization—to seep in. We conclude by describing how these findings correspond with the key characteristics of an affinity space, including an overlapping of affinities, a lack of concern for professional qualifications, and influence from the broader platform. These findings provide an illustrative example of how teacher affinity spaces can drift from their stated intention within the larger platform context.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <div>\n \n <div>\n \n <h3>Practitioner notes</h3>\n <p>What is already known about this topic\n\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>Social media spaces have been conceptualized as affinity spaces for educators.</li>\n \n <li>Most studies provide optimistic accounts of teacher professional learning on social media.</li>\n \n <li>Most research has analysed teachers' use of mainstream platforms.</li>\n </ul>\n <p>What this paper adds\n\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>We offer a detailed analysis of a partisan US teacher group on an alternative platform.</li>\n \n <li>Initial efforts to focus on teaching devolved into in-group identification and out-group villainization.</li>\n \n <li>This study highlights how the characteristics of affinity spaces can be detrimental to teacher professional learning.</li>\n </ul>\n <p>Implications for practice and/or policy\n\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>Administrators of online groups should recognize their important role in ensuring group purposes are enacted.</li>\n \n <li>Educators should assess whether the larger platform is conducive to cultivating affinity around the group's aims.</li>\n \n <li>Scholars and educators should consider that the characteristics of affinity spaces can be either positive or negative for teacher professional learning.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48315,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Educational Technology","volume":"56 6","pages":"2573-2594"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Educational Technology","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://bera-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjet.13593","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The affinity space framework has proven useful for explaining and understanding teacher activity on social media platforms. In this study, we explore the ‘dark side’ of teacher affinity spaces by documenting a partisan teachers' group on an alternative social media platform. We used a mix of a priori and emergent coding to analyse screenshots of posts and comments from a public teachers' group and group administrators' activity on the broader platform. Findings indicate that although the group administrators began with a focus on teachers, most participants were non-teachers with political (rather than professional) concerns about US education. Furthermore, administrators both freely engaged with political talking points in their activity outside the teachers' group and allowed the broader platform culture—including conspiratorial thinking, explicit racism and out-group villainization—to seep in. We conclude by describing how these findings correspond with the key characteristics of an affinity space, including an overlapping of affinities, a lack of concern for professional qualifications, and influence from the broader platform. These findings provide an illustrative example of how teacher affinity spaces can drift from their stated intention within the larger platform context.

Practitioner notes

What is already known about this topic

  • Social media spaces have been conceptualized as affinity spaces for educators.
  • Most studies provide optimistic accounts of teacher professional learning on social media.
  • Most research has analysed teachers' use of mainstream platforms.

What this paper adds

  • We offer a detailed analysis of a partisan US teacher group on an alternative platform.
  • Initial efforts to focus on teaching devolved into in-group identification and out-group villainization.
  • This study highlights how the characteristics of affinity spaces can be detrimental to teacher professional learning.

Implications for practice and/or policy

  • Administrators of online groups should recognize their important role in ensuring group purposes are enacted.
  • Educators should assess whether the larger platform is conducive to cultivating affinity around the group's aims.
  • Scholars and educators should consider that the characteristics of affinity spaces can be either positive or negative for teacher professional learning.

Abstract Image

亲和空间对教师专业学习的阴暗面
亲和力空间框架已被证明有助于解释和理解教师在社交媒体平台上的活动。在这项研究中,我们通过在另一个社交媒体平台上记录一个党派教师群体来探索教师亲和力空间的“阴暗面”。我们混合使用先验和紧急编码来分析来自公共教师小组和小组管理员在更广泛的平台上的活动的帖子和评论的截图。调查结果表明,尽管小组管理员开始关注教师,但大多数参与者都是非教师,他们对美国教育有政治(而不是专业)关注。此外,管理人员在教师小组之外的活动中自由地参与政治话题,并允许更广泛的平台文化——包括阴谋论思维、明确的种族主义和群体外的邪恶——渗透进来。最后,我们描述了这些发现如何与亲和力空间的关键特征相对应,包括亲和力的重叠,对专业资格的缺乏关注,以及来自更广泛平台的影响。这些发现提供了一个说明性的例子,说明教师亲和力空间如何在更大的平台背景下偏离他们所陈述的意图。社会媒体空间已经被概念化为教育者的亲和力空间。大多数研究对教师在社交媒体上的专业学习持乐观态度。大多数研究都分析了教师对主流平台的使用情况。我们在另一个平台上对一个党派化的美国教师团体进行了详细分析。最初把重点放在教学上的努力变成了群体内的认同和群体外的邪恶化。本研究强调了亲和性空间的特征对教师专业学习的不利影响。对实践和/或策略的启示在线组的管理员应该认识到他们在确保组目的实现方面的重要作用。教育者应该评估更大的平台是否有助于培养围绕群体目标的亲和力。学者和教育工作者应该考虑到亲和性空间的特征对教师专业学习既可以是积极的也可以是消极的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Educational Technology
British Journal of Educational Technology EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: BJET is a primary source for academics and professionals in the fields of digital educational and training technology throughout the world. The Journal is published by Wiley on behalf of The British Educational Research Association (BERA). It publishes theoretical perspectives, methodological developments and high quality empirical research that demonstrate whether and how applications of instructional/educational technology systems, networks, tools and resources lead to improvements in formal and non-formal education at all levels, from early years through to higher, technical and vocational education, professional development and corporate training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信