Toward Quantitative Assessments of Cybersecurity Countermeasure Efficacy

Ben Breisch, Kristin Voss, Will Barnum
{"title":"Toward Quantitative Assessments of Cybersecurity Countermeasure Efficacy","authors":"Ben Breisch,&nbsp;Kristin Voss,&nbsp;Will Barnum","doi":"10.1002/iis2.70077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Most organizations have limited cybersecurity budgets, but there is no standard methodology for prioritizing cyber countermeasure investment. Without a rigorous, quantitative methodology for measuring efficacy, organizations can never hope to allocate countermeasure investment effectively. Other industries such as medicine measure efficacy by combining multiple metrics into a single figure of merit. We seek to address the question of countermeasure efficacy measurement by reporting properties that can measure efficacy, aligning these properties to the high-level tactics laid out in the MITRE D3FEND™ framework, and proposing the combination of these properties with qualitative organizational priorities via a weight matrix. The resulting score for a given countermeasure (within a D3FEND tactic) begins to answer the question of quantitative prioritization of security countermeasures.</p>","PeriodicalId":100663,"journal":{"name":"INCOSE International Symposium","volume":"35 1","pages":"1603-1618"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INCOSE International Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://incose.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/iis2.70077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most organizations have limited cybersecurity budgets, but there is no standard methodology for prioritizing cyber countermeasure investment. Without a rigorous, quantitative methodology for measuring efficacy, organizations can never hope to allocate countermeasure investment effectively. Other industries such as medicine measure efficacy by combining multiple metrics into a single figure of merit. We seek to address the question of countermeasure efficacy measurement by reporting properties that can measure efficacy, aligning these properties to the high-level tactics laid out in the MITRE D3FEND™ framework, and proposing the combination of these properties with qualitative organizational priorities via a weight matrix. The resulting score for a given countermeasure (within a D3FEND tactic) begins to answer the question of quantitative prioritization of security countermeasures.

网络安全对策效能定量评估研究
大多数组织的网络安全预算有限,但没有标准的方法来优先考虑网络对策投资。如果没有一个严格的、定量的方法来衡量效率,组织永远不可能希望有效地分配对策投资。其他行业,如医药,通过将多个指标组合成一个单一的优点来衡量功效。我们试图通过报告可以测量功效的属性来解决对策功效测量的问题,将这些属性与MITRE d3fern™框架中列出的高级策略对齐,并通过权重矩阵提出这些属性与定性组织优先级的组合。给定对策的结果得分(在d3挡位策略中)开始回答安全对策的定量优先级问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书