Generative AI-supported progressive prompting for professional training: Effects on learning achievement, critical thinking, and cognitive load

IF 8.1 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Chia-Jung Li, Gwo-Jen Hwang, Ching-Yi Chang, Hui-Chi Su
{"title":"Generative AI-supported progressive prompting for professional training: Effects on learning achievement, critical thinking, and cognitive load","authors":"Chia-Jung Li,&nbsp;Gwo-Jen Hwang,&nbsp;Ching-Yi Chang,&nbsp;Hui-Chi Su","doi":"10.1111/bjet.13594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In professional training, developing critical thinking is essential for professionals to analyse problem situations and respond effectively to emergencies. Conventional professional training typically employs multimedia materials combined with progressive prompting (PP) to support trainees in constructing knowledge and solving problems on their own. However, for those trainees who have insufficient knowledge or experience, it could be challenging for them to understand and utilise the prompts for finding solutions to the problems to be dealt with. To provide a personalised advisor during the progressive prompting-based training process, this study proposed a generative artificial intelligence (GenAI)-supported PP (GenAI-PP) learning approach by employing GenAI to facilitate discussions with individual trainees regarding the prompts, thereby encouraging deeper thinking and critical analysis at each stage. This study adopted a quasi-experimental design to compare the effects of GenAI-PP and the conventional PP (C-PP) approach on students' learning outcomes. The participants were 62 newly qualified nurses with less than one year of clinical experience in Taiwan, who needed to learn to interpret electrocardiograms (ECGs) as part of their professional training. Results showed that the GenAI-PP group significantly outperformed the C-PP group on test scores (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) and critical thinking (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). Moreover, the GenAI-PP group experienced significantly lower extraneous cognitive load compared to the C-PP group (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). These findings suggest the potential of GenAI-PP in professional training; that is, GenAI could serve as a learning partner to discuss with trainees the prompts provided by the instructor to help them master core concepts and develop key career competencies, especially for training programs that require in-depth analysis and decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":48315,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Educational Technology","volume":"56 6","pages":"2550-2572"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Educational Technology","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://bera-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjet.13594","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In professional training, developing critical thinking is essential for professionals to analyse problem situations and respond effectively to emergencies. Conventional professional training typically employs multimedia materials combined with progressive prompting (PP) to support trainees in constructing knowledge and solving problems on their own. However, for those trainees who have insufficient knowledge or experience, it could be challenging for them to understand and utilise the prompts for finding solutions to the problems to be dealt with. To provide a personalised advisor during the progressive prompting-based training process, this study proposed a generative artificial intelligence (GenAI)-supported PP (GenAI-PP) learning approach by employing GenAI to facilitate discussions with individual trainees regarding the prompts, thereby encouraging deeper thinking and critical analysis at each stage. This study adopted a quasi-experimental design to compare the effects of GenAI-PP and the conventional PP (C-PP) approach on students' learning outcomes. The participants were 62 newly qualified nurses with less than one year of clinical experience in Taiwan, who needed to learn to interpret electrocardiograms (ECGs) as part of their professional training. Results showed that the GenAI-PP group significantly outperformed the C-PP group on test scores (p < 0.01) and critical thinking (p < 0.01). Moreover, the GenAI-PP group experienced significantly lower extraneous cognitive load compared to the C-PP group (p < 0.001). These findings suggest the potential of GenAI-PP in professional training; that is, GenAI could serve as a learning partner to discuss with trainees the prompts provided by the instructor to help them master core concepts and develop key career competencies, especially for training programs that require in-depth analysis and decision-making.

Abstract Image

生成式人工智能支持的专业培训渐进式提示:对学习成就、批判性思维和认知负荷的影响
在专业培训中,培养批判性思维对专业人员分析问题情况和有效应对紧急情况至关重要。传统的专业培训通常采用多媒体材料结合渐进式提示(PP)来支持学员自己构建知识和解决问题。然而,对于那些知识或经验不足的受训者来说,理解和利用提示来寻找解决问题的方法可能是一项挑战。为了在渐进式基于提示的培训过程中提供个性化的指导,本研究提出了一种生成式人工智能(GenAI)支持的PP (GenAI-PP)学习方法,通过使用GenAI促进与学员个人就提示进行讨论,从而鼓励在每个阶段进行更深入的思考和批判性分析。本研究采用准实验设计,比较GenAI-PP和传统PP (C-PP)方法对学生学习成果的影响。研究对象为62名台湾临床经验不足一年的新合格护士,他们需要学习解读心电图(ecg)作为其专业培训的一部分。结果显示,GenAI-PP组在测试成绩(p < 0.01)和批判性思维(p < 0.01)上显著优于C-PP组。此外,与C-PP组相比,GenAI-PP组的外部认知负荷显著降低(p < 0.001)。这些发现提示GenAI-PP在专业培训中的潜力;也就是说,GenAI可以作为一个学习伙伴,与学员讨论讲师提供的提示,帮助他们掌握核心概念和发展关键的职业能力,特别是对于需要深入分析和决策的培训项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Educational Technology
British Journal of Educational Technology EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: BJET is a primary source for academics and professionals in the fields of digital educational and training technology throughout the world. The Journal is published by Wiley on behalf of The British Educational Research Association (BERA). It publishes theoretical perspectives, methodological developments and high quality empirical research that demonstrate whether and how applications of instructional/educational technology systems, networks, tools and resources lead to improvements in formal and non-formal education at all levels, from early years through to higher, technical and vocational education, professional development and corporate training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信