Hailee E. Reist MD, Michael B. DiCosmo MD, Luke C. Seeker MD, Andrew H. Root BS, James D. Michelson MD, Nathaniel J. Nelms MD
{"title":"Donning Gloves Using the Sliding-Closed Technique Has a Larger Distance to Contamination at the Gown-Glove Interface","authors":"Hailee E. Reist MD, Michael B. DiCosmo MD, Luke C. Seeker MD, Andrew H. Root BS, James D. Michelson MD, Nathaniel J. Nelms MD","doi":"10.1016/j.artd.2025.101862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The surgical gown-glove interface is a known cause of bacterial contamination. Minimizing contamination from this interface can be achieved by optimizing the technique for donning gloves with the help of a sterile assistant. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the level of contamination of the inside of the glove cuff when employing a novel sliding-closed (SC) gloving technique vs a traditional open gloving technique.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a comparative study between a traditional open gloving technique and a novel SC gloving technique. Surgeons applied ultraviolet indicator lotion before donning a surgical gown and sterile gloves using either technique. Three surgeons were experienced with the SC technique and 3 surgeons had no experience with this technique. Contamination of each glove was analyzed by 2 blinded inspectors in a darkened room by measuring the distance from the cuff to the closest contamination.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Regardless of previous experience, the SC technique had a significantly greater distance to contamination compared to the open technique (open = 65 mm [interquartile range 46.3-98.8], SC = 150 mm [interquartile range 110-170], <em>P</em> ≤ 0.001). Surgeons with experience using the SC technique had a greater median distance to contamination (125 mm) than those who without experience with this technique (90 mm, <em>P</em> = .002).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Performing the SC-assisted gloving technique results in a significantly greater cuff to contamination distance, compared to the traditional open gloving technique. Surgeons should consider adopting this technique to help minimize infection risk alongside standard infection control measures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37940,"journal":{"name":"Arthroplasty Today","volume":"36 ","pages":"Article 101862"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroplasty Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344125002493","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The surgical gown-glove interface is a known cause of bacterial contamination. Minimizing contamination from this interface can be achieved by optimizing the technique for donning gloves with the help of a sterile assistant. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the level of contamination of the inside of the glove cuff when employing a novel sliding-closed (SC) gloving technique vs a traditional open gloving technique.
Methods
We conducted a comparative study between a traditional open gloving technique and a novel SC gloving technique. Surgeons applied ultraviolet indicator lotion before donning a surgical gown and sterile gloves using either technique. Three surgeons were experienced with the SC technique and 3 surgeons had no experience with this technique. Contamination of each glove was analyzed by 2 blinded inspectors in a darkened room by measuring the distance from the cuff to the closest contamination.
Results
Regardless of previous experience, the SC technique had a significantly greater distance to contamination compared to the open technique (open = 65 mm [interquartile range 46.3-98.8], SC = 150 mm [interquartile range 110-170], P ≤ 0.001). Surgeons with experience using the SC technique had a greater median distance to contamination (125 mm) than those who without experience with this technique (90 mm, P = .002).
Conclusions
Performing the SC-assisted gloving technique results in a significantly greater cuff to contamination distance, compared to the traditional open gloving technique. Surgeons should consider adopting this technique to help minimize infection risk alongside standard infection control measures.
期刊介绍:
Arthroplasty Today is a companion journal to the Journal of Arthroplasty. The journal Arthroplasty Today brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement of the hip and knee in an open-access, online format. Arthroplasty Today solicits manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas of scientific endeavor that relate to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with patient outcomes, economic and policy issues, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, and biologic response to arthroplasty. The journal focuses on case reports. It is the purpose of Arthroplasty Today to present material to practicing orthopaedic surgeons that will keep them abreast of developments in the field, prove useful in the care of patients, and aid in understanding the scientific foundation of this subspecialty area of joint replacement. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal''s area of interest. Their participation ensures that each issue of Arthroplasty Today provides the reader with timely, peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality.