Vehicle skidding risk evaluation based on the lateral inhomogeneous distribution of pavement friction coefficients

IF 8.2 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Zihang Weng, Yuchuan Du, Chenglong Liu, Zhen Leng, Difei Wu, Yishun Li
{"title":"Vehicle skidding risk evaluation based on the lateral inhomogeneous distribution of pavement friction coefficients","authors":"Zihang Weng, Yuchuan Du, Chenglong Liu, Zhen Leng, Difei Wu, Yishun Li","doi":"10.26599/frict.2025.9441186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Current methods for assessing pavement skid resistance are based on spot or line sampling, neglecting the lateral skidding risk of vehicles derived from the uneven distribution of pavement friction coefficients. Through mechanical analysis, this study illustrates that vehicles are susceptible to lateral instability when the road surface exhibits unequal friction coefficients between the left and right wheel tracks. Based on this finding, vehicle dynamics simulations are conducted to evaluate longitudinal and lateral braking distances under varying speeds and friction coefficient distributions. It was found that when the friction coefficients are below 0.5, the risk is dominated by the longitudinal braking distance. Conversely, when there is a significant disparity in friction coefficients between the left and right wheel tracks (exceeding 0.2), the risk is predominantly associated with lateral skidding. Sensitivity analysis further examined the combined effects of friction disparities and driving speed, revealing that when speed exceeds 80 km/h, lateral skidding risk induced by uneven friction becomes the dominant factor over longitudinal braking risk. A skidding risk assessment method is then proposed, incorporating simulation results and braking distance thresholds. Furthermore, a comprehensive evaluation framework is established, encompassing sampling strategies, paired friction coefficient analysis for left and right wheel tracks, and risk quantification. The key contribution of this study lies in highlighting the critical yet often neglected impact of lateral friction coefficient variation on vehicle skid safety. By simulating its risk implications, this research proposes a novel overall evaluation framework for pavement skid resistance, leveraging field-collected data. The proposed approach expands the scope of traditional skid resistance assessment, offering a more holistic perspective for improving road safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":12442,"journal":{"name":"Friction","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Friction","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26599/frict.2025.9441186","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current methods for assessing pavement skid resistance are based on spot or line sampling, neglecting the lateral skidding risk of vehicles derived from the uneven distribution of pavement friction coefficients. Through mechanical analysis, this study illustrates that vehicles are susceptible to lateral instability when the road surface exhibits unequal friction coefficients between the left and right wheel tracks. Based on this finding, vehicle dynamics simulations are conducted to evaluate longitudinal and lateral braking distances under varying speeds and friction coefficient distributions. It was found that when the friction coefficients are below 0.5, the risk is dominated by the longitudinal braking distance. Conversely, when there is a significant disparity in friction coefficients between the left and right wheel tracks (exceeding 0.2), the risk is predominantly associated with lateral skidding. Sensitivity analysis further examined the combined effects of friction disparities and driving speed, revealing that when speed exceeds 80 km/h, lateral skidding risk induced by uneven friction becomes the dominant factor over longitudinal braking risk. A skidding risk assessment method is then proposed, incorporating simulation results and braking distance thresholds. Furthermore, a comprehensive evaluation framework is established, encompassing sampling strategies, paired friction coefficient analysis for left and right wheel tracks, and risk quantification. The key contribution of this study lies in highlighting the critical yet often neglected impact of lateral friction coefficient variation on vehicle skid safety. By simulating its risk implications, this research proposes a novel overall evaluation framework for pavement skid resistance, leveraging field-collected data. The proposed approach expands the scope of traditional skid resistance assessment, offering a more holistic perspective for improving road safety.

Abstract Image

基于路面摩擦系数横向非均匀分布的车辆打滑风险评价
现有的路面抗滑性评估方法是基于点或线抽样,忽略了路面摩擦系数分布不均匀所带来的车辆侧滑风险。通过力学分析,本研究表明,当路面左右车轮履带摩擦系数不等时,车辆容易发生横向失稳。基于这一发现,进行了车辆动力学仿真,以评估不同速度和摩擦系数分布下的纵向和横向制动距离。研究发现,当摩擦系数小于0.5时,纵向制动距离对风险起主导作用。相反,当左右车轮轨迹之间的摩擦系数存在显著差异(超过0.2)时,风险主要与横向打滑有关。灵敏度分析进一步考察了摩擦差异和行驶速度的综合影响,发现当车速超过80 km/h时,由摩擦不均匀引起的横向滑动风险超过了纵向制动风险,成为主导因素。然后提出了一种结合仿真结果和制动距离阈值的滑动风险评估方法。在此基础上,建立了包括采样策略、左右轮轨配对摩擦系数分析和风险量化在内的综合评价框架。本研究的关键贡献在于强调了侧向摩擦系数变化对车辆打滑安全性的关键但往往被忽视的影响。通过模拟其风险影响,本研究利用现场收集的数据,提出了一种新的路面防滑性总体评估框架。提出的方法扩大了传统防滑性评估的范围,为改善道路安全提供了更全面的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Friction
Friction Engineering-Mechanical Engineering
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
13.20%
发文量
324
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Friction is a peer-reviewed international journal for the publication of theoretical and experimental research works related to the friction, lubrication and wear. Original, high quality research papers and review articles on all aspects of tribology are welcome, including, but are not limited to, a variety of topics, such as: Friction: Origin of friction, Friction theories, New phenomena of friction, Nano-friction, Ultra-low friction, Molecular friction, Ultra-high friction, Friction at high speed, Friction at high temperature or low temperature, Friction at solid/liquid interfaces, Bio-friction, Adhesion, etc. Lubrication: Superlubricity, Green lubricants, Nano-lubrication, Boundary lubrication, Thin film lubrication, Elastohydrodynamic lubrication, Mixed lubrication, New lubricants, New additives, Gas lubrication, Solid lubrication, etc. Wear: Wear materials, Wear mechanism, Wear models, Wear in severe conditions, Wear measurement, Wear monitoring, etc. Surface Engineering: Surface texturing, Molecular films, Surface coatings, Surface modification, Bionic surfaces, etc. Basic Sciences: Tribology system, Principles of tribology, Thermodynamics of tribo-systems, Micro-fluidics, Thermal stability of tribo-systems, etc. Friction is an open access journal. It is published quarterly by Tsinghua University Press and Springer, and sponsored by the State Key Laboratory of Tribology (TsinghuaUniversity) and the Tribology Institute of Chinese Mechanical Engineering Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信