Co-cultivation rescues suicidal Paenibacillus amylolyticus swarms.

Dana Ronin,Mads Frederik Hansen,Mette Burmølle
{"title":"Co-cultivation rescues suicidal Paenibacillus amylolyticus swarms.","authors":"Dana Ronin,Mads Frederik Hansen,Mette Burmølle","doi":"10.1093/ismejo/wraf225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bacterial locomotion is integral to acquiring resources and getting access to new niches. Swarming, a type of motility where flagellated bacteria cooperatively move together across a semi solid surface, is one example of how bacteria can colonize new territories. This collective behavior is temporally and spatially orchestrated, requiring task specialization of community members. In this study, we paired a swarming bacterium, Paenibacillus amylolyticus, with a non-swarmer, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, to investigate the impact on fitness of each strain. In dual-species conditions, the community swarm became significantly thicker and improved the ability of S. maltophilia to range into new territories. Swarming enabled P. amylolyticus to cross barriers of antimicrobials, whereas the thicker, dual-species swarm did not empower S. maltophilia to cross. Comparative studies of population dynamics revealed that over time, monospecies swarms of P. amylolyticus entered a state unable to grow despite still showing reductase activity. However, in a dual-species swarm, S. maltophilia rescued P. amylolyticus from this state. This rescue is attributed to the pH stabilization that occurs in this two-species combination, where S. maltophilia alkalizes the environment, thereby providing a more favorable environment for P. amylolyticus.","PeriodicalId":516554,"journal":{"name":"The ISME Journal","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The ISME Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ismejo/wraf225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bacterial locomotion is integral to acquiring resources and getting access to new niches. Swarming, a type of motility where flagellated bacteria cooperatively move together across a semi solid surface, is one example of how bacteria can colonize new territories. This collective behavior is temporally and spatially orchestrated, requiring task specialization of community members. In this study, we paired a swarming bacterium, Paenibacillus amylolyticus, with a non-swarmer, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, to investigate the impact on fitness of each strain. In dual-species conditions, the community swarm became significantly thicker and improved the ability of S. maltophilia to range into new territories. Swarming enabled P. amylolyticus to cross barriers of antimicrobials, whereas the thicker, dual-species swarm did not empower S. maltophilia to cross. Comparative studies of population dynamics revealed that over time, monospecies swarms of P. amylolyticus entered a state unable to grow despite still showing reductase activity. However, in a dual-species swarm, S. maltophilia rescued P. amylolyticus from this state. This rescue is attributed to the pH stabilization that occurs in this two-species combination, where S. maltophilia alkalizes the environment, thereby providing a more favorable environment for P. amylolyticus.
共同培养拯救了具有自杀倾向的溶淀粉芽孢杆菌群。
细菌的运动对于获取资源和进入新的生态位是不可或缺的。群居是一种运动方式,鞭毛细菌在半固体表面上合作移动,是细菌如何在新领域定居的一个例子。这种集体行为是在时间和空间上进行协调的,需要社区成员的任务专业化。在这项研究中,我们将一种群集的溶淀粉芽孢杆菌与一种非群集的嗜麦芽窄养单胞菌配对,以研究每种菌株对适应度的影响。在双种条件下,嗜麦芽链球菌的群落厚度显著增加,从而提高了嗜麦芽链球菌向新领地扩张的能力。群体使解淀粉假单胞菌能够跨越抗菌剂的屏障,而较厚的双种群体则不能使嗜麦芽假单胞菌进行交叉。种群动态的比较研究表明,随着时间的推移,单种溶淀粉假单胞菌群进入了一种无法生长的状态,尽管仍显示出还原酶活性。然而,在双种蜂群中,嗜麦芽链球菌将解淀粉链球菌从这种状态中解救出来。这种拯救归因于两种组合中pH值的稳定,其中嗜麦芽葡萄球菌使环境碱化,从而为解淀粉葡萄球菌提供了更有利的环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信