Byeongseon Go, Hyukjoon Kwon, Siheon Park, Dhrumil Patel and Mark M Wilde
{"title":"Sample-based Hamiltonian and Lindbladian simulation: non-asymptotic analysis of sample complexity","authors":"Byeongseon Go, Hyukjoon Kwon, Siheon Park, Dhrumil Patel and Mark M Wilde","doi":"10.1088/2058-9565/ae075b","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Density matrix exponentiation (DME) is a quantum algorithm that processes multiple copies of a program state σ to realize the Hamiltonian evolution . Wave matrix Lindbladization (WML) similarly processes multiple copies of a program state ψL in order to realize a Lindbladian evolution. Both algorithms are prototypical sample-based quantum algorithms and can be used for various quantum information processing tasks, including quantum principal component analysis, Hamiltonian simulation, and Lindbladian simulation. In this work, we present detailed sample complexity analyses for DME and sample-based Hamiltonian simulation, as well as for WML and sample-based Lindbladian simulation. In particular, we prove that the sample complexity of DME is no larger than , where t is the desired evolution time and ɛ is the desired imprecision level, as quantified by the normalized diamond distance. We also establish a fundamental lower bound on the sample complexity of sample-based Hamiltonian simulation, which matches our DME sample complexity bound up to a constant multiplicative factor, thereby proving that DME is optimal for sample-based Hamiltonian simulation. Additionally, we prove that the sample complexity of WML is no larger than , where d is the dimension of the space on which the Lindblad operator acts nontrivially, and we prove a lower bound of on the sample complexity of sample-based Lindbladian simulation. These results prove that WML is optimal for sample-based Lindbladian simulation whenever the Lindblad operator acts nontrivially on a constant-sized system. Finally, we point out that the DME sample complexity analysis in Kimmel et al(2017 npj Quantum Inf.3 13) and the WML sample complexity analysis in Patel and Wilde (2023 Open Syst. Inf. Dyn.30 2350010) appear to be incomplete, highlighting the need for the results presented here.","PeriodicalId":20821,"journal":{"name":"Quantum Science and Technology","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quantum Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/ae075b","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Density matrix exponentiation (DME) is a quantum algorithm that processes multiple copies of a program state σ to realize the Hamiltonian evolution . Wave matrix Lindbladization (WML) similarly processes multiple copies of a program state ψL in order to realize a Lindbladian evolution. Both algorithms are prototypical sample-based quantum algorithms and can be used for various quantum information processing tasks, including quantum principal component analysis, Hamiltonian simulation, and Lindbladian simulation. In this work, we present detailed sample complexity analyses for DME and sample-based Hamiltonian simulation, as well as for WML and sample-based Lindbladian simulation. In particular, we prove that the sample complexity of DME is no larger than , where t is the desired evolution time and ɛ is the desired imprecision level, as quantified by the normalized diamond distance. We also establish a fundamental lower bound on the sample complexity of sample-based Hamiltonian simulation, which matches our DME sample complexity bound up to a constant multiplicative factor, thereby proving that DME is optimal for sample-based Hamiltonian simulation. Additionally, we prove that the sample complexity of WML is no larger than , where d is the dimension of the space on which the Lindblad operator acts nontrivially, and we prove a lower bound of on the sample complexity of sample-based Lindbladian simulation. These results prove that WML is optimal for sample-based Lindbladian simulation whenever the Lindblad operator acts nontrivially on a constant-sized system. Finally, we point out that the DME sample complexity analysis in Kimmel et al(2017 npj Quantum Inf.3 13) and the WML sample complexity analysis in Patel and Wilde (2023 Open Syst. Inf. Dyn.30 2350010) appear to be incomplete, highlighting the need for the results presented here.
期刊介绍:
Driven by advances in technology and experimental capability, the last decade has seen the emergence of quantum technology: a new praxis for controlling the quantum world. It is now possible to engineer complex, multi-component systems that merge the once distinct fields of quantum optics and condensed matter physics.
Quantum Science and Technology is a new multidisciplinary, electronic-only journal, devoted to publishing research of the highest quality and impact covering theoretical and experimental advances in the fundamental science and application of all quantum-enabled technologies.