A Framework for Assessing the Opportunity for Advanced Research, Development, and Regulatory Approval of Medical Countermeasures: A Component of BARDA's Emerging Infectious Diseases Strategy.

Richard C White,Rachael G Lewis,James D Little,Brenda L Fredericksen,Carol L Sabourin,M Chelsea Lane,Shannon G Loelius,Kimberly A Hofmeyer,Matthew Steele,Xiaomi Tong,Robert A Johnson
{"title":"A Framework for Assessing the Opportunity for Advanced Research, Development, and Regulatory Approval of Medical Countermeasures: A Component of BARDA's Emerging Infectious Diseases Strategy.","authors":"Richard C White,Rachael G Lewis,James D Little,Brenda L Fredericksen,Carol L Sabourin,M Chelsea Lane,Shannon G Loelius,Kimberly A Hofmeyer,Matthew Steele,Xiaomi Tong,Robert A Johnson","doi":"10.1093/infdis/jiaf486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nThe advanced research, development, and regulatory approval of medical countermeasures (MCMs) for emerging pathogens remains critical to national health security. We created a conceptual framework to assess the feasibility of generating pivotal data to support FDA regulatory approval of vaccines and therapeutics against known pathogens. Our framework is intended to guide key portfolio decisions on developing MCMs for emerging viral pathogens.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThis framework draws on prior experience with MCM development programs, current FDA guidance, and insights from scientific, regulatory, and public health subject matter experts. We identified key requirements that impact the ability to generate pivotal data and assessed the likelihood of meeting these requirements based on current epidemiology, technical capabilities, and infrastructure. To demonstrate utility, we applied the framework to a subset of prioritized pathogens.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nWe identified eight factors central to assessing the feasibility of advanced development and FDA approval of vaccines and therapeutics. These factors were used to evaluate seven emerging pathogens to illustrate how the framework may inform investment decisions across disease contexts.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThis framework supports more efficient resource allocation by highlighting MCM candidates with the highest potential for FDA approval within existing regulatory paradigms. Given current conditions, vaccine development appears more feasible than therapeutics for the pathogens assessed, although regulatory pathways remain product- and context-specific. Close consultation with the FDA will be critical in defining appropriate regulatory strategies. This framework offers a structured, proactive approach to advance MCM development and strengthen national preparedness against emerging pathogens.","PeriodicalId":501010,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiaf486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND The advanced research, development, and regulatory approval of medical countermeasures (MCMs) for emerging pathogens remains critical to national health security. We created a conceptual framework to assess the feasibility of generating pivotal data to support FDA regulatory approval of vaccines and therapeutics against known pathogens. Our framework is intended to guide key portfolio decisions on developing MCMs for emerging viral pathogens. METHODS This framework draws on prior experience with MCM development programs, current FDA guidance, and insights from scientific, regulatory, and public health subject matter experts. We identified key requirements that impact the ability to generate pivotal data and assessed the likelihood of meeting these requirements based on current epidemiology, technical capabilities, and infrastructure. To demonstrate utility, we applied the framework to a subset of prioritized pathogens. RESULTS We identified eight factors central to assessing the feasibility of advanced development and FDA approval of vaccines and therapeutics. These factors were used to evaluate seven emerging pathogens to illustrate how the framework may inform investment decisions across disease contexts. CONCLUSIONS This framework supports more efficient resource allocation by highlighting MCM candidates with the highest potential for FDA approval within existing regulatory paradigms. Given current conditions, vaccine development appears more feasible than therapeutics for the pathogens assessed, although regulatory pathways remain product- and context-specific. Close consultation with the FDA will be critical in defining appropriate regulatory strategies. This framework offers a structured, proactive approach to advance MCM development and strengthen national preparedness against emerging pathogens.
评估医学对策的先进研究、开发和监管批准机会的框架:BARDA新发传染病战略的一个组成部分。
新发病原体的医学对策(mcm)的先进研究、开发和监管批准对国家卫生安全至关重要。我们创建了一个概念性框架来评估产生关键数据的可行性,以支持FDA监管部门批准针对已知病原体的疫苗和治疗方法。我们的框架旨在指导针对新出现的病毒病原体开发mcm的关键投资组合决策。方法:本框架借鉴了MCM开发项目的前期经验、现行FDA指南以及科学、监管和公共卫生主题专家的见解。我们确定了影响生成关键数据能力的关键需求,并根据当前流行病学、技术能力和基础设施评估了满足这些需求的可能性。为了证明实用性,我们将该框架应用于优先病原体的子集。结果:我们确定了评估疫苗和疗法的晚期开发和FDA批准可行性的八个核心因素。这些因素被用来评估七种新出现的病原体,以说明该框架如何为跨疾病背景的投资决策提供信息。结论:该框架通过突出在现有监管范例中最有可能获得FDA批准的MCM候选药物,支持更有效的资源分配。鉴于目前的条件,开发疫苗似乎比针对所评估病原体的治疗方法更可行,尽管调控途径仍然是产品和环境特异性的。与FDA密切磋商对于确定适当的监管策略至关重要。该框架提供了一种结构化的、积极主动的方法,以推进MCM的发展并加强国家对新出现病原体的防范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信