Minimally Invasive vs Open Left Pancreatectomy for Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Long-Term Results of the Randomized DIPLOMA Trial.

IF 14.9 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Caro L Bruna,Jony van Hilst,Maarten Korrel,Leia R Jones,Gianpaolo Balzano,Bergthor Björnsson,Ugo Boggi,Svein Olav Bratlie,Olivier R Busch,Giovanni Butturini,Giovanni Capretti,Riccardo Casadei,Safi Dokmak,Bjørn Edwin,Alessandro Esposito,Massimo Falconi,Giovanni Ferrari,Thilo Hackert,Geert Kazemier,Bas Groot Koerkamp,Ruben H de Kleine,Tobias Keck,Dyre B Kleive,Arto Kokkola,David Kooby,Daan J Lips,Misha D P Luyer,Martina Guerra,Ravi Marudanayagam,Krishna Menon,I Quintus Molenaar,Matteo de Pastena,Nicolò Pecorelli,John N Primrose,Claudio Ricci,Olivier Saint Marc,Roberto Salvia,Per Sandström,Ales Tomazic,Ulrich F Wellner,Vincent S Yip,Alessandro Zerbi,Mahsoem Ali,Marcel G W Dijkgraaf,Marc G Besselink,Mohammad Abu Hilal,
{"title":"Minimally Invasive vs Open Left Pancreatectomy for Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Long-Term Results of the Randomized DIPLOMA Trial.","authors":"Caro L Bruna,Jony van Hilst,Maarten Korrel,Leia R Jones,Gianpaolo Balzano,Bergthor Björnsson,Ugo Boggi,Svein Olav Bratlie,Olivier R Busch,Giovanni Butturini,Giovanni Capretti,Riccardo Casadei,Safi Dokmak,Bjørn Edwin,Alessandro Esposito,Massimo Falconi,Giovanni Ferrari,Thilo Hackert,Geert Kazemier,Bas Groot Koerkamp,Ruben H de Kleine,Tobias Keck,Dyre B Kleive,Arto Kokkola,David Kooby,Daan J Lips,Misha D P Luyer,Martina Guerra,Ravi Marudanayagam,Krishna Menon,I Quintus Molenaar,Matteo de Pastena,Nicolò Pecorelli,John N Primrose,Claudio Ricci,Olivier Saint Marc,Roberto Salvia,Per Sandström,Ales Tomazic,Ulrich F Wellner,Vincent S Yip,Alessandro Zerbi,Mahsoem Ali,Marcel G W Dijkgraaf,Marc G Besselink,Mohammad Abu Hilal, ","doi":"10.1001/jamasurg.2025.4054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Importance\r\nThe DIPLOMA trial showed comparable radical resection rates after minimally invasive left pancreatectomy (MILP) and open left pancreatectomy (OLP) in patients with upfront resectable pancreatic cancer. Data on long-term overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) are currently lacking, but are required before the oncological efficacy of MILP can be confirmed.\r\n\r\nObjective\r\nTo determine the long-term oncological outcome, including OS and DFS, of MILP vs OLP in patients with upfront resectable left-sided pancreatic cancer in the DIPLOMA trial.\r\n\r\nDesign, Setting, and Participants\r\nThe randomized, patient-blinded and pathologist-blinded DIPLOMA trial was conducted between 2018 and 2021, with a follow-up duration of at least 36 months. It was a multicenter international trial that took place in 35 centers in 12 countries worldwide. Patients with upfront resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma of the body or tail of the pancreas were included.\r\n\r\nInterventions\r\nParticipants were randomly assigned to undergo MILP (laparoscopic and robotic) or OLP. Patients were blinded for the surgical approach.\r\n\r\nMain Outcomes and Measures\r\nMain outcomes included OS and DFS. Other outcomes include receipt of adjuvant therapy and time to start of adjuvant therapy.\r\n\r\nResults\r\nBetween May 2018 and May 2021, 258 patients were randomized to the MILP (131 patients) and OLP (127 patients) groups. After a median follow-up of 38 (IQR 36-46) months, 134 patients (52%) had died and 127 patients (55%) experienced disease recurrence. OS did not differ significantly between the MILP and OLP groups (median, 32 vs 34 months; stratified hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.72-1.44; P = .92). Also, DFS did not significantly differ between the MILP and OLP groups (median, 21 vs 17 months; stratified hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.68-1.35; P = .81). Adjuvant therapy was administered in 79 patients after MILP (79 of 113 [70%]) and 79 patients after OLP (79 of 110 [72%]) (P = .63). Time to adjuvant therapy was comparable between groups (median 59 vs 56 days; P = .92).\r\n\r\nConclusions and Relevance\r\nIn this long-term follow-up of the randomized DIPLOMA trial in patients with upfront resectable pancreatic cancer, oncological outcomes after MILP and OLP did not differ significantly, confirming the oncological safety of MILP.\r\n\r\nTrial Registration\r\nInternational Standard Registered Clinical/Social Study Number Registry Identifier: ISRCTN44897265.","PeriodicalId":14690,"journal":{"name":"JAMA surgery","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2025.4054","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance The DIPLOMA trial showed comparable radical resection rates after minimally invasive left pancreatectomy (MILP) and open left pancreatectomy (OLP) in patients with upfront resectable pancreatic cancer. Data on long-term overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) are currently lacking, but are required before the oncological efficacy of MILP can be confirmed. Objective To determine the long-term oncological outcome, including OS and DFS, of MILP vs OLP in patients with upfront resectable left-sided pancreatic cancer in the DIPLOMA trial. Design, Setting, and Participants The randomized, patient-blinded and pathologist-blinded DIPLOMA trial was conducted between 2018 and 2021, with a follow-up duration of at least 36 months. It was a multicenter international trial that took place in 35 centers in 12 countries worldwide. Patients with upfront resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma of the body or tail of the pancreas were included. Interventions Participants were randomly assigned to undergo MILP (laparoscopic and robotic) or OLP. Patients were blinded for the surgical approach. Main Outcomes and Measures Main outcomes included OS and DFS. Other outcomes include receipt of adjuvant therapy and time to start of adjuvant therapy. Results Between May 2018 and May 2021, 258 patients were randomized to the MILP (131 patients) and OLP (127 patients) groups. After a median follow-up of 38 (IQR 36-46) months, 134 patients (52%) had died and 127 patients (55%) experienced disease recurrence. OS did not differ significantly between the MILP and OLP groups (median, 32 vs 34 months; stratified hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.72-1.44; P = .92). Also, DFS did not significantly differ between the MILP and OLP groups (median, 21 vs 17 months; stratified hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.68-1.35; P = .81). Adjuvant therapy was administered in 79 patients after MILP (79 of 113 [70%]) and 79 patients after OLP (79 of 110 [72%]) (P = .63). Time to adjuvant therapy was comparable between groups (median 59 vs 56 days; P = .92). Conclusions and Relevance In this long-term follow-up of the randomized DIPLOMA trial in patients with upfront resectable pancreatic cancer, oncological outcomes after MILP and OLP did not differ significantly, confirming the oncological safety of MILP. Trial Registration International Standard Registered Clinical/Social Study Number Registry Identifier: ISRCTN44897265.
可切除胰腺癌的微创与开放左胰腺切除术:随机文凭试验的长期结果。
文凭试验显示,在可切除的胰腺癌患者中,微创左胰腺切除术(MILP)和开放式左胰腺切除术(OLP)的根治率相当。目前缺乏长期总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS)的数据,但在确认MILP的肿瘤疗效之前需要这些数据。目的在DIPLOMA试验中确定MILP与OLP在可切除的左侧胰腺癌患者中的长期肿瘤预后,包括OS和DFS。设计、环境和参与者这项随机、患者盲法和病理学盲法的DIPLOMA试验于2018年至2021年进行,随访时间至少为36个月。这是一项多中心国际试验,在全球12个国家的35个中心进行。包括胰腺体或胰腺尾部可切除的胰腺导管腺癌患者。干预措施参与者被随机分配接受MILP(腹腔镜和机器人)或OLP。患者采用盲法手术入路。主要结局和测量主要结局包括OS和DFS。其他结果包括接受辅助治疗和开始辅助治疗的时间。结果2018年5月至2021年5月,258例患者被随机分为MILP(131例)和OLP(127例)组。中位随访38个月(IQR 36-46)后,134例(52%)患者死亡,127例(55%)患者复发。MILP组和OLP组之间的OS无显著差异(中位数,32个月vs 34个月;分层风险比,1.02;95% CI, 0.72-1.44; P = 0.92)。此外,MILP组和OLP组之间的DFS无显著差异(中位数,21个月vs 17个月;分层风险比,0.96;95% CI, 0.68-1.35; P = 0.81)。79例MILP患者(113例中有79例[70%])和79例OLP患者(110例中有79例[72%])接受了辅助治疗(P = 0.63)。辅助治疗的时间组间比较(中位59天vs 56天;P = 0.92)。结论和相关性在这项针对可切除胰腺癌患者的随机DIPLOMA试验的长期随访中,MILP和OLP后的肿瘤学结果没有显著差异,证实了MILP的肿瘤学安全性。试验注册国际标准注册临床/社会研究编号注册标识符:ISRCTN44897265。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA surgery
JAMA surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
20.80
自引率
3.60%
发文量
400
期刊介绍: JAMA Surgery, an international peer-reviewed journal established in 1920, is the official publication of the Association of VA Surgeons, the Pacific Coast Surgical Association, and the Surgical Outcomes Club.It is a proud member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信