Rethinking translanguaging: (Trans)bordering, spatiality, and academic discourse socialization in a graduate TESOL classroom

IF 4.2 1区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS
Gengqi Xiao
{"title":"Rethinking translanguaging: (Trans)bordering, spatiality, and academic discourse socialization in a graduate TESOL classroom","authors":"Gengqi Xiao","doi":"10.1093/applin/amaf062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines how an applied linguistics graduate course instructor socializes students into academic concepts and norms in a graduate TESOL class in the U.S. through (trans)bordering, a semiotic process in which individuals create, negotiate, and contest boundaries that define acceptable academic practices, identities, and modes of communication. While translanguaging as a political act seeks to deconstruct linguistic borders, this article argues that bordering remains necessary for individuals to make sense of the world. This multimodal conversation analysis (CA) study draws data from a larger linguistic ethnography examining international students’ communicative practices in a U.S. university. Findings reveal that spatiality, the dynamic use of physical and imagined space to shape communication and meaning-making, is crucial in (trans)bordering. By examining how a graduate course instructor leverages existing and imagined space with other semiotic resources, we learn that (trans)bordering functions as a holistic process that socializes students into academic concepts and norms and provides a flexible framework that instructors use to mediate understanding of academic discourse.","PeriodicalId":48234,"journal":{"name":"Applied Linguistics","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amaf062","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines how an applied linguistics graduate course instructor socializes students into academic concepts and norms in a graduate TESOL class in the U.S. through (trans)bordering, a semiotic process in which individuals create, negotiate, and contest boundaries that define acceptable academic practices, identities, and modes of communication. While translanguaging as a political act seeks to deconstruct linguistic borders, this article argues that bordering remains necessary for individuals to make sense of the world. This multimodal conversation analysis (CA) study draws data from a larger linguistic ethnography examining international students’ communicative practices in a U.S. university. Findings reveal that spatiality, the dynamic use of physical and imagined space to shape communication and meaning-making, is crucial in (trans)bordering. By examining how a graduate course instructor leverages existing and imagined space with other semiotic resources, we learn that (trans)bordering functions as a holistic process that socializes students into academic concepts and norms and provides a flexible framework that instructors use to mediate understanding of academic discourse.
再思考译语:跨界、空间性与研究生TESOL课堂的学术话语社会化
本研究考察了在美国的研究生TESOL课堂上,应用语言学研究生课程讲师如何通过(跨)边界(一个符号学过程,在这个过程中,个人创造、协商和竞争定义可接受的学术实践、身份和交流模式的边界),使学生融入学术概念和规范。虽然译语作为一种政治行为试图解构语言边界,但本文认为,边界对于个人理解世界仍然是必要的。这项多模态会话分析(CA)研究从一个更大的语言民族志中提取数据,研究了一所美国大学的国际学生的交际实践。研究结果表明,空间性,即动态使用物理和想象空间来塑造交流和意义创造,在(跨)边界中至关重要。通过研究研究生课程教师如何利用现有和想象的空间与其他符号学资源,我们了解到(跨)边界作为一个整体过程,将学生融入学术概念和规范,并为教师提供一个灵活的框架,以调解对学术话语的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Linguistics
Applied Linguistics LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Applied Linguistics publishes research into language with relevance to real-world problems. The journal is keen to help make connections between fields, theories, research methods, and scholarly discourses, and welcomes contributions which critically reflect on current practices in applied linguistic research. It promotes scholarly and scientific discussion of issues that unite or divide scholars in applied linguistics. It is less interested in the ad hoc solution of particular problems and more interested in the handling of problems in a principled way by reference to theoretical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书