Association of ocular comorbidities on long-term patient-reported outcome measures after multifocal intraocular lens implantation.

IF 4.2 1区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Raimo Tuuminen,Sohee Jeon
{"title":"Association of ocular comorbidities on long-term patient-reported outcome measures after multifocal intraocular lens implantation.","authors":"Raimo Tuuminen,Sohee Jeon","doi":"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nTo evaluate the association of ocular comorbidities on long-term patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients bilaterally implanted with diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses (MFIOLs).\r\n\r\nDESIGN\r\nRetrospective clinical cohort study.\r\n\r\nSUBJECTS\r\nA total of 260 patients who underwent bilateral implantation of MFIOLs with postoperative emmetropia and follow-up exceeding three years.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nUncorrected visual acuities at near, intermediate and distance, contrast sensitivities, optical quality, spectacle-independent Visual Function Index (VF-14) questionnaire scores and dysphotopsia (graded 0-100 for glare, halos, and starburst) were measured. Ocular comorbidities included dry eye disease, prior corneal refractive surgery, vitreous opacities, macular disease, non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy, and glaucoma.\r\n\r\nMAIN OUTCOME MEASURES\r\nVF-14 scores at 3 years.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nEyes with comorbidities showed significantly worse uncorrected visual acuities at all distances (all P<0.001), lower Strehl ratio (0.034±0.023 vs. 0.042±0.027, P<0.001), and reduced contrast sensitivity under both photopic (1.33±0.21 vs. 1.40±0.18 area under the log contrast sensitivity function [AULCSF], P=0.001) and mesopic conditions (1.01±0.20 vs. 1.07±0.17 AULCSF, P<0.001) compared with eyes without comorbidities. VF-14 scores were significantly lower in eyes with comorbidities (87.1±13.8 vs. 95.6±5.1; P<0.001), with more glare reported (13.6±25.0 vs. 8.6±19.7; P=0.015). On multivariable analysis with age-, sex-, concomitant ocular comorbidities and MFIOL-type adjustment, dry eye disease, prior refractive surgery, vitreous opacities, and macular disease were independently associated with lower VF-14 scores (all P<0.001). Dry eye disease (B=18.0; 95%CI 8.4-27.6, P<0.001) and vitreous opacities (B=21.1; 95%CI 0.0-42.2, P=0.050) were associated with higher dysphotopsia overall scores. Increasing comorbidity burden, shorter tear-fluid break-up-time (r=0.207, P=0.005), and bilateral macular disease (P<0.001) were further associated with worse VF-14 scores.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nOcular comorbidities, particularly dry eye disease and vitreous opacities, which cause fluctuating visual disturbances, were associated with greater impairment in PROMs following diffractive MFIOL implantation.","PeriodicalId":7568,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"213 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2025.10.001","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the association of ocular comorbidities on long-term patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients bilaterally implanted with diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses (MFIOLs). DESIGN Retrospective clinical cohort study. SUBJECTS A total of 260 patients who underwent bilateral implantation of MFIOLs with postoperative emmetropia and follow-up exceeding three years. METHODS Uncorrected visual acuities at near, intermediate and distance, contrast sensitivities, optical quality, spectacle-independent Visual Function Index (VF-14) questionnaire scores and dysphotopsia (graded 0-100 for glare, halos, and starburst) were measured. Ocular comorbidities included dry eye disease, prior corneal refractive surgery, vitreous opacities, macular disease, non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy, and glaucoma. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES VF-14 scores at 3 years. RESULTS Eyes with comorbidities showed significantly worse uncorrected visual acuities at all distances (all P<0.001), lower Strehl ratio (0.034±0.023 vs. 0.042±0.027, P<0.001), and reduced contrast sensitivity under both photopic (1.33±0.21 vs. 1.40±0.18 area under the log contrast sensitivity function [AULCSF], P=0.001) and mesopic conditions (1.01±0.20 vs. 1.07±0.17 AULCSF, P<0.001) compared with eyes without comorbidities. VF-14 scores were significantly lower in eyes with comorbidities (87.1±13.8 vs. 95.6±5.1; P<0.001), with more glare reported (13.6±25.0 vs. 8.6±19.7; P=0.015). On multivariable analysis with age-, sex-, concomitant ocular comorbidities and MFIOL-type adjustment, dry eye disease, prior refractive surgery, vitreous opacities, and macular disease were independently associated with lower VF-14 scores (all P<0.001). Dry eye disease (B=18.0; 95%CI 8.4-27.6, P<0.001) and vitreous opacities (B=21.1; 95%CI 0.0-42.2, P=0.050) were associated with higher dysphotopsia overall scores. Increasing comorbidity burden, shorter tear-fluid break-up-time (r=0.207, P=0.005), and bilateral macular disease (P<0.001) were further associated with worse VF-14 scores. CONCLUSIONS Ocular comorbidities, particularly dry eye disease and vitreous opacities, which cause fluctuating visual disturbances, were associated with greater impairment in PROMs following diffractive MFIOL implantation.
多焦点人工晶状体植入术后眼部合并症与长期患者报告的结果测量的关系。
目的评价双侧植入衍射多焦人工晶状体(MFIOLs)患者眼部合并症与患者长期报告预后指标(PROMs)的关系。设计回顾性临床队列研究。研究对象共260例双侧mfiol植入术伴术后斜视且随访超过3年的患者。方法测量近、中、远距离裸眼矫正视力、对比敏感度、光学质量、不依赖眼镜的视功能指数(VF-14)问卷评分和失光症(眩光、光晕和星爆评分0-100)。眼部合并症包括干眼病、既往角膜屈光手术、玻璃体混浊、黄斑疾病、非增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变和青光眼。主要观察指标:3年时的vf -14评分。结果与无合共病的眼睛相比,有合共病的眼睛在所有距离下的未矫正视力均明显差(P<0.001), Strehl比值(0.034±0.023比0.042±0.027,P<0.001)较低,在光度条件下的对比敏感度(对数对比敏感度函数[AULCSF]下1.33±0.21比1.40±0.18,P=0.001)和中观条件下的对比敏感度(1.01±0.20比1.07±0.17 AULCSF, P<0.001)均较低。有合并症的眼睛的VF-14评分明显较低(87.1±13.8比95.6±5.1,P<0.001),眩光较多(13.6±25.0比8.6±19.7,P=0.015)。在多变量分析中,年龄、性别、伴发眼部合共病和mfiol型调整,干眼病、既往屈光手术、玻璃体混浊和黄斑疾病与较低的VF-14评分独立相关(均P<0.001)。干眼症(B=18.0; 95%CI 8.4-27.6, P<0.001)和玻璃体混浊(B=21.1; 95%CI 0.0-42.2, P=0.050)与较高的视力障碍总分相关。加重的共病负担、较短的泪液破裂时间(r=0.207, P=0.005)和双侧黄斑疾病(P<0.001)与较差的VF-14评分进一步相关。结论:眼部合并症,特别是干眼病和玻璃体混浊,引起波动性视力障碍,与衍射MFIOL植入术后prom的更大损害相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
406
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that welcomes the submission of original, previously unpublished manuscripts directed to ophthalmologists and visual science specialists describing clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations. Published monthly since 1884, the full text of the American Journal of Ophthalmology and supplementary material are also presented online at www.AJO.com and on ScienceDirect. The American Journal of Ophthalmology publishes Full-Length Articles, Perspectives, Editorials, Correspondences, Books Reports and Announcements. Brief Reports and Case Reports are no longer published. We recommend submitting Brief Reports and Case Reports to our companion publication, the American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports. Manuscripts are accepted with the understanding that they have not been and will not be published elsewhere substantially in any format, and that there are no ethical problems with the content or data collection. Authors may be requested to produce the data upon which the manuscript is based and to answer expeditiously any questions about the manuscript or its authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信