In-Hospital Outcomes of Type A Aortic Dissection Repair in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Population Study of National Inpatient Sample From 2015 to 2020.
Renxi Li, Deyanira J Prastein, Stephen J Huddleston
{"title":"In-Hospital Outcomes of Type A Aortic Dissection Repair in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Population Study of National Inpatient Sample From 2015 to 2020.","authors":"Renxi Li, Deyanira J Prastein, Stephen J Huddleston","doi":"10.1177/15385744251387757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundObstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a recognized risk factor for aortic dissection development due to its association with arterial hypertension, negative intrathoracic pressures during respiratory efforts, and further development of aortic false lumen. However, the impact of OSA on the outcomes of type A aortic dissection (TAAD) repair has not been extensively investigated. Therefore, this study aimed to perform a population-based analysis of the impact of OSA on in-hospital outcomes following TAAD repair.MethodsPatients who underwent TAAD repair were identified in National Inpatient Sample from the last quarter of 2015-2020. Multivariable logistic regressions were employed to compare the in-hospital outcomes between patients with and without OSA, where demographics, comorbidities, hospital characteristics, primary payer status, and transfer-in status were adjusted for.ResultsThere were 465 (10.86%) and 3817 (89.14%) patients with and without OSA who underwent TAAD repair. Patients with and without OSA had comparable in-hospital mortality (9.89% vs 15.75%, aOR = 0.744, 95 CI = 0.535-1.035, <i>P</i> = .08). Patients with OSA had a higher risk of diaphragmatic paralysis (0.86% vs 0.21%, aOR = 4.821, 95 CI = 1.405-16.539, <i>P</i> = .01) but lower risks of pericardial complications (12.04% vs 19.02%, aOR = 0.675, 95 CI = 0.501-0.909, <i>P</i> = .01) and cardiogenic shock (11.40% vs 18.21%, aOR = 0.643, 95 CI = 0.472-0.875, <i>P</i> = .01). All other in-hospital outcomes were comparable.ConclusionWhile OSA is a known risk factor for the development of TAAD, it does not appear to significantly affect short-term surgical outcomes. Future research should focus on stratifying OSA by duration and severity and examining the long-term prognosis of these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":"15385744251387757"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744251387757","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BackgroundObstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a recognized risk factor for aortic dissection development due to its association with arterial hypertension, negative intrathoracic pressures during respiratory efforts, and further development of aortic false lumen. However, the impact of OSA on the outcomes of type A aortic dissection (TAAD) repair has not been extensively investigated. Therefore, this study aimed to perform a population-based analysis of the impact of OSA on in-hospital outcomes following TAAD repair.MethodsPatients who underwent TAAD repair were identified in National Inpatient Sample from the last quarter of 2015-2020. Multivariable logistic regressions were employed to compare the in-hospital outcomes between patients with and without OSA, where demographics, comorbidities, hospital characteristics, primary payer status, and transfer-in status were adjusted for.ResultsThere were 465 (10.86%) and 3817 (89.14%) patients with and without OSA who underwent TAAD repair. Patients with and without OSA had comparable in-hospital mortality (9.89% vs 15.75%, aOR = 0.744, 95 CI = 0.535-1.035, P = .08). Patients with OSA had a higher risk of diaphragmatic paralysis (0.86% vs 0.21%, aOR = 4.821, 95 CI = 1.405-16.539, P = .01) but lower risks of pericardial complications (12.04% vs 19.02%, aOR = 0.675, 95 CI = 0.501-0.909, P = .01) and cardiogenic shock (11.40% vs 18.21%, aOR = 0.643, 95 CI = 0.472-0.875, P = .01). All other in-hospital outcomes were comparable.ConclusionWhile OSA is a known risk factor for the development of TAAD, it does not appear to significantly affect short-term surgical outcomes. Future research should focus on stratifying OSA by duration and severity and examining the long-term prognosis of these patients.
背景:阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)是公认的主动脉夹层发展的危险因素,因为它与动脉高血压、呼吸努力时的负胸内压和主动脉假腔的进一步发展有关。然而,OSA对A型主动脉夹层(TAAD)修复结果的影响尚未得到广泛研究。因此,本研究旨在对TAAD修复后OSA对住院预后的影响进行基于人群的分析。方法选取2015-2020年第四季度全国住院患者样本中接受TAAD修复的患者。采用多变量logistic回归比较OSA患者和非OSA患者的住院结果,其中调整了人口统计学、合并症、医院特征、主要付款人状况和转院状况。结果分别有465例(10.86%)和3817例(89.14%)OSA患者行TAAD修复。有无OSA患者的住院死亡率相当(9.89% vs 15.75%, aOR = 0.744, 95 CI = 0.535-1.035, P = 0.08)。OSA患者发生膈肌麻痹的风险较高(0.86% vs 0.21%, aOR = 4.821, 95 CI = 1.405 ~ 16.539, P = 0.01),心包并发症的风险较低(12.04% vs 19.02%, aOR = 0.675, 95 CI = 0.501 ~ 0.909, P = 0.01),心源性休克的风险较低(11.40% vs 18.21%, aOR = 0.643, 95 CI = 0.472 ~ 0.875, P = 0.01)。所有其他住院结果具有可比性。结论虽然OSA是TAAD发生的一个已知危险因素,但它似乎对短期手术结果没有显著影响。未来的研究应侧重于根据持续时间和严重程度对OSA进行分层,并检查这些患者的长期预后。