Optimization of axillary staging in breast cancer: efficacy of sentinel lymph node biopsy and targeted axillary dissection post-chemotherapy.

Aránzazu García-Ruiz, Isabel Martínez-Rodríguez, Néstor Martínez-Amador, Francisco Javier Gómez-de la Fuente, Aida Sánchez-Salmón, Julio Jiménez-Bonilla, Maria de Arcocha-Torres, Virginia Mendi Barcina, Fátima Rodríguez-Izquierdo, Nadia Virgínia Carvalho-Duarte, María Del Pilar Botanch-Domingo, Liliana Cabrera-Portillo, Pablo David Andrade-Mejía, Angélica Clavijo-Umbarila, Remedios Quirce
{"title":"Optimization of axillary staging in breast cancer: efficacy of sentinel lymph node biopsy and targeted axillary dissection post-chemotherapy.","authors":"Aránzazu García-Ruiz, Isabel Martínez-Rodríguez, Néstor Martínez-Amador, Francisco Javier Gómez-de la Fuente, Aida Sánchez-Salmón, Julio Jiménez-Bonilla, Maria de Arcocha-Torres, Virginia Mendi Barcina, Fátima Rodríguez-Izquierdo, Nadia Virgínia Carvalho-Duarte, María Del Pilar Botanch-Domingo, Liliana Cabrera-Portillo, Pablo David Andrade-Mejía, Angélica Clavijo-Umbarila, Remedios Quirce","doi":"10.1016/j.remnie.2025.500134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the contribution of sentinel node biopsy using lymphoscintigraphy in breast cancer (BC) with clip-marked lymph node involvement and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in axillary staging and reduction of potential false negatives from exclusively radiological localization.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A retrospective study of 20 women with BC and nodal involvement marked with clip and NACT. Lymphoscintigraphy was complemented with SPECT/CT in 12 patients. The correlation between lymphoscintigraphic sentinel lymph node (SLN) and the clip-marked node was analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Lymphoscintigraphy detected 34 axillary SLNs. SPECT/CT showed uptake in 10 of 16 clip-marked nodes (62.5%). During surgery, 39 nodes were removed; 33 (84.6%) were SLNs, 18 with clip, and 15 without clip. One SLN was not located surgically. Six clip-marked nodes (15.3%) showed no uptake. In 8 of 20 patients (40%), drainage to a single SLN was detected; this corresponded to the clip-marked node in 5 cases (non-metastatic) and non-clip-marked nodes in 3 cases (1 metastatic). In 12 of 20 patients (60%), lymphoscintigraphy showed drainage to more than one SLN. A total of 26 SLNs were detected: 13 SLNs with clip (5 metastatic) and 13 without clip (4 metastatic). Lymphoscintigraphy detected 5 SLNs in 4 of 20 patients (20%) that did not match the clip-marked node and were metastatic. The detection and removal rate of GCL was 97% and false negative rate was 16,67%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lymphoscintigraphy in BC with positive axilla before NACT detected metastases in a significant percentage of patients not identified with clip, being an essential tool for accurate axillary staging.</p>","PeriodicalId":94197,"journal":{"name":"Revista espanola de medicina nuclear e imagen molecular","volume":" ","pages":"500134"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista espanola de medicina nuclear e imagen molecular","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.remnie.2025.500134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the contribution of sentinel node biopsy using lymphoscintigraphy in breast cancer (BC) with clip-marked lymph node involvement and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in axillary staging and reduction of potential false negatives from exclusively radiological localization.

Material and methods: A retrospective study of 20 women with BC and nodal involvement marked with clip and NACT. Lymphoscintigraphy was complemented with SPECT/CT in 12 patients. The correlation between lymphoscintigraphic sentinel lymph node (SLN) and the clip-marked node was analyzed.

Results: Lymphoscintigraphy detected 34 axillary SLNs. SPECT/CT showed uptake in 10 of 16 clip-marked nodes (62.5%). During surgery, 39 nodes were removed; 33 (84.6%) were SLNs, 18 with clip, and 15 without clip. One SLN was not located surgically. Six clip-marked nodes (15.3%) showed no uptake. In 8 of 20 patients (40%), drainage to a single SLN was detected; this corresponded to the clip-marked node in 5 cases (non-metastatic) and non-clip-marked nodes in 3 cases (1 metastatic). In 12 of 20 patients (60%), lymphoscintigraphy showed drainage to more than one SLN. A total of 26 SLNs were detected: 13 SLNs with clip (5 metastatic) and 13 without clip (4 metastatic). Lymphoscintigraphy detected 5 SLNs in 4 of 20 patients (20%) that did not match the clip-marked node and were metastatic. The detection and removal rate of GCL was 97% and false negative rate was 16,67%.

Conclusion: Lymphoscintigraphy in BC with positive axilla before NACT detected metastases in a significant percentage of patients not identified with clip, being an essential tool for accurate axillary staging.

乳腺癌腋窝分期的优化:化疗后前哨淋巴结活检和靶向腋窝清扫的疗效。
目的:评价前哨淋巴结活检在乳腺癌(BC)中使用淋巴显像和新辅助化疗(NACT)对腋窝分期和减少单纯放射定位的潜在假阴性的贡献。材料和方法:回顾性研究20例女性BC和淋巴结累及的clip和NACT标记。12例患者行淋巴显像辅助SPECT/CT检查。分析淋巴扫描前哨淋巴结(SLN)与夹标淋巴结的相关性。结果:淋巴显像检出腋窝sln 34例。SPECT/CT显示16个夹子标记的淋巴结中有10个(62.5%)摄取。术中切除39个淋巴结;sln 33例(84.6%),带夹18例,无夹15例。1例SLN未通过手术定位。6个夹子标记的淋巴结(15.3%)未见摄取。20例患者中有8例(40%)检测到单个SLN引流;这与5例(非转移)的夹标记淋巴结和3例(1例转移)的非夹标记淋巴结对应。20例患者中有12例(60%)淋巴显像显示不止一个淋巴细胞淋巴结引流。共检测到26例sln: 13例有clip(5例转移),13例无clip(4例转移)。20例患者中有4例(20%)的淋巴显像检测到5个sln,这些sln与夹子标记的淋巴结不匹配,并且已经转移。GCL检出率为97%,假阴性率为16.67%。结论:在NACT前对膀胱癌腋窝阳性的患者进行淋巴显像检查,可以在未发现夹子的患者中检测到相当比例的转移,是准确腋窝分期的重要工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信