Strict Biosecurity and Epidemiological Segmentation Enable Partial Culling During a Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Outbreak.

IF 2.5 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Veterinary medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2025-10-02 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/VMRR.S539444
Martin J Oettler, Gerald Stumpf, Katja Schulz, Matthias Todte, Klim Hüttner, Heidemarie Heyne, Thomas C Mettenleiter, Franz J Conraths, Carola Sauter-Louis
{"title":"Strict Biosecurity and Epidemiological Segmentation Enable Partial Culling During a Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Outbreak.","authors":"Martin J Oettler, Gerald Stumpf, Katja Schulz, Matthias Todte, Klim Hüttner, Heidemarie Heyne, Thomas C Mettenleiter, Franz J Conraths, Carola Sauter-Louis","doi":"10.2147/VMRR.S539444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The mandatory procedures to be followed after official confirmation of an outbreak of category A animal infectious diseases, including highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI), is laid down in European and national legislation. Typically, an outbreak of HPAI results in the destruction of the entire poultry population on the affected holding.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>The presented case reports a deviation from this approach, demonstrating the practicality of partial culling in a highly biosecure, epidemiologically segmented holding. These on-site circumstances together with the specific risk assessment led to the elimination of only the affected unit, thereby inhibiting the further spread of the disease. After the destruction of the respective unit (farm), the other farms were closely monitored and tested continuously negative for HPAI virus (HPAIV) despite intensive systematic sampling. In the end, this procedure saved approximately 138,000 animals, ie 75% of the poultry population of the holding from destruction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This case demonstrates the effectiveness of proper management and high-level biosecurity to avoid excessive destruction of animals in case of an infectious disease outbreak. It might be suitable as a best-practice example in similar situations.</p>","PeriodicalId":75300,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":"16 ","pages":"25-37"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12499244/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/VMRR.S539444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The mandatory procedures to be followed after official confirmation of an outbreak of category A animal infectious diseases, including highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI), is laid down in European and national legislation. Typically, an outbreak of HPAI results in the destruction of the entire poultry population on the affected holding.

Case presentation: The presented case reports a deviation from this approach, demonstrating the practicality of partial culling in a highly biosecure, epidemiologically segmented holding. These on-site circumstances together with the specific risk assessment led to the elimination of only the affected unit, thereby inhibiting the further spread of the disease. After the destruction of the respective unit (farm), the other farms were closely monitored and tested continuously negative for HPAI virus (HPAIV) despite intensive systematic sampling. In the end, this procedure saved approximately 138,000 animals, ie 75% of the poultry population of the holding from destruction.

Conclusion: This case demonstrates the effectiveness of proper management and high-level biosecurity to avoid excessive destruction of animals in case of an infectious disease outbreak. It might be suitable as a best-practice example in similar situations.

在高致病性禽流感爆发期间,严格的生物安全和流行病学分割使部分扑杀成为可能。
背景:在正式确认爆发A类动物传染病,包括高致病性禽流感(HPAI)后应遵循的强制性程序,已在欧洲和国家立法中规定。通常情况下,高致病性禽流感的爆发会导致受影响养鸡场上的整个家禽种群被摧毁。病例介绍:所介绍的病例报告了这种方法的偏差,证明了在高度生物安全、流行病学上分段的控制中部分扑杀的实用性。这些现场情况加上具体的风险评估,只消灭了受影响的单位,从而抑制了疾病的进一步传播。在各自的单位(养殖场)被摧毁后,对其他养殖场进行了密切监测,尽管进行了密集的系统采样,但仍持续检测出高致病性禽流感病毒(HPAIV)呈阴性。最终,这一程序拯救了大约138,000只动物,即该饲养场75%的家禽免于被摧毁。结论:该案例表明,在传染病暴发时,适当的管理和高水平的生物安全措施是有效的,可以避免对动物的过度破坏。它可能适合作为类似情况下的最佳实践示例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信