Differentiating network structures and sex differences of pain-related outcomes, analgesic opioid dosages, and psychosocial factors for postoperative management: a study of PAIN OUT registry in seven Asian regions.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Yulin Huang, Hung Chak Ho, Yuchang Bao, Ruth Zaslansky, Winfried Meißner, Chi Wai Cheung
{"title":"Differentiating network structures and sex differences of pain-related outcomes, analgesic opioid dosages, and psychosocial factors for postoperative management: a study of PAIN OUT registry in seven Asian regions.","authors":"Yulin Huang, Hung Chak Ho, Yuchang Bao, Ruth Zaslansky, Winfried Meißner, Chi Wai Cheung","doi":"10.1186/s41256-025-00442-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite advancements in global healthcare, Asia lacks a systematic framework for postoperative pain-related symptoms, particularly in addressing pain identification/prevention and reporting sex differences. This study used network analysis to unravel the complex interplay of pain-related symptoms, analgesic opioid dosages, and psychosocial factors, with a particular focus on sex differences in the Asian population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Utilizing anonymized data from 5,093 adult patients across seven Asian regions between 2018 and 2021 from the PAIN OUT registry, this study applied network analysis: 1) to map the relationships between analgesic opioid dosages and multidimensional pain-related symptoms and 2) to explore sex differences. This network analysis was performed based on information from the International Pain Outcomes Questionnaire (IPO-Q), which included pain severity, adverse events, perceptions of pain care perception, and pain treatment satisfaction within 24h of an operation. The model utilized Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) for regularization and edge estimation, a penalized estimation method allowing for the identification of the most relevant connections while effectively controlling for overfitting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Network structures demonstrated high stability, revealing distinct sex-based patterns. Chronicity of pain (#CP) emerged as the most central node in the overall network structure (EI = 1.50) and among male patients (EI = 1.80), reflecting the profound effect of persistent pain on their functional activities and sensory-focused symptoms, such as dizziness (#AE4). In contrast, helplessness (#MH2) was a significant symptom in female patients (EI = 1.70), highlighting the emotional and psychological dimensions of their pain experience. Comparative analysis uncovered significant structural differences between males and females (M = 0.154, p = 0.023), emphasizing the unique interplay of psychological, emotional, societal, and pathophysiological symptoms in shaping postoperative pain experiences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study was the first comprehensive network analysis of pain-related symptoms with sex differences. The results highlighted a significant difference in associations between analgesic opioid dosages and multidimensional pain-related symptoms among males and females, implying the necessity for region-specific, multimodal interventions to optimize postoperative care in Asian populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":52405,"journal":{"name":"Global Health Research and Policy","volume":"10 1","pages":"51"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12502417/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Health Research and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-025-00442-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite advancements in global healthcare, Asia lacks a systematic framework for postoperative pain-related symptoms, particularly in addressing pain identification/prevention and reporting sex differences. This study used network analysis to unravel the complex interplay of pain-related symptoms, analgesic opioid dosages, and psychosocial factors, with a particular focus on sex differences in the Asian population.

Methods: Utilizing anonymized data from 5,093 adult patients across seven Asian regions between 2018 and 2021 from the PAIN OUT registry, this study applied network analysis: 1) to map the relationships between analgesic opioid dosages and multidimensional pain-related symptoms and 2) to explore sex differences. This network analysis was performed based on information from the International Pain Outcomes Questionnaire (IPO-Q), which included pain severity, adverse events, perceptions of pain care perception, and pain treatment satisfaction within 24h of an operation. The model utilized Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) for regularization and edge estimation, a penalized estimation method allowing for the identification of the most relevant connections while effectively controlling for overfitting.

Results: Network structures demonstrated high stability, revealing distinct sex-based patterns. Chronicity of pain (#CP) emerged as the most central node in the overall network structure (EI = 1.50) and among male patients (EI = 1.80), reflecting the profound effect of persistent pain on their functional activities and sensory-focused symptoms, such as dizziness (#AE4). In contrast, helplessness (#MH2) was a significant symptom in female patients (EI = 1.70), highlighting the emotional and psychological dimensions of their pain experience. Comparative analysis uncovered significant structural differences between males and females (M = 0.154, p = 0.023), emphasizing the unique interplay of psychological, emotional, societal, and pathophysiological symptoms in shaping postoperative pain experiences.

Conclusions: This study was the first comprehensive network analysis of pain-related symptoms with sex differences. The results highlighted a significant difference in associations between analgesic opioid dosages and multidimensional pain-related symptoms among males and females, implying the necessity for region-specific, multimodal interventions to optimize postoperative care in Asian populations.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

区分网络结构和性别差异的疼痛相关结果,镇痛阿片类药物剂量,以及术后管理的社会心理因素:一项亚洲7个地区的PAIN OUT登记研究。
背景:尽管全球医疗保健取得了进步,但亚洲缺乏术后疼痛相关症状的系统框架,特别是在解决疼痛识别/预防和报告性别差异方面。本研究使用网络分析来揭示疼痛相关症状、镇痛类阿片剂量和社会心理因素之间复杂的相互作用,并特别关注亚洲人群的性别差异。方法:利用2018年至2021年间来自亚洲7个地区的5093名成年患者的匿名数据,本研究应用网络分析:1)绘制镇痛阿片类药物剂量与多维疼痛相关症状之间的关系;2)探索性别差异。该网络分析基于国际疼痛结局问卷(IPO-Q)的信息,包括手术后24小时内的疼痛严重程度、不良事件、疼痛护理感知和疼痛治疗满意度。该模型利用最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)进行正则化和边缘估计,这是一种惩罚估计方法,允许识别最相关的连接,同时有效地控制过拟合。结果:网络结构具有较高的稳定性,呈现出明显的性别特征。慢性疼痛(#CP)在整个网络结构(EI = 1.50)和男性患者(EI = 1.80)中成为最中心的节点,反映了持续性疼痛对他们的功能活动和感觉集中症状(如头晕)的深刻影响(#AE4)。相比之下,无助感(#MH2)是女性患者的一个显著症状(EI = 1.70),突出了她们疼痛经历的情感和心理层面。对比分析揭示了男性和女性之间显著的结构差异(M = 0.154, p = 0.023),强调了心理、情感、社会和病理生理症状在形成术后疼痛体验中的独特相互作用。结论:本研究首次对具有性别差异的疼痛相关症状进行了全面的网络分析。研究结果强调,在男性和女性中,镇痛阿片类药物剂量与多维疼痛相关症状之间的关联存在显著差异,这意味着有必要针对特定区域进行多模式干预,以优化亚洲人群的术后护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Health Research and Policy
Global Health Research and Policy Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
1.10%
发文量
43
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Health Research and Policy, an open-access, multidisciplinary journal, publishes research on various aspects of global health, addressing topics like health equity, health systems and policy, social determinants of health, disease burden, population health, and other urgent global health issues. It serves as a forum for high-quality research focused on regional and global health improvement, emphasizing solutions for health equity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信