Alpha defensin immunoassay is more effective for ruling out rather than diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI): a prospective cohort study.

IF 4.3 4区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Mohammad Kamal Abdelnasser, Ayat Bakhet, Amal Hosni, Dalia Tarik Kamal, Osama Bakr Osman, Mohammed Anter Abdelhameed, Mohamed Ma Moustafa
{"title":"Alpha defensin immunoassay is more effective for ruling out rather than diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI): a prospective cohort study.","authors":"Mohammad Kamal Abdelnasser, Ayat Bakhet, Amal Hosni, Dalia Tarik Kamal, Osama Bakr Osman, Mohammed Anter Abdelhameed, Mohamed Ma Moustafa","doi":"10.1186/s42836-025-00337-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate and timely diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is of utmost importance. Although synovial alpha-defensin has shown potential as a biomarker, recent studies have questioned its additional benefit over traditional synovial biomarkers and advised against its routine use. The primary objective is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the alpha-defensin immunoassay in PJI. Secondary objectives include comparing its diagnostic accuracy against traditional biomarkers and assessing our results in the context of existing research to provide a solid perspective on its clinical utility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective cohort study. Synovial samples were obtained at the time of revision arthroplasty or from painful arthroplasties. A complete laboratory workup was performed, including CBC, ESR, CRP, WBCs count. Synovial samples were analyzed for leucocytic count, PMN percentage, leucocyte esterase, and alpha-defensin immunoassay. Culture and sensitivity, and histopathology were also done. Patients who met the inclusion criteria were classified into septic and aseptic according to MSIS criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety joints met our inclusion criteria. Alpha-defensin immunoassay was positive in 36 joints and negative in 54 joints, with 1 false positive and 3 false negatives, resulting in a sensitivity of 92.11% (95% CI, 78.62-98.34%), a specificity of 98.08% (95% CI, 89.74-99.95%), positive predictive value (PPV) of 49.43% (95% CI, 12.28-87.22%), negative predictive value (NPV) of 99.84% (95% CI, 99.52-99.94%) and diagnostic accuracy of 97.96% (95% CI, 92.48-99.78%). The optimal cutoff was 9.2, and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.945.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While the alpha defensin immunoassay is not recommended to be used routinely as a screening method for PJI, its high specificity and NPV make it a valuable addition to traditional blood and synovial parameters in the diagnosis of complex hip and knee PJI, particularly for ruling out infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":52831,"journal":{"name":"Arthroplasty","volume":"7 1","pages":"52"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12506515/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-025-00337-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Accurate and timely diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is of utmost importance. Although synovial alpha-defensin has shown potential as a biomarker, recent studies have questioned its additional benefit over traditional synovial biomarkers and advised against its routine use. The primary objective is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the alpha-defensin immunoassay in PJI. Secondary objectives include comparing its diagnostic accuracy against traditional biomarkers and assessing our results in the context of existing research to provide a solid perspective on its clinical utility.

Methods: This is a prospective cohort study. Synovial samples were obtained at the time of revision arthroplasty or from painful arthroplasties. A complete laboratory workup was performed, including CBC, ESR, CRP, WBCs count. Synovial samples were analyzed for leucocytic count, PMN percentage, leucocyte esterase, and alpha-defensin immunoassay. Culture and sensitivity, and histopathology were also done. Patients who met the inclusion criteria were classified into septic and aseptic according to MSIS criteria.

Results: Ninety joints met our inclusion criteria. Alpha-defensin immunoassay was positive in 36 joints and negative in 54 joints, with 1 false positive and 3 false negatives, resulting in a sensitivity of 92.11% (95% CI, 78.62-98.34%), a specificity of 98.08% (95% CI, 89.74-99.95%), positive predictive value (PPV) of 49.43% (95% CI, 12.28-87.22%), negative predictive value (NPV) of 99.84% (95% CI, 99.52-99.94%) and diagnostic accuracy of 97.96% (95% CI, 92.48-99.78%). The optimal cutoff was 9.2, and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.945.

Conclusions: While the alpha defensin immunoassay is not recommended to be used routinely as a screening method for PJI, its high specificity and NPV make it a valuable addition to traditional blood and synovial parameters in the diagnosis of complex hip and knee PJI, particularly for ruling out infection.

一项前瞻性队列研究表明,α防御素免疫测定在排除而不是诊断假体周围关节感染(PJI)方面更有效。
背景:准确、及时诊断假体周围关节感染(PJI)至关重要。尽管滑膜α -防御素已显示出作为生物标志物的潜力,但最近的研究质疑其比传统滑膜生物标志物的额外益处,并建议不要常规使用。主要目的是评估α -防御素免疫测定在PJI中的诊断准确性。次要目标包括比较其与传统生物标志物的诊断准确性,并在现有研究的背景下评估我们的结果,以提供其临床应用的坚实视角。方法:这是一项前瞻性队列研究。滑膜样本是在翻修关节置换术时或从痛苦的关节置换术中获得的。进行了完整的实验室检查,包括CBC, ESR, CRP,白细胞计数。对滑膜样本进行白细胞计数、PMN百分比、白细胞酯酶和α -防御素免疫分析。同时进行培养、敏感及组织病理学检查。符合纳入标准的患者根据MSIS标准分为脓毒症和无菌症。结果:90个关节符合我们的纳入标准。α -防御素免疫测定阳性36例,阴性54例,假阳性1例,假阴性3例,敏感性92.11% (95% CI, 78.62 ~ 98.34%),特异性98.08% (95% CI, 89.74 ~ 99.95%),阳性预测值(PPV)为49.43% (95% CI, 12.28 ~ 87.22%),阴性预测值(NPV)为99.84% (95% CI, 99.52 ~ 99.94%),诊断准确率97.96% (95% CI, 92.48 ~ 99.78%)。最佳截止值为9.2,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.945。结论:虽然不推荐将α防御素免疫分析法作为PJI的常规筛查方法,但其高特异性和NPV使其成为诊断复杂髋关节和膝关节PJI的传统血液和滑膜参数的宝贵补充,特别是在排除感染方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arthroplasty
Arthroplasty ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信