Eight ways speech-language pathologists can contribute to health equity: the case of Black stroke survivors with aphasia.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Davetrina S Gadson, Peter E Turkeltaub
{"title":"Eight ways speech-language pathologists can contribute to health equity: the case of Black stroke survivors with aphasia.","authors":"Davetrina S Gadson, Peter E Turkeltaub","doi":"10.1080/02687038.2025.2561681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Speech language pathologists (SLPs) play a vital role in service delivery in post stroke aphasia. However, SLPs can potentially perpetuate health disparities due to 1) a lack of training regarding social determinants of health and how they contribute to clinical outcomes and associated disparities and 2) a lack of understanding of the rapidly evolving research related to equity of service provision needed to reduce or eliminate health disparities.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This article provides recommendations for individual SLPs and the field more broadly to support health equity for people with aphasia and related disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods and procedures: </strong>We considered evidence-based practices from general healthcare to promote health equity and identified opportunities to apply these practices in the SLP field, focusing on the literature on racial inequities in post-stroke aphasia as an illustrative example.</p><p><strong>Outcome and results: </strong>Lack of diversity in the workforce, lack of training in health disparities and methods to promote health equity, and lack of representation in research may contribute to inequities in healthcare for people with aphasia and other communication disorders. We identified eight recommendations for SLPs to promote health equity for people with aphasia and other communication disorders.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SLPs should commit to a goal of equity in service delivery. This viewpoint provides actionable recommendations for clinicians, educators, and researchers, for promoting health equity for people with aphasia and related disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":50744,"journal":{"name":"Aphasiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12498567/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aphasiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2025.2561681","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Speech language pathologists (SLPs) play a vital role in service delivery in post stroke aphasia. However, SLPs can potentially perpetuate health disparities due to 1) a lack of training regarding social determinants of health and how they contribute to clinical outcomes and associated disparities and 2) a lack of understanding of the rapidly evolving research related to equity of service provision needed to reduce or eliminate health disparities.

Aims: This article provides recommendations for individual SLPs and the field more broadly to support health equity for people with aphasia and related disorders.

Methods and procedures: We considered evidence-based practices from general healthcare to promote health equity and identified opportunities to apply these practices in the SLP field, focusing on the literature on racial inequities in post-stroke aphasia as an illustrative example.

Outcome and results: Lack of diversity in the workforce, lack of training in health disparities and methods to promote health equity, and lack of representation in research may contribute to inequities in healthcare for people with aphasia and other communication disorders. We identified eight recommendations for SLPs to promote health equity for people with aphasia and other communication disorders.

Conclusions: SLPs should commit to a goal of equity in service delivery. This viewpoint provides actionable recommendations for clinicians, educators, and researchers, for promoting health equity for people with aphasia and related disorders.

语言病理学家可以通过八种方式促进健康平等:黑人中风患者失语症的案例。
背景:语言病理学家在卒中后失语症的服务提供中起着至关重要的作用。然而,由于以下原因,slp可能使健康差距长期存在:1)缺乏关于健康的社会决定因素及其如何促成临床结果和相关差距的培训;2)缺乏对减少或消除健康差距所需的与服务提供公平相关的快速发展的研究的了解。目的:本文为失语症患者和相关疾病患者的健康公平提供了个人和更广泛领域的建议。方法和程序:我们考虑了来自一般医疗保健的循证实践,以促进健康公平,并确定了将这些实践应用于SLP领域的机会,重点关注中风后失语症的种族不平等文献作为一个说明性例子。结果和结果:劳动力缺乏多样性,缺乏关于健康差异和促进健康公平方法的培训,以及在研究中缺乏代表性,可能导致失语症和其他沟通障碍患者在保健方面的不平等。我们确定了八项slp建议,以促进失语症和其他沟通障碍患者的健康公平。结论:slp应致力于服务提供公平的目标。这一观点为临床医生、教育工作者和研究人员提供了可行的建议,以促进失语症和相关疾病患者的健康公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Aphasiology
Aphasiology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
15.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Aphasiology is concerned with all aspects of language impairment and disability and related disorders resulting from brain damage. It provides a forum for the exchange of knowledge and the dissemination of current research and expertise in all aspects of aphasia and related topics, from all disciplinary perspectives. Aphasiology includes papers on clinical, psychological, linguistic, social and neurological perspectives of aphasia, and attracts contributions and readership from researchers and practitioners in speech and language pathology, neurology, neuropsychology and neurolinguistics. Studies using a wide range of empirical methods, including experimental, clinical and single case studies, surveys and physical investigations are published in addition to regular features including major reviews, clinical fora, case studies, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信