On Thinking, Nursing Scholarship and the Science of the Unique.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Stefanos Mantzoukas
{"title":"On Thinking, Nursing Scholarship and the Science of the Unique.","authors":"Stefanos Mantzoukas","doi":"10.1111/nup.70044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this paper, I go back to one of Gary Rolfe's seminal papers entitled \"Thinking as a subversive activity: doing philosophy in the corporate university\" (2012), published in the journal Nursing Philosophy, to acknowledge and possibly expand on Rolfe's work on thinking, scholarship and the future of the nursing profession. Rolfe is a prolific academic nurse author, and while there is a thread linking his extensive authorship, his work branches out on a variety of sub-topics that this paper cannot do justice to, nor does it intend to be a comprehensive review of his work. In this paper, I aim to develop an account and provide my understanding, inspired by Rolfe's work, on how thinking, scholarship, and nursing science interlink and develop each other, and how scholarly thinking can potentially, notwithstanding certain caveats, flourish and guide the future of nursing education within the university sector.</p>","PeriodicalId":49724,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Philosophy","volume":"26 4","pages":"e70044"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12503390/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.70044","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, I go back to one of Gary Rolfe's seminal papers entitled "Thinking as a subversive activity: doing philosophy in the corporate university" (2012), published in the journal Nursing Philosophy, to acknowledge and possibly expand on Rolfe's work on thinking, scholarship and the future of the nursing profession. Rolfe is a prolific academic nurse author, and while there is a thread linking his extensive authorship, his work branches out on a variety of sub-topics that this paper cannot do justice to, nor does it intend to be a comprehensive review of his work. In this paper, I aim to develop an account and provide my understanding, inspired by Rolfe's work, on how thinking, scholarship, and nursing science interlink and develop each other, and how scholarly thinking can potentially, notwithstanding certain caveats, flourish and guide the future of nursing education within the university sector.

论思维、护理学术与科学的独特性。
在本文中,我回顾了加里·罗尔夫(Gary Rolfe)发表在《护理哲学》(Nursing philosophy)杂志上的一篇开创性论文,题为《思考是一种颠覆性活动:在企业大学做哲学》(2012),以承认并可能扩展罗尔夫在思考、学术和护理专业未来方面的工作。罗尔夫是一位多产的学术护士作家,虽然有一条线索连接着他广泛的作者,但他的工作分支在各种各样的子主题上,本文无法公正地对待,也不打算对他的工作进行全面的回顾。在本文中,我的目标是开发一个帐户并提供我的理解,受罗尔夫工作的启发,关于思维,学术和护理科学如何相互联系和发展,以及学术思维如何潜在地,尽管有某些警告,蓬勃发展并指导大学部门护理教育的未来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
39
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Philosophy provides a forum for discussion of philosophical issues in nursing. These focus on questions relating to the nature of nursing and to the phenomena of key relevance to it. For example, any understanding of what nursing is presupposes some conception of just what nurses are trying to do when they nurse. But what are the ends of nursing? Are they to promote health, prevent disease, promote well-being, enhance autonomy, relieve suffering, or some combination of these? How are these ends are to be met? What kind of knowledge is needed in order to nurse? Practical, theoretical, aesthetic, moral, political, ''intuitive'' or some other? Papers that explore other aspects of philosophical enquiry and analysis of relevance to nursing (and any other healthcare or social care activity) are also welcome and might include, but not be limited to, critical discussions of the work of nurse theorists who have advanced philosophical claims (e.g., Benner, Benner and Wrubel, Carper, Schrok, Watson, Parse and so on) as well as critical engagement with philosophers (e.g., Heidegger, Husserl, Kuhn, Polanyi, Taylor, MacIntyre and so on) whose work informs health care in general and nursing in particular.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信