Incidence of Ectopic Pregnancy and Diagnostic Accuracy of Ectopic Pregnancy Screening Criteria Among People Seeking Versus Not Seeking Abortion: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
M Antonia Biggs, Mary Anne Armstrong, Lue-Yen Tucker, Shelly Kaller, Juleon Rabbani, Justine W Lee, Giulia Chillemi, Daniel Grossman
{"title":"Incidence of Ectopic Pregnancy and Diagnostic Accuracy of Ectopic Pregnancy Screening Criteria Among People Seeking Versus Not Seeking Abortion: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.","authors":"M Antonia Biggs, Mary Anne Armstrong, Lue-Yen Tucker, Shelly Kaller, Juleon Rabbani, Justine W Lee, Giulia Chillemi, Daniel Grossman","doi":"10.1016/j.whi.2025.08.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We estimated the incidence of ectopic pregnancy, associated risk factors, and accuracy of three history-based screening criteria for medication abortion (history of ectopic pregnancy, tubal surgery, and intrauterine device [IUD] in place) in detecting ectopic pregnancies among people seeking versus not seeking abortion.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We conducted a retrospective case-control study by reviewing electronic health records of a random sample of 2,201 ectopic and 1,153 intrauterine pregnancies of people enrolled at Kaiser Permanente Northern California (2016-2021). After classifying pregnancies as those to people seeking or not seeking abortion, we used logistic regression weighted to the total sample of pregnancies (N = 385,081) to estimate the incidence of ectopic pregnancies, associated risk factors, and accuracy of three history-based screening criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The adjusted incidence of ectopic pregnancy was significantly lower for people seeking abortion (.39%; 95% confidence interval [CI] [.30%, .47%]) than for people not seeking abortion (1.74%; 95% CI [1.55%, 1.94%]). People seeking abortion received ectopic pregnancy treatment earlier in pregnancy than those not seeking abortion (53 vs. 55 days gestation, p = .04). Among people seeking abortion, combined history of IUD use, ectopic pregnancy, and tubal surgery had low sensitivity (17.6%; 95% CI [12.4%, 23.8%]), high specificity (93.5%; 95% CI [90.2%, 96.0%]), and a low area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value (55.5%; 95% CI [52.5%, 58.6%]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The incidence of ectopic pregnancy among people seeking abortion is extremely low and lower than among people not seeking abortion. The three history-based screening criteria we evaluated had very low sensitivity and performed poorly in accurately identifying ectopic pregnancies, suggesting they may have limited clinical utility and may create barriers to access to no-test abortion. Further research is needed to refine protocols to better identify, evaluate, and monitor people for possible ectopic pregnancies in the context of no-test provision of medication abortion.</p>","PeriodicalId":48039,"journal":{"name":"Womens Health Issues","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Womens Health Issues","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2025.08.006","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: We estimated the incidence of ectopic pregnancy, associated risk factors, and accuracy of three history-based screening criteria for medication abortion (history of ectopic pregnancy, tubal surgery, and intrauterine device [IUD] in place) in detecting ectopic pregnancies among people seeking versus not seeking abortion.

Study design: We conducted a retrospective case-control study by reviewing electronic health records of a random sample of 2,201 ectopic and 1,153 intrauterine pregnancies of people enrolled at Kaiser Permanente Northern California (2016-2021). After classifying pregnancies as those to people seeking or not seeking abortion, we used logistic regression weighted to the total sample of pregnancies (N = 385,081) to estimate the incidence of ectopic pregnancies, associated risk factors, and accuracy of three history-based screening criteria.

Results: The adjusted incidence of ectopic pregnancy was significantly lower for people seeking abortion (.39%; 95% confidence interval [CI] [.30%, .47%]) than for people not seeking abortion (1.74%; 95% CI [1.55%, 1.94%]). People seeking abortion received ectopic pregnancy treatment earlier in pregnancy than those not seeking abortion (53 vs. 55 days gestation, p = .04). Among people seeking abortion, combined history of IUD use, ectopic pregnancy, and tubal surgery had low sensitivity (17.6%; 95% CI [12.4%, 23.8%]), high specificity (93.5%; 95% CI [90.2%, 96.0%]), and a low area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value (55.5%; 95% CI [52.5%, 58.6%]).

Conclusions: The incidence of ectopic pregnancy among people seeking abortion is extremely low and lower than among people not seeking abortion. The three history-based screening criteria we evaluated had very low sensitivity and performed poorly in accurately identifying ectopic pregnancies, suggesting they may have limited clinical utility and may create barriers to access to no-test abortion. Further research is needed to refine protocols to better identify, evaluate, and monitor people for possible ectopic pregnancies in the context of no-test provision of medication abortion.

异位妊娠的发生率和异位妊娠筛查标准在寻求与不寻求流产人群中的诊断准确性:一项回顾性病例对照研究。
目的:我们评估了异位妊娠的发生率、相关危险因素,以及三种基于病史的药物流产筛查标准(异位妊娠史、输卵管手术史和放置宫内节育器)在寻求与未寻求流产人群中检测异位妊娠的准确性。研究设计:我们进行了一项回顾性病例对照研究,通过回顾在Kaiser Permanente北加州注册的2201例异位妊娠和1153例宫内妊娠的随机样本的电子健康记录(2016-2021)。在将妊娠分为寻求流产和不寻求流产两类后,我们对妊娠总样本(N = 385,081)进行了加权logistic回归,以估计异位妊娠的发生率、相关危险因素和三个基于历史的筛查标准的准确性。结果:寻求流产者的异位妊娠调整发生率显著降低(0.39%;95%可信区间[CI])。30%,。47%])比不寻求堕胎的人(1.74%;95% CI[1.55%, 1.94%])。寻求流产的患者比未寻求流产的患者在妊娠早期接受异位妊娠治疗(妊娠53天对55天,p = .04)。在寻求流产的人群中,宫内节育器使用史、宫外孕史和输卵管手术史合并敏感性低(17.6%;95% CI[12.4%, 23.8%]),特异性高(93.5%;95% CI[90.2%, 96.0%]),受者工作特征曲线值下面积低(55.5%;95% CI[52.5%, 58.6%])。结论:异位妊娠在人工流产人群中的发生率极低,低于未人工流产人群。我们评估的三个基于病史的筛查标准敏感性很低,在准确识别异位妊娠方面表现不佳,这表明它们的临床应用可能有限,并可能对无检测流产造成障碍。需要进一步的研究来完善方案,以便更好地识别、评估和监测在无检测提供药物流产的情况下可能发生的异位妊娠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: Women"s Health Issues (WHI) is a peer-reviewed, bimonthly, multidisciplinary journal that publishes research and review manuscripts related to women"s health care and policy. As the official journal of the Jacobs Institute of Women"s Health, it is dedicated to improving the health and health care of all women throughout the lifespan and in diverse communities. The journal seeks to inform health services researchers, health care and public health professionals, social scientists, policymakers, and others concerned with women"s health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信